IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8596-d1757598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intergenerational Transmission of Collective Memory in Public Spaces: A Case Study of Menghe, a Historic and Cultural Town

Author

Listed:
  • Hairuo Wang

    (College of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China)

  • Baozhu Xie

    (School of Art & Design, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China)

  • Ying Zeng

    (School of Art & Design, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China)

  • Ankang Liu

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China)

  • Baozhong Liu

    (School of Art & Design, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China)

  • Lijuan Qin

    (College of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China)

Abstract

Historic and cultural towns are undergoing spatial restructuring and memory ruptures in the context of urban–rural transformation. Collective memory depends on the continuity of public space, with generational differences playing a key role in its transmission. This study uses Menghe Town in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, as a case to explore the role of public space in collective memory transmission through interviews, emotional mapping, and intergenerational co-construction analysis. The findings show the following: (1) Interviews and emotional mapping reveal that memories of traditional spaces like farmland have weakened, while emerging public spaces such as squares and walkways have become new memory nodes, reflecting a dynamic “carrying-transformation-reproduction” mechanism. (2) Intergenerational emotional mapping reveals that the transformation of spatial functions has driven the reconstruction of cultural identity, shifting villagers’ sense of place from clan and production-based spaces to modern public spaces. (3) Intergenerational emotional mapping and co-construction analysis reveal significant generational differences in memory perception and spatial use: the older generation relies on ancestral halls and farmland, the middle generation on factories and streets from the “agriculture-to-industry” period, and the younger generation on modern facilities like squares and schools. This study proposes the “Narrate—Preserve—Participate” model, explaining memory transmission across generations and offering insights for intergenerational collaboration and differentiated preservation in public space planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Hairuo Wang & Baozhu Xie & Ying Zeng & Ankang Liu & Baozhong Liu & Lijuan Qin, 2025. "Intergenerational Transmission of Collective Memory in Public Spaces: A Case Study of Menghe, a Historic and Cultural Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-33, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8596-:d:1757598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8596/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8596/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sedef Nur Cankurt Semiz & Fatma Ahsen Özsoy, 2024. "Transmission of Spatial Experience in the Context of Sustainability of Urban Memory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-36, November.
    2. Veljko Radulović & Aleksandra Terzić & Dragana Konstantinović & Miljana Zeković & Igor Peško, 2022. "Sustainability of Cultural Memory: Youth Perspectives on Yugoslav World War Two Memorials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Fatmaelzahraa Hussein & John Stephens & Reena Tiwari, 2020. "Memory for Social Sustainability: Recalling Cultural Memories in Zanqit Alsitat Historical Street Market, Alexandria, Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Valentina-Miriam Cittati & Jessica Balest & Dagmar Exner, 2022. "What Is the Relationship between Collective Memory and the Commoning Process in Historical Building Renovation Projects? The Case of the Mas di Sabe, Northern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Guangmeng Bian & Yan Zhao & Jianwei Yan, 2024. "Exploring Characteristics and Patterns of In Situ Space Morphology: Perspective of the Historical and Cultural Canal Settlement," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Eshrati, Dorna & Eshrati, Parastoo, 2022. "Urban conservation in the public eye: Evaluating the integrity achieved in the rehabilitation plan of Karim-Khan Zand Complex, Shiraz, Iran based on people’s perceptions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radmila Đurašinović & Miljana Zeković & Suzana Mitrović & Dragana Konstantinović & Sonja Pejić & Aleksandar Vemić, 2025. "Indeterminacy as a Framework for Sustainable Architecture: Lessons from Spens, a Socialist Megastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Yonggeng Xiong & Aibo Jin, 2025. "Spatial Gradient Effects of Landscape Pattern on Ecological Quality Along the Grand Canal," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Anuradha Chakrabarti & Reena Tiwari & Haimanti Banerji, 2021. "Migrants’ Narratives on Urban Governance: A Case from Kolkata, a City of the Global South," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8596-:d:1757598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.