IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3692-d1637924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Importance of Information Flow Relevant to Sustainable Forestry and the European Green Deal: The Case of Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Beata Sadowska

    (Department of Accounting, Institute of Economics and Finance, University of Szczecin, 70-453 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Piotr Szczypa

    (College of Economic and Social Sciences, Warsaw University of Technology Branch in Płock, 17 Łukasiewicza Street, 09-400 Płock, Poland)

  • Marek Wieruszewski

    (Department of Mechanical Wood Technology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 28 Wojska Polskiego, 60-637 Poznan, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Adamowicz

    (Department of Forestry Economics and Technology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 28 Wojska Polskiego, 60-637 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the conducted research was to develop a classification of relevant/sustainable information by indicating the links between relevant information and the various functions of forests, and to obtain information on the value of specific sustainable forestry information for users of reporting information. The specific objectives include indicating the weight of information regarding sustainable development contained in the 2030 Forestry Strategy. The research was carried out using the example of the State Forests of Poland in correlation with the actions and initiatives of the European Green Deal, identifying the enduring functions of sustainable forestry, and attempting to relate them to the relevant information disclosed in mandatory reporting. The research problem was formulated as the question: which information disclosed in reporting, including statistical data, is considered by information users to be the most useful? The study was implemented through the development of survey questionnaires aimed at examining the information needs of information users. The study employed the triangulation method, in particular: a literature analysis and critique, a logical analysis and construction, and the snowball sampling method. Triangulation ensures the reliability of the research approach as well as the acquisition of comprehensive and contextual knowledge about the given phenomenon. The results of the empirical research indicated which pieces of information disclosed in the reporting on the activities of the State Forests are particularly useful for internal stakeholders and which do not necessarily provide value and therefore may be omitted in reporting. The study presented in the article constitutes the first empirical study of its kind in Poland, conducted in the context of understanding and defining relevant information from the perspective of sustainable forestry. The study illustrates individual behaviors in the context of the information currently disclosed in correlation with their usefulness.

Suggested Citation

  • Beata Sadowska & Piotr Szczypa & Marek Wieruszewski & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2025. "The Importance of Information Flow Relevant to Sustainable Forestry and the European Green Deal: The Case of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3692-:d:1637924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3692/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3692/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Roth & Silvio Hildebrandt & Ulrich Walz & Wolfgang Wende, 2021. "Large-Area Empirically Based Visual Landscape Quality Assessment for Spatial Planning—A Validation Approach by Method Triangulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Jarosław Brożek & Anna Kożuch & Marek Wieruszewski & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2025. "Verification of the Assumptions of the Polish State Forest Policy in the Context of the New EU Forest Strategy 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Eva Eckert & Oleksandra Kovalevska, 2021. "Sustainability in the European Union: Analyzing the Discourse of the European Green Deal," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Jarosław Brożek & Anna Kożuch & Marek Wieruszewski & Roman Jaszczak & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2024. "Taxonomy Regulation as a New Instrument for the Sustainable Management of the Forest Environment in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Marek Wieruszewski & Aleksandra Górna & Katarzyna Mydlarz & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2022. "Wood Biomass Resources in Poland Depending on Forest Structure and Industrial Processing of Wood Raw Material," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Izabela Horzela & Sławomir Gromadzki & Jarosław Gryz & Tomasz Kownacki & Aneta Nowakowska-Krystman & Marzena Piotrowska-Trybull & Radosław Wisniewski, 2021. "Energy Portfolio of the Eastern Poland Macroregion in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Rasmi Meqbel & Mohammad Alta'any & Salah Kayed & Ahmed Al‐Omush, 2024. "Earnings management and sustainability assurance: The moderating role of CSR committee," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1769-1785, May.
    3. Radu Petrariu & Marius Constantin & Mihai Dinu & Simona Roxana Pătărlăgeanu & Mădălina Elena Deaconu, 2021. "Water, Energy, Food, Waste Nexus: Between Synergy and Trade-Offs in Romania Based on Entrepreneurship and Economic Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Joan Hereu‐Morales & Alba Segarra & César Valderrama, 2024. "The European (Green?) Deal: a systematic analysis of environmental sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 647-661, February.
    5. Silvio Cristiano & Samuele Zilio, 2021. "Whose Health in Whose City? A Systems Thinking Approach to Support and Evaluate Plans, Policies, and Strategies for Lasting Urban Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Ögçe, Hüseyin & Sarı, Elif Nur & Kaya, Meltem Erdem, 2024. "Assessing the visual landscape of Istanbul Bosphorus: Exploring the role of vegetation and built environment characteristics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Waldemar Izdebski & Michał Izdebski & Katarzyna Kosiorek, 2023. "Evaluation of Economic Possibilities of Production of Second-Generation Spirit Fuels for Internal Combustion Engines in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Michał Rejdak & Małgorzata Wojtaszek-Kalaitzidi & Grzegorz Gałko & Bartosz Mertas & Tomasz Radko & Robert Baron & Michał Książek & Sten Yngve Larsen & Marcin Sajdak & Stavros Kalaitzidis, 2022. "A Study on Bio-Coke Production—The Influence of Bio-Components Addition on Coke-Making Blend Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.
    9. Hsiao-Hsien Lin & Chih-Chien Shen & I-Cheng Hsu & Pei-Yi Wu, 2021. "Can Electric Bicycles Enhance Leisure and Tourism Activities and City Happiness?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, December.
    10. Zuzanna A. Lamenta & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2023. "Impact of the European Green Deal on Business Operations—Preliminary Benchmarking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    11. V. G. Kogdenko & N. A. Kazakova, 2023. "Substantiation of Parameters of Environmental Security and Sustainability of the Development of the Metallurgical Industry," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 115-123, February.
    12. Jelena Vapa Tankosić & Radivoj Prodanović & Vladimir Medović, 2023. "Analysis of Agri-Environmental Management Practices and Their Implementation in the Agricultural Policies of the Republic of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Farzad Kiani & Sajjad Nematzadeh & Fateme Aysin Anka & Mine Afacan Findikli, 2023. "Chaotic Sand Cat Swarm Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-47, May.
    14. Ivo Araújo & Leonel J. R. Nunes & David Patíño Vilas & António Curado, 2022. "Photovoltaic Production Management in a Hall of Residence with High Energy Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Anna Kożuch & Dominika Cywicka & Krzysztof Adamowicz & Marek Wieruszewski & Emilia Wysocka-Fijorek & Paweł Kiełbasa, 2023. "The Use of Forest Biomass for Energy Purposes in Selected European Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Shumin Zhang & Yongze Lv & Baolei Zhang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Green Development in the Yellow River Basin of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Jann Michael Weinand & Russell McKenna & Heidi Heinrichs & Michael Roth & Detlef Stolten & Wolf Fichtner, 2021. "Exploring the trilemma of cost-efficient, equitable and publicly acceptable onshore wind expansion planning," Papers 2106.15198, arXiv.org.
    18. Meng Cai, 2025. "Transforming Trade and Environment: Digital Trade's Impact on Carbon Emissions in the European Union," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 570-583, March.
    19. Chiara Colombi & Erminia D’Itria, 2023. "Fashion Digital Transformation: Innovating Business Models toward Circular Economy and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    20. Marek Wieruszewski & Katarzyna Mydlarz, 2022. "The Potential of the Bioenergy Market in the European Union—An Overview of Energy Biomass Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-23, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3692-:d:1637924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.