IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3521-d1634668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Global Framework for an Integrated Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Model in Quality, Safety and Environmental (QSE) Management Systems: Improving Environmental, Social and Economic Sustainability Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Zineb El Haouat

    (Higher School of Technology, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30050, Morocco)

  • Safaa Essalih

    (Higher School of Technology, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30050, Morocco)

  • Fatima Bennouna

    (National School of Applied Sciences, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30050, Morocco)

  • Driss Amegouz

    (Higher School of Technology, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30050, Morocco)

Abstract

A framework to include life cycle assessment (LCA) in the importance assessment of quality, safety and environmental (QSE) aspects of a management system has been studied to improve the sustainable development performance in the environmental, social and economic dimensions. But there is a literature gap where impact assessment is a critical factor. This research follows a mixed-methods approach, including a survey of 127 Moroccan companies to assess the adoption and impact of LCA integration. The survey’s findings show that 40% of companies have integrated LCA through significant advances in operational quality, regulatory compliance and sustainability performance. The findings also demonstrate how integration has enhanced long-term strategic decision-making, process optimization and environmental impact assessment. The proposed model aligns the requirements of sustainable LCA standards (ISO 14040/44, ISO 26000 and ISO 15686-5) with certifiable standards (ISO 14001, ISO 9001 and ISO 45001), addresses the opportunities and limitations of organizations during integration, and includes indicators for sustainability analysis. The study highlights how implementing LCA in QSE management creates a systematic approach to sustainability, particularly in terms of employee training, regular performance monitoring and regulatory compliance. In light of changing laws and industry norms, these findings provide a means for sectors to enhance their sustainability performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Zineb El Haouat & Safaa Essalih & Fatima Bennouna & Driss Amegouz, 2025. "Development of a Global Framework for an Integrated Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Model in Quality, Safety and Environmental (QSE) Management Systems: Improving Environmental, Social and Economic Sustai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-35, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3521-:d:1634668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3521/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3521/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christina Wulf & Jasmin Werker & Christopher Ball & Petra Zapp & Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs, 2019. "Review of Sustainability Assessment Approaches Based on Life Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-43, October.
    2. Kamble, Sachin S & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Parekh, Harsh & Mani, Venkatesh & Belhadi, Amine & Sharma, Rohit, 2022. "Digital twin for sustainable manufacturing supply chains: Current trends, future perspectives, and an implementation framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Louisa Pollok & Sebastian Spierling & Hans-Josef Endres & Ulrike Grote, 2021. "Social Life Cycle Assessments: A Review on Past Development, Advances and Methodological Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    4. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Robert Ulewicz & Malgorzata Ulewicz, 2024. "A Novelty Model Employing the Quality Life Cycle Assessment (QLCA) Indicator and Frameworks for Selecting Qualitative and Environmental Aspects for Sustainable Product Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Marwa Hannouf & Getachew Assefa, 2018. "A Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment-Based Decision-Analysis Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Piyarath Saosee & Boonrod Sajjakulnukit & Shabbir H. Gheewala, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Wood Pellet Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Thomas J. Straka & Patricia A. Layton, 2010. "Natural Resources Management: Life Cycle Assessment and Forest Certification and Sustainability Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia Muñoz López & Jose Luis Santolaya Sáenz & Anna Biedermann & Ana Serrano Tierz, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment of Product–Service Systems Using Flows between Systems Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Martin Kügemann & Heracles Polatidis, 2022. "Methodological Framework to Select Evaluation Criteria for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Road Transportation Fuels and Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Oluwaseun Nubi & Stephen Morse & Richard J. Murphy, 2022. "Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation from Municipal Solid Waste in Nigeria: A Prospective Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Tsega Y. Melesse & Chiara Franciosi & Valentina Di Pasquale & Stefano Riemma, 2023. "Analyzing the Implementation of Digital Twins in the Agri-Food Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Anni Orola & Anna Härri & Jarkko Levänen & Ville Uusitalo & Stig Irving Olsen, 2022. "Assessing WELBY Social Life Cycle Assessment Approach through Cobalt Mining Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Kristina Henzler & Stephanie D. Maier & Michael Jäger & Rafael Horn, 2020. "SDG-Based Sustainability Assessment Methodology for Innovations in the Field of Urban Surfaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, June.
    7. Louisa Pollok & Sebastian Spierling & Hans-Josef Endres & Ulrike Grote, 2021. "Social Life Cycle Assessments: A Review on Past Development, Advances and Methodological Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    8. He Yin & Hai Lan & Ying-Yi Hong & Zhuangwei Wang & Peng Cheng & Dan Li & Dong Guo, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of Shipboard Power Systems with New Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-44, February.
    9. Singh, Gaurvendra & Rajesh, R. & Misra, Subhas Chandra & Singh, Shubhendu, 2024. "Analyzing the role of digital twins in developing a resilient sustainable manufacturing supply chain: A grey influence analysis (GINA) approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    10. Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis, 2022. "Type I Social Life Cycle Assessments: Methodological Challenges in the Study of a Plant in the Context of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Jakub Jan Zięty & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2023. "External Environmental Costs of Solid Biomass Production against the Legal and Political Background in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, May.
    12. Sung, Kiseo & Park, Kyu-Tae & Lee, Hakyeon, 2024. "Landscaping the digital twin technology: Patent-based networks and technology reference model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    13. Zeug, Walther & Bezama, Alberto & Thrän, Daniela, 2020. "Towards a holistic and integrated Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of the bioeconomy: Background on concepts, visions and measurements," UFZ Discussion Papers 7/2020, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    14. Franco, Cintia Wilke & Benitez, Guilherme Brittes & Sousa, Paulo Renato de & Kliemann Neto, Francisco José & Frank, Alejandro G., 2024. "Managing resources for digital transformation in supply chain integration: The role of hybrid governance structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    15. Flávio Mattos & João Luiz Calmon, 2023. "Social Life Cycle Assessment in Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems with Contribution of Waste Pickers: Literature Review and Proposals for New Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Akshay Patidar & Monica Sharma & Rajeev Agrawal & Kuldip Singh Sangwan & Prabir Sarkar, 2024. "Building supply chain resilience in developing economies: A weighted Ishikawa diagram approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 363-386, March.
    17. Jung-Kyu Lee & Dongho Hong & Hyunkyu Chae & Dong-Hoon Lee, 2023. "Prediction of Storage Conditions to Increase the Bioenergy Efficiency of Giant Miscanthus Pellets Produced through On-Site Integrated Pretreatment Machines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Prisca Ayassamy & Robert Pellerin, 2023. "Social Life-Cycle Assessment in the Construction Industry: A Review of Characteristics, Limitations, and Challenges of S-LCA through Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Carlos Garcia-Velasquez & Yvonne van der Meer, 2021. "Can we improve the environmental benefits of biobased PET production through local 1 biomass value chains? A life cycle assessment perspective," Papers 2107.05251, arXiv.org.
    20. Magdalena Krysiak & Aldona Kluczek, 2021. "A Multifaceted Challenge to Enhance Multicriteria Decision Support for Energy Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3521-:d:1634668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.