IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v21y2025i5p64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Laozi and Socrates’ Humanistic Thoughts

Author

Listed:
  • Lijun Liu

Abstract

The period from 600 BCE to 300 BCE was a pivotal era, during which various civilizations in the East and West made significant breakthroughs. In the East, the ancient Chinese sage Laozi, living in a time of moral decay and social upheaval, transcended the practical realm to recognize the intrinsic value of humanity. This led him to develop a series of doctrines on ethics and self-cultivation. In the West, the ancient Greek philosopher Socrates focused his thoughts on self-knowledge, bringing philosophy from the divine to the human realm, thus marking the beginning of Western humanistic concern. Both Laozi and Socrates introduced their respective humanistic ideas during this period, yet the origins of their thoughts differ greatly. A comparative study of Laozi and Socrates' humanistic philosophies will offer a deeper understanding of their humanistic spirit, explore the relevance of their ideas to modern society, and contribute to the inheritance of excellent traditional cultures.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijun Liu, 2025. "A Comparative Study of Laozi and Socrates’ Humanistic Thoughts," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 21(5), pages 1-64, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:21:y:2025:i:5:p:64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/0/0/52282/56936
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/0/52282
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:21:y:2025:i:5:p:64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.