IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v14y2018i8p153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family Dispute Resolution from the Perspective of Comparative Law

Author

Listed:
  • Chungang Miao

Abstract

Family cases are different from ordinary civil cases in that they have their own ethical solutions. The traditional Chinese law deals with family disputes focusing on reason law, while legal reform uses the legal technical rationality to weaken the ethical attributes. The current reform of the family trials in China is based on the experience of the extraterritorial law, and gives due consideration to the return of the family-based standard, paying attention to the rights of under-age children. Around this goal, issues such as the resolution principles and procedures of family disputes should be adjusted.

Suggested Citation

  • Chungang Miao, 2018. "Family Dispute Resolution from the Perspective of Comparative Law," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(8), pages 153-153, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:8:p:153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/76411/42488
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/76411
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:8:p:153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.