IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ach123/v8y2016i1p57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Traditional Community in the Chao Phraya River Basin: Classification and Characteristics of a Waterfront Community Complex

Author

Listed:
  • Patiphol Yodsurang
  • Miki Hiromi
  • Uekita Yasufumi

Abstract

Traditional waterfront communities are extremely significant in understanding the role and influence of the daily lives of an indigenous amphibious culture and are considered to be a counterpart of the contemporary community that would have existed in the past. This study gives a systematic overview of the traditional waterfront community complex in the Chao Phraya River Basin to identify the phenomenology and salient features characterizing the waterfront community through the analysis of the following- 1) features of geography and waterbodies; 2) cultural landscapes and agricultural activities; 3) urban components; and 4) architectural features. A total of 138 traditional waterfront communities were selected using the purposive sampling method. Quantitative data collection was conducted using field investigation to collect and evaluate the validity of properties in actual conditions. The data were analyzed using a statistical analysis program to examine the similarity and correlation of the data set. To identify characteristics, hierarchical clustering and decision-tree analysis were used to group similar communities together and classify the complexity of a traditional waterfront community. Principal component analysis was then used to detect the true association between the relevant variables. In addition, qualitative assessment of secondary document collection, legislation, previous and present public policies, research, and criticisms were used to support the argument for statistical analysis. The results provided seven clusters based on common preferences consisting of a market town, paddy village, raft community, waterfront market, comprehensive estuarine agricultural village, orchard village, and fishing village. These clusters show diversity in the cultural landscape, with agricultural activities exerting influence on the community complex, creating both direct and indirect association, with several significant variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Patiphol Yodsurang & Miki Hiromi & Uekita Yasufumi, 2016. "A Traditional Community in the Chao Phraya River Basin: Classification and Characteristics of a Waterfront Community Complex," Asian Culture and History, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 1-57, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ach123:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ach/article/download/52520/28499
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ach/article/view/52520
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Molle, Francois, 2005. "Elements for a political ecology of river basins development: The case of the Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand," Conference Papers h039322, International Water Management Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lafaye de Micheaux, Flore & Kull, Christian, 2020. "Combining Political Ecology and ‘Mésologie’ for a New Geography of Rivers?," Ecology, Economy and Society - the INSEE Journal, Indian Society of Ecological Economics (INSEE), vol. 3(02), July.
    2. Alda Miftari, 2019. "Sustainability of water use in agriculture. Southern European farmers participation and social impact," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 19, pages 131-145, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ach123:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.