IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ach123/v8y2016i2p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socio-Cultural Values of Traditional Communities: A Case Study of the Dayak in Kalimantan

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Luardini

Abstract

This article is intended to reveal the socio-cultural values of traditional remote area communities of the Dayak in Central Kalimantan based on two legends and the existence of these communities. By applying semantics of sign systems, the expressions in texts showed connotative meanings referring to river communities, and the denotative meaning of living in forests for forest communities. While, expressions of migration could be related to cultural of manamuai ‘wander’ tradition and way of life as shifting cultivation farmers. Recently, the existence of these communities has contradicted government rules due to the laws in opening forests illegally. However, based on the characteristics, these communities can live in harmony with the government and forests investors through the empowerment programs for remote communities and CSR of forests’ companies (logging or palm oil).

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Luardini, 2016. "Socio-Cultural Values of Traditional Communities: A Case Study of the Dayak in Kalimantan," Asian Culture and History, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(2), pages 1-1, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ach123:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ach/article/download/56583/31047
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ach/article/view/56583
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lailatul Khuriyah & Sugeng Utaya & Ari Sapto, 2017. "The Relevance of Erau Tradition Values toward Character Building Values," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 102-102, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ach123:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.