IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2717-d1615462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Comfort Design in Underground Shopping Malls: A User-Centric Analysis of Spatial Features

Author

Listed:
  • Xingxing Zhao

    (Research Center for Underground Space, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, China)

  • Dongjun Guo

    (Research Center for Underground Space, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, China)

  • Yulu Chen

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Huanghuai University, Zhumadian 463000, China)

  • Yanhua Wu

    (Research Center for Underground Space, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, China)

  • Xingping Zhu

    (Research Center for Underground Space, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, China)

  • Chunhui Du

    (Research Center for Underground Space, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, China)

  • Zhilong Chen

    (Research Center for Underground Space, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, China)

Abstract

The expansion of urban underground spaces has broadened the range of urban activities by accommodating functions such as transportation, retail, and entertainment. Underground shopping malls (USMs) have been widely developed as a sustainable strategy to expand urban space capacity, alleviate surface congestion, and optimize land-use efficiency. However, the development and utilization of USMs often neglect user-centered evaluations, risking mismatches between design outcomes and long-term sustainability goals such as energy efficiency, user retention, and spatial adaptability. Therefore, this study analyzes 12 typical USMs in Nanjing, China, based on environmental psychology principles, employing mixed-methods research that combines objective measurements of spatial elements with subjective user perception surveys to establish a regression model investigating correlations between USM spatial–physical environments and user comfort perception. The results show that users generally have a positive impression of the current underground environment, but there are significant differences in their subjective perceptions of the different attributes of the USMs. The USMs present a trend of humanization, human culture, and landscape in terms of spatial characteristics. These improvements are critical for fostering long-term sustainable use by minimizing vacancy rates and retrofitting needs. The findings reveal that the human-centric comfort level of the USMs is largely determined by multi-dimensional architecture-space features, as well as personal and social activity level features. Building on these insights, we propose actionable strategies to advance sustainable USM design, prioritizing adaptive reuse, energy-efficient layouts, and culturally resonant esthetics. This work clarifies the direction of USM design optimization and improvement from the perspective of users’ subjective perception and provides a theoretical foundation for aligning underground development with global sustainability frameworks like the UN SDGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingxing Zhao & Dongjun Guo & Yulu Chen & Yanhua Wu & Xingping Zhu & Chunhui Du & Zhilong Chen, 2025. "Sustainable Comfort Design in Underground Shopping Malls: A User-Centric Analysis of Spatial Features," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2717-:d:1615462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2717/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2717/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giana Eckhardt, 2002. "Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organisations Across Nations," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 27(1), pages 89-94, June.
    2. Ryo Yamamoto & Atsushi Takizawa, 2019. "Partitioning Vertical Evacuation Areas in Umeda Underground Mall to Minimize the Evacuation Completion Time," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 209-225, October.
    3. Ying Cao & Lianghao Huang, 2023. "Research on the Healing Effect Evaluation of Campus’ Small-Scale Courtyard Based on the Method of Semantic Differential and the Perceived Restorative Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xue, Shengxi & Cao, Taiyun & Yu, Qianqian & Liu, Yuanyuan, 2024. "Clan culture and corporate cash holdings: Are private companies supported by informal institutions?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Jing Liu & Khairul Manami Kamarudin & Yuqi Liu & Jinzhi Zou & Jiaqi Zhang, 2022. "Developing a Behavior Change Framework for Pandemic Prevention and Control in Public Spaces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Muhammad Zahid Rafique & Nicolas Schneider & Umer Shahzad & Malin Song, 2022. "High‐tech industries, financial expansion, and low‐carbon energy deployment along the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1779-1795, December.
    4. Jun Zhang & Jinghua Jin & Yimeng Liang, 2024. "The Impact of Green Space on University Students’ Mental Health: The Mediating Roles of Solitude Competence and Perceptual Restoration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-28, January.
    5. Md. Zahid Alam & Syed Moudud-Ul-Huq & Md. Nazmus Sadekin & Mohamad Ghozali Hassan & Mohammad Morshedur Rahman, 2021. "Influence of Social Distancing Behavior and Cross-Cultural Motivation on Consumers’ Attitude to Using M-Payment Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Annett Reimer, 2005. "Die Bedeutung der Kulturtheorie von Geert Hofstede für das internationale Management," Wismar Discussion Papers 20/2005, Hochschule Wismar, Wismar Business School.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2717-:d:1615462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.