IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8527-d1756135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indeterminacy as a Framework for Sustainable Architecture: Lessons from Spens, a Socialist Megastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Radmila Đurašinović

    (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Miljana Zeković

    (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Suzana Mitrović

    (Department for Environmental Protection and Improvement of the Institute of Forestry, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dragana Konstantinović

    (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Sonja Pejić

    (Department of Fundamentals Sciences, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Aleksandar Vemić

    (Department of Forest Protection of the Institute of Forestry, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

In the second half of the twentieth century, the concept of indeterminacy in architecture emerged to address the realities of chance and change, with the megastructure representing a critical point of this ambition. As the aims of indeterminate architectural approaches align with current sustainable development goals, this study hypothesises this design concept as the basis for the sustainability of structures built within its framework. Through a case study of Spens, a socialist megastructure in Novi Sad, Serbia, the paper explores the potentials of megastructures in relation to requirements for more sustainable cities. Firstly, it evaluates Spens’ current social sustainability through focus group discussions analysing sense of community, place, and wellbeing. Findings demonstrate a clear recognition of Spens’ spatial qualities among users. Secondly, the paper examines the future environmental sustainability of Spens, focusing on strategies that enhance user wellbeing and urban life as a point of overlap between social and environmental sustainability, using the Green Space Factor (GSF) and Urban Greening Factor (UFG). Results reveal the significant yet underutilised potential for greening. The paper highlights the long-term societal value of such structures and strategies for leveraging their concepts for their sustainable adaptation rather than replacement amid ongoing retrofit or replacement debates.

Suggested Citation

  • Radmila Đurašinović & Miljana Zeković & Suzana Mitrović & Dragana Konstantinović & Sonja Pejić & Aleksandar Vemić, 2025. "Indeterminacy as a Framework for Sustainable Architecture: Lessons from Spens, a Socialist Megastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-27, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8527-:d:1756135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8527/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8527/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monika Szopińska-Mularz & Anna Prokop & Milena Wikiera & Wiktoria Bukowy & Fredrik Forsman & Sol Vikström, 2025. "Adaptive Reuse of Urban Structures as a Driver of Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Veljko Radulović & Aleksandra Terzić & Dragana Konstantinović & Miljana Zeković & Igor Peško, 2022. "Sustainability of Cultural Memory: Youth Perspectives on Yugoslav World War Two Memorials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Efrat Eizenberg & Yosef Jabareen, 2017. "Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jolita Vveinhardt & Vilija Bite Fominiene & Regina Andriukaitiene, 2019. "“Omerta” in Organized Sport: Bullying and Harassment as Determinants of Threats of Social Sustainability at the Individual Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-31, April.
    2. Huilian Han & Hui Li, 2020. "Coupling Coordination Evaluation between Population and Land Urbanization in Ha-Chang Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Jubril Olakitan Atanda & Ayşe Öztürk, 2020. "Social criteria of sustainable development in relation to green building assessment tools," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 61-87, January.
    4. Maciej Piekarski & Łukasz Bajda & Ewelina Gotkowska, 2021. "Transformation of Socialist Realistic Residential Architecture into a Contemporary Sustainable Housing Habitat—General Approach and the Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Lea Primožič & Andreja Kutnar, 2022. "Sustainability Communication in Global Consumer Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Çağla Beyaz & Çilen Erçin, 2023. "Evaluation of Modern Architecture Criteria in the Context of Sustainability and Architectural Approach; Modern Period in North Nicosia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-48, June.
    8. Fernando Caixeta & André M. Carvalho & Pedro Saraiva & Fausto Freire, 2022. "Sustainability-Focused Excellence: A Novel Model Integrating the Water–Energy–Food Nexus for Agro-Industrial Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Pablo Bris & Félix Bendito, 2017. "Lessons Learned from the Failed Spanish Refugee System: For the Recovery of Sustainable Public Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-27, August.
    10. Gloria Janeth Murillo-Aviña & Sialia Karina Mellink-Méndez & Josué Aarón López-Leyva & Víctor Manuel Ramos-García, 2022. "Challenges and Opportunities Post Pandemic of Organizational Ergonomics to Promote the Social Sustainability in Cultural and Creative Industries: A Critical Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Sidsel Boldermo & Elin Eriksen Ødegaard, 2019. "What about the Migrant Children? The State-Of-The-Art in Research Claiming Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Ying Yan & Abdol Aziz Shahraki, 2023. "Exploring the Mutual Relationships between Public Space and Social Satisfaction with Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Vincent R. Nyirenda & Bimo A. Nkhata & Oscar Tembo & Susan Siamundele, 2018. "Elephant Crop Damage: Subsistence Farmers’ Social Vulnerability, Livelihood Sustainability and Elephant Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Yésica Gomez‐Jaramillo & Lina Berrouet & Clara Villegas‐Palacio & Linda Berrio‐Giraldo, 2024. "Conceptual framework for analyzing the sustainability of socio‐ecological systems with a focus on ecosystem services that support water security," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2298-2313, June.
    15. Juha Hämäläinen & Kaisa Pihlainen & Riitta Vornanen, 2020. "Sustainable Family Life and Child Welfare: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Byron Ioannou & Gregoris Kalnis & Lora Nicolaou, 2021. "Public Space at the “Palm of a Hand”: Perceptions of Urban Projects Through Digital Media," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 242-256.
    17. Jianglin Lu & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu, 2023. "Land Development Rights, Spatial Injustice, and the Economic Development in Net-Incremental Reduction Regions of Construction Land: Evidence from Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Agnieszka Świgost-Kapocsi, 2021. "200 Years of Feminisation of Professions in Poland—Mechanism of False Windows of Opportunity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Thi Huyen Le & Yoshinori Nakagawa & Yutaka Kobayashi, 2021. "Conditions under Which Rural-to-Urban Migration Enhances Social and Economic Sustainability of Home Communities: A Case Study in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Jean-Pierre Poulain & Elise Mognard & Jacqui Kong & Jan Li Yuen & Laurence Tibère & Cyrille Laporte & Fong-Ming Yang & Anindita Dasgupta & Pradeep Kumar Nair & Neethiahnanthan Ari Ragavan & Ismail Moh, 2023. "Much More Than Food: The Malaysian Breakfast, a Socio-Cultural Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8527-:d:1756135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.