IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v14y2018i4p38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EFL Students’ Burnout in English Learning: A Case Study of Chinese Middle School Students

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Wu
  • Yan Ma
  • Feng Wang

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the English learningburnout of Chinese middle school students to provide solutions to reduce it. Foreign Language Classroom Burnout Scale (FLCBS) is used to make an investigation into 212 middle school students of different grades in No. 10 Middle School in Xi’an city in China. After both qualitative and quantitative analyses of data collected from the questionnaires, it finds out that- 1) a medium level of English learning burnout exists in the students of No.10 Middle School (M=53.80). 2) In terms of grade, three grades have no statistically significant differences in burnout (p=0.377>0.05). 3) As for gender, there is statistically significant difference (p=0.001<0.05). The male’s total burnout is higher than the female’s, especially in Low Efficiency (p=0.006<0.05). 4) There is statistically significant difference in English learning burnout between different majors (p=0.001<0.05). The learning burnout of science students is higher than that of art students, especially in Depletion and Low Efficiency. Based on the research findings, it puts out such suggestions for teachers to lower down students’ English learning burnout as building up students’ confidence, adopting new teaching methods, and improving the relationship between teacher and students.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Wu & Yan Ma & Feng Wang, 2018. "EFL Students’ Burnout in English Learning: A Case Study of Chinese Middle School Students," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(4), pages 1-38, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:4:p:38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/0/0/29650/43450
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/73245
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:4:p:38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.