IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v14y2018i7p92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction of Hangzhou Silk Cognitive Evaluation System Based on the Grounded Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Aijuan Cao

Abstract

The article adopts the grounded theory research method, where it takes “how people perceive and evaluate Hangzhou Silk†as the research subject, and uses data that was obtained through interviews and investigations as data source. With the systematic analysis of the original data, this paper gradually extracts and summarizes the content dimension and evaluation results of consumers' cognition evaluation on Hangzhou silk using the quantitative analysis software NVivo 11.0. Finally, based on the eight dimensions of the above research, this study combs and analyzes the logical relationship between them, and constructs the cognition evaluation system of Hangzhou silk. The research conclusion enriches and expands the research scope in the field of silk cognition research.

Suggested Citation

  • Aijuan Cao, 2018. "Construction of Hangzhou Silk Cognitive Evaluation System Based on the Grounded Theory," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(7), pages 1-92, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:7:p:92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/75611/42102
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/75611
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:7:p:92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.