IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v13y2017i12p112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Housing Standards and Spatial Design Guidelines for Mobility Handicaps in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Sasicha Sukkay
  • Prapatpong Upala

Abstract

The objectives of this research are 1) to compare the standards of housing design for mobility disabled at the domestic and universal levels, 2) to standardize the developing process of housing design guideline for mobility handicapped properly with the context of Thailand, and 3) to evaluate the proficiency of the guideline by employing both qualitative and quantitative research methods. Regarding the guidelines comparison, the results indicated that the available housing design guidelines in Thailand had excluded the spatial allocation standard for supporting the mobility dependency as well as some particular dwelling functions had been abandoned from these guidelines. Furthermore, it appeared that these design guidelines were not constituted based on the participatory of multidisciplinary experts, for instance, medical and architectural professionals. This research had initiated an evaluating process for the guideline’s competence by using four indicators,namely, 1) comprehension, 2) completeness, 3) convenience, and 4) composition of design. The rating scale questionnaires were distributed to the two sampling groups comprising the group of 30 experienced Government agencies and the group of 30 mobility handicapped. The data collection consisted of two main steps- 1) the assessment of the comparative study-based guideline and 2) the assessment of the participatory-based guideline. The data retrieved from these two phases were analyzed by the inferential statistics, Paired Sample t-test. The results revealed the differences between these two sampling groups in every design category at the significance level of 0.05. It was clear that the participatory-based guideline was more efficient than the comparative study-based guideline (p ≤ 0.005). Besides, the evaluating scores addressed by the group of experienced Government agencies and the group of mobility disabled representative were discovered significantly contrary.

Suggested Citation

  • Sasicha Sukkay & Prapatpong Upala, 2017. "Development of Housing Standards and Spatial Design Guidelines for Mobility Handicaps in Thailand," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(12), pages 112-112, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:13:y:2017:i:12:p:112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/70860/39435
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/70860
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tina Helle & Aase Brandt & Björn Slaug & Susanne Iwarsson, 2011. "Lack of research-based standards for accessible housing: problematization and exemplification of consequences," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(6), pages 635-644, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oskar Jonsson & Joakim Frögren & Maria Haak & Björn Slaug & Susanne Iwarsson, 2021. "Understanding the Wicked Problem of Providing Accessible Housing for the Ageing Population in Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Laura L. Lien & Carmen D. Steggell & Susanne Iwarsson, 2015. "Adaptive Strategies and Person-Environment Fit among Functionally Limited Older Adults Aging in Place: A Mixed Methods Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Lorenzo Capasso & Daniela D’Alessandro, 2021. "Housing and Health: Here We Go Again," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-9, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:13:y:2017:i:12:p:112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.