IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7562-d1729745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legume Proportion and Litter Deposition Rate in Signal Grass–Forage Peanut Mixed Pastures at Varying Planting Spacings

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas Ladeira Cardoso

    (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa-UFV, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil)

  • Igor Alexandre de Souza

    (Institute of Agricultural Science, University of the Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys (UFVJM), Unaí 38610-000, MG, Brazil)

  • Odilon Gomes Pereira

    (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa-UFV, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil)

  • Paulo Roberto Cecon

    (Statistics Department, Universidade Federal de Viçosa-UFV, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil)

  • Carlos Augusto de Miranda Gomide

    (National Dairy Cattle Research-EMBRAPA, Juiz de Fora 36038-330, MG, Brazil)

  • José Carlos Batista Dubeux

    (North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida-UF, Marianna, FL 32446, USA)

  • Karina Guimarães Ribeiro

    (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa-UFV, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil)

Abstract

Mixed legume–grass pastures may enhance nitrogen recycling via litter and excreta compared to unfertilized grass monocultures. This study evaluated litter biomass, litter deposition rate, and the chemical and isotopic composition of Urochloa decumbens litter in monoculture and mixed pasture intercropped with Arachis pintoi cv. Belmonte at five planting spacings (0.40, 0.50, 0.60, 0.70, and 0.80 m) in a Ferralsol. Additionally, isotopic analysis of sheep feces under grazing was conducted across the dry season. The experiment was conducted according to a split-plot scheme, with spacings in the plots and the periods or years in the subplots, in a randomized block design, with four replications. Litter biomass was not significantly influenced by planting spacing; however, the litter deposition rate was substantially greater in mixed pastures, reaching up to 77.2 kg ha −1 day −1 in the second year. Isotopic analysis revealed that up to 39% of the litter carbon was derived from C3 plants ( Arachis pintoi ), while nitrogen concentration ranged from 8.3 g kg −1 in monoculture to 12.9 g kg −1 at 0.40 m spacing. Spatial arrangement was critical for optimizing nutrients dynamic. Narrower planting spacings (0.40–0.50 m) increased the proportion of Arachis pintoi and enhanced litter deposition rates, improving nitrogen inputs and cycling within mixed Urochloa decumbens .

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas Ladeira Cardoso & Igor Alexandre de Souza & Odilon Gomes Pereira & Paulo Roberto Cecon & Carlos Augusto de Miranda Gomide & José Carlos Batista Dubeux & Karina Guimarães Ribeiro, 2025. "Legume Proportion and Litter Deposition Rate in Signal Grass–Forage Peanut Mixed Pastures at Varying Planting Spacings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7562-:d:1729745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7562/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7562/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamed Hemida Abd-Alla & Salem M. Al-Amri & Abdel-Wahab Elsadek El-Enany, 2023. "Enhancing Rhizobium –Legume Symbiosis and Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizer Use Are Potential Options for Mitigating Climate Change," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Calero Hurtado & Yanery Pérez Díaz & Kolima Peña Calzada & Jorge Félix Meléndrez Rodríguez, 2025. "Peanut Growth and Yield Responses Are Influenced by Plant Density, Microbial Consortium Inoculation, and Amino Acid Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justina Kaziūnienė & Audrius Gegeckas & Laura Lapinskienė & Kristyna Razbadauskienė & Raimonda Mažylytė & Skaidrė Supronienė, 2025. "Competitiveness and Nitrogen Fixation Efficiency Analysis of Rhizobium leguminosarum Strains in Different Field Pea ( Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Zongkun Li & Dandan Qi, 2025. "The Response Mechanism of Soil Microbial Carbon Use Efficiency to Land-Use Change: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Nimesha Senevirathne & Prasad Kaparaju, 2025. "Enhancing the Agronomic Value of Anaerobic Digestate: A Review of Current vs. Emerging Technologies, Challenges and Future Directions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-53, October.
    4. Eglė Didžiulytė & Rasa Šlinkšienė, 2025. "Use of Amino Acids and Organic Waste Extracts to Improve the Quality of Liquid Nitrogen–Calcium–Magnesium Fertilizers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-20, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7562-:d:1729745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.