IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Counteracting Counterfeiting? Bodin, Mariana, and Locke on False Money as a Multidimensional Issue

Listed author(s):
  • Ludovic Desmedt
  • Jérôme Blanc

Far more than the problem of the quantity of money, false money was the central issue in monetary debates that occurred in Europe in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. It first referred to sovereignty, in a time of state-building, as well as to a serious economic problem. Beyond sovereignty and economy, justice and the public faith were endangered by those who falsified the currency. Yet, the thesis of this paper is that one cannot understand false money in the early modern period by reading texts of that time with today's understanding of false money in mind. The variety of falsifications and their interconnections appear especially when carefully reading the monetary discourses of Jean Bodin, Juan de Mariana, and John Locke. These authors developed arguments about the limits of political powers in the context of currency management. A general claim to counteract counterfeiting (as implemented by individuals) may conceal a claim to suppress any possibility of debasing, and even enhancing, currency (as decided by princes). Clarifying the monetary discourses on the topic and establishing a hierarchy between those dimensions help us understand why the false-money issue was first considered a matter of monetary justice by the prince himself. We identify the multiple dimensions of false money: counterfeiting, degradation of coins, debasement, and enhancement. Until the end of the seventeenth century, monetary instability impeded the development of production in the long run. Stabilizations, through a monetary revolution close to what had been proposed by Bodin, Mariana, and Locke, occurred between the end of the seventeenth and the beginning of the eighteenth century.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: link to full text
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Duke University Press in its journal History of Political Economy.

Volume (Year): 42 (2010)
Issue (Month): 2 (Summer)
Pages: 323-360

in new window

Handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:42:y:2010:i:2:p:323-360
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Duke University Press 905 W. Main Street, Suite 18B Durham, NC 27701

Phone: (919) 660-1800
Fax: (919) 684-8974
Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Philip Arestis & Peter Howells, 2002. "The 1520-1640 "Great Inflation": An Early Case of Controversy on the Nature of Money," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 24(2), pages 181-203, December.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:42:y:2010:i:2:p:323-360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Center for the History of Political Economy Webmaster)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.