IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v5y2024i1p7-135d1349622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Transdisciplinary Approach and Design Thinking Methodology: For Applications to Complex Problems and Energy Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Canan M. Ozsoy

    (Center for Energy, Environment and Economy (CEEE/ECEM), Ozyegin University, Cekmekoy, Istanbul 34794, Turkey)

  • M. Pinar Mengüç

    (Center for Energy, Environment and Economy (CEEE/ECEM), Ozyegin University, Cekmekoy, Istanbul 34794, Turkey)

Abstract

In this paper, we outline a transdisciplinary approach and design thinking methodology (TADTM) to tackle complex problems. Our premise is that these problems need a fundamental understanding of technological solutions and those for human interactions, business operations, financing, socioeconomic governance, legislation, and regulations. They must be approached by different decisionmakers from different disciplines to establish seamless interactions and structured teamwork. In this regard, we emphasize the need for a transdisciplinary framework that accounts for personal preferences based on human behavior as well as the traditional interdisciplinary frameworks. To test and prove our hypothesis, three case studies are discussed. Case Study 1 is based on our studies at a major medical establishment, and Case Study 2 is about the integrated engineering and architecture approach we used at our university campus. Case Study 3 is based on an ongoing project to lead industrial corporations to change their energy policies with practical energy efficiency measures and by adapting renewable/alternative energy adaptations for their operations. Developing creative solutions and strategies to decrease atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions requires such an energy transition framework and should involve every person, company, entity, and all governments. It can only be achieved with efforts on both local and global levels, which needs to convince (a) industries to change their traditional operation modalities, (b) people to alter their consumption behaviors, and (c) governments to change their rules, regulations, and incentives. The complexity and magnitude of this enormous task demand the coordination and collaboration of all stakeholders, as well as the need for technological innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Canan M. Ozsoy & M. Pinar Mengüç, 2024. "A Transdisciplinary Approach and Design Thinking Methodology: For Applications to Complex Problems and Energy Transition," World, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:5:y:2024:i:1:p:7-135:d:1349622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/5/1/7/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/5/1/7/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleksander Jakimowicz & Daniel Rzeczkowski, 2023. "Contact Zones in the Energy Transition: A Transdisciplinary Complex Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-48, April.
    2. Elizabeth Anne Eppel & Mary Lee Rhodes, 2018. "Complexity theory and public management: a ‘becoming’ field," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 949-959, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rapuano Violeta & Valickas Andrius, 2021. "Application of Complexity Theory to Organizational Career Management System’s Development," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 85(1), pages 47-64, June.
    2. Jeroen van der Heijden, 2022. "The Value of Systems Thinking for and in Regulatory Governance: An Evidence Synthesis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    3. Whetsell, Travis A, 2023. "On the Theory of the Pragmatic Public," SocArXiv 8ukmr, Center for Open Science.
    4. Yi Yang, 2021. "Critical realism and complexity theory: Building a nonconstructivist systems research framework for effective governance analysis," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 177-183, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:5:y:2024:i:1:p:7-135:d:1349622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.