IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v12y2016i6p140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examination of Orientalist Views on the Law-Giving Prophets

Author

Listed:
  • Hassan Rezaee Haftador
  • Morteza Walizadeh
  • Seyf Ali Zahedifar

Abstract

The law-giving prophets or the prophets of strong resolve are prophets that possessed independent divine books and religions. Noah, Abraham, and Moses are numbered among the prophets of strong resolve. Orientalists have studied issues related to these prophets. The present study evaluates the views of orientalists concerning prophets of strong resolve. This library study takes an analytic, critical, and descriptive approach to the topic. Though examination of the views of orientalists concerning prophets of strong resolve is the focus of this study, views of Muslim scholars are also considered to complement the study. As indicated by examination of their opinions on the matter, orientalists have performed extensive research in Islamic sources on prophets of strong resolve. However, they have utilised weak Islamic narratives and have thus erred in regard to these prophets.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassan Rezaee Haftador & Morteza Walizadeh & Seyf Ali Zahedifar, 2016. "Examination of Orientalist Views on the Law-Giving Prophets," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 140-140, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:12:y:2016:i:6:p:140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/57322/32116
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/57322
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:12:y:2016:i:6:p:140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.