IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v12y2016i12p90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voicing up in Debate Competition: Oral Development of Two Malaysian ESL Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Farzaneh Amiri
  • Moomala Othman
  • Maryam Jahedi

Abstract

This research used a qualitative approach to focus on the classroom debate between Malaysian English second language learners (ESL). Since debate has been often perceived as not a suitable activity for low proficiency students due to their limited linguistic resources, there has not been much emphasis on the impact of debate on incompetent ESL learners; however, this study was an attempt to concentrate on two students who were not competent in English to investigate their oral development via debate. The study observed the communicative strategies employed in this challenging task during the five debate rounds. Although the progress made was quite limited, the study showed that debate competition can be a relevant and meaningful practice for speaking activity among low proficiency students. Moreover, it showed that debate can be used to scaffold students’ practice in speaking.

Suggested Citation

  • Farzaneh Amiri & Moomala Othman & Maryam Jahedi, 2016. "Voicing up in Debate Competition: Oral Development of Two Malaysian ESL Learners," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 1-90, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:12:y:2016:i:12:p:90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/62248/34454
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/62248
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:12:y:2016:i:12:p:90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.