IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p8041-d1743856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Co-Composting of Green Waste and Kitchen Waste at Different Ratios

Author

Listed:
  • Junhao Gu

    (The Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Green Waste in Hebei Province, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Suyan Li

    (The Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Green Waste in Hebei Province, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiangyang Sun

    (The Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Green Waste in Hebei Province, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Rongsong Zou

    (Comprehensive Experimental Center in Yellow River Delta of Chinese Academy of Forestry, Dongying 257000, China)

  • Binru Song

    (The Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Green Waste in Hebei Province, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Di Wang

    (The Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Green Waste in Hebei Province, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hui Wang

    (The Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Green Waste in Hebei Province, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yalin Li

    (The Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Green Waste in Hebei Province, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

With the rapid expansion of urban green spaces and the increasing amount of domestic waste, efficient and sustainable treatment of green waste (GW) and kitchen waste (KW) has become a pressing issue. Co-composting offers a green and low-carbon solution, yet a systematic understanding of its greenhouse gas (GHG) emission dynamics remains lacking. This study aims to investigate the impact of varying GW:KW ratios on GHG emissions during composting, in order to identify optimal mixing strategies and sup-port the development of low-carbon urban waste management systems. Six treatments with different GW:KW ratios (10:0, 9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 6:4, and 5:5) were evaluated under continuous aeration for 42 days. Results showed: (1) All treatments exhibited a typical composting temperature profile (mesophilic, thermophilic, cooling, maturation), with final seed germination index (GI) > 95% and significantly reduced E4/E6 ratios, indicating maturity. (2) When kitchen waste (KW) was ≤20%, cumulative GHG emissions slightly increased; KW ≥ 30% led to net reductions, with the 6:4 treatment (A4) achieving the highest decrease (17.44%) in total CO 2 -equivalent emissions. In conclusion, maintaining KW at 40–50% optimally balances compost maturity and emission reduction, providing a viable strategy for the high-value utilization of urban organic waste and carbon mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Junhao Gu & Suyan Li & Xiangyang Sun & Rongsong Zou & Binru Song & Di Wang & Hui Wang & Yalin Li, 2025. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Co-Composting of Green Waste and Kitchen Waste at Different Ratios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8041-:d:1743856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8041/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8041/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8041-:d:1743856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.