IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8311-d1750774.html

Rethinking Accessibility: How Universal Design Is Shaping Rural Areas in Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Živilė Gedminaitė-Raudonė

    (Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences, Institute of Economics and Rural Development, 03220 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Monika Belhaj

    (Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences, Institute of Economics and Rural Development, 03220 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Population aging and the rising prevalence of disability are reshaping demographic dynamics worldwide, underscoring the need for inclusive environments that accommodate diverse functional abilities. While legal mandates for accessibility exist, structural and institutional barriers often hinder implementation. Universal Design (UD) provides a transformative framework that shifts the focus from individualized accommodations to systemic inclusion; however, its application in Lithuania, particularly in rural settings, remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by investigating the integration of UD principles in the Ignalina region, a rural Lithuanian locality experiencing pronounced demographic decline and aging. Using the design thinking model, this research examined how public institutions navigate UD implementation across the phases of empathization, definition, ideation, prototyping, and testing. The findings reveal both promising developments and persistent challenges. Community-engaged initiatives, such as micro-grants, volunteer services, and digital accessibility platforms, have begun to enhance service inclusivity. However, issues such as outdated infrastructure, unclear legislative guidelines, and funding limitations continue to constrain progress. This study concludes that UD can serve not only as a mechanism for promoting accessibility but also as a strategic tool for rural socio-economic resilience, contributing to the discourse on inclusive spatial planning and policy development in aging and diversifying societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Živilė Gedminaitė-Raudonė & Monika Belhaj, 2025. "Rethinking Accessibility: How Universal Design Is Shaping Rural Areas in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8311-:d:1750774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8311/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8311/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Indre Grazuleviciute-Vileniske & Lina Seduikyte & Armanda Teixeira-Gomes & Ana Mendes & Anatolijs Borodinecs & Deimante Buzinskaite, 2020. "Aging, Living Environment, and Sustainability: What Should be Taken into Account?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Ümran Duman & Buket Asilsoy, 2022. "Developing an Evidence-Based Framework of Universal Design in the Context of Sustainable Urban Planning in Northern Nicosia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-31, October.
    3. Pam Lee & William Cannon Hunter & Namho Chung, 2020. "Smart Tourism City: Developments and Transformations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Çağla Beyaz & Çilen Erçin, 2023. "Evaluation of Modern Architecture Criteria in the Context of Sustainability and Architectural Approach; Modern Period in North Nicosia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-48, June.
    2. Benedict Belobo Ateba & Prince Chuwuneme Enwereji, 2024. "The Resource Curse in the Gulf Region: Charting a Path for Long-term Economic Sustainability," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 259-270, September.
    3. Jiayu Zhou & Yerin Yhee & Eunmi Kim & Jin-Young Kim & Chulmo Koo, 2021. "Sustainable Tourism Cities: Linking Idol Attachment to Sense of Place," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Donglin Han & Huiying (Cynthia) Hou & Hao Wu & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Modelling Tourists’ Acceptance of Hotel Experience-Enhancement Smart Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Aleksejs Prozuments & Anatolijs Borodinecs & Guna Bebre & Diana Bajare, 2023. "A Review on Trombe Wall Technology Feasibility and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Elizabeth Wianto & Elty Sarvia & Chien-Hsu Chen, 2021. "Authoritative Parents and Dominant Children as the Center of Communication for Sustainable Healthy Aging," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Sebastian Seriani & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes & Paola Moraga & Fabian Cortes, 2022. "Experimental Location of the Vertical Handrail to Improve the Accessibility of Wheelchair Passengers Boarding and Alighting at Metro Stations—A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Hyunae Lee & Chulmo Koo & Namho Chung, 2025. "Assessing the economic effects of investment in smart tourism platform," Tourism Economics, , vol. 31(2), pages 263-284, March.
    9. Aleksejs Prozuments & Anatolijs Borodinecs & Diana Bajare, 2023. "Trombe Wall System’s Thermal Energy Output Analysis at a Factory Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    10. Yongchuan Li & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid & Raja Ariffin Raja Ghazilla, 2022. "Design Methods for the Elderly in Web of Science, Scopus, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure Databases: A Scientometric Analysis in CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Maria Papoui-Evangelou & Bogdana Nosova & Luca Salvati, 2023. "Smart ‘Tourist Cities’ Revisited: Culture-Led Urban Sustainability and the Global Real Estate Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, February.
    12. Huanhuan Hua & Amare Wondirad, 2020. "Tourism Network in Urban Agglomerated Destinations: Implications for Sustainable Tourism Destination Development through a Critical Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Valentina Ndou & Gioconda Mele & Eglantina Hysa & Otilia Manta, 2022. "Exploiting Technology to Deal with the COVID-19 Challenges in Travel & Tourism: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    14. Lin-Lin Xue & Ching-Cheng Shen & Alastair M. Morrison & Li-Wen Kuo, 2021. "Online Tourist Behavior of the Net Generation: An Empirical Analysis in Taiwan Based on the AISAS Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Luis Moreno-Izquierdo & Adrián Más-Ferrando & Marta Suárez-Tostado & Ana B. Ramón-Rodríguez, 2022. "Reinvención del turismo en clave de inteligencia artificial. Buscando un modelo sostenible y competitivo para el siglo XXI," Fedea Economy Notes 2022-19, FEDEA.
    16. Gaurab Das Mahapatra & Suguru Mori & Rie Nomura, 2023. "Interpreting Universal Mobility in the Footpaths of Urban India Based on Experts’ Opinion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Arie Herscovici & Gavriel Dahan & Gil Cohen, 2022. "Smart Cities and Tourism: The Case of Tel Aviv-Yafo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, September.
    18. Youssef El Archi & Brahim Benbba & Zhulduz Nizamatdinova & Yerlan Issakov & Gálicz Ivett Vargáné & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review Analysing Smart Tourism Destinations in Context of Sustainable Development: Current Applications and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Wenjing Xu & Mazran Ismail & Syafizal Shahruddin & Wen Quan & Yingrui Li, 2025. "Exploring Tourists’ Intentions to Adopt Augmented Reality in Cultural Heritage Museums: Insights From a Modified Technology Acceptance Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, May.
    20. Glykeria Myrovali & Maria Morfoulaki & Thomai Mpaltzi, 2023. "Can Destination Cards Help to Shape Areas’ Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8311-:d:1750774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.