IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7394-d1725438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Resource-Constrained Age-Friendly City Framework: A Mixed-Methods Study of Urban Aging in Bangkok, Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Anchalee Srikolchan

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok 10110, Thailand)

  • Chaiwatchara Promjittiphong

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok 10110, Thailand)

  • Chudech Losiri

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok 10110, Thailand)

  • Siriporn Dabphet

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok 10110, Thailand)

  • Nathaporn Thaijongrak

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok 10110, Thailand)

Abstract

The rapid demographic transition in middle-income countries creates unprecedented challenges for age-friendly urban development, as cities experience compressed aging within severe resource constraints—a phenomenon termed “getting old before getting rich.” This study develops a preliminary Resource-Constrained Age-Friendly City (RC-AFC) framework through empirical analysis of Bangkok’s urban aging challenges, addressing the need for context-specific approaches in resource-constrained environments. Using convergent parallel mixed-methods design, the research analyzed data from 1000 older adults and 195 multi-sectoral stakeholders to examine age-friendly service gaps and collaboration potential within Bangkok’s rapidly aging context. Importance-Performance Analysis revealed significant service disparities (average gap: 1.34) with Communication and Information (2.03), Housing (1.93), and Outdoor Spaces (1.78) identified as priority areas in Bangkok’s setting. The study proposes three initial RC-AFC principles based on Bangkok findings: Priority Hierarchy Adaptation suggesting systematic resource allocation approaches; Multi-Sectoral Resource Optimization indicating collaboration as structural necessity; and Leapfrog Innovation Potential demonstrating potential for constraint-driven solutions. This proof-of-concept study provides initial conceptual foundation specifically developed from Bangkok’s context, though systematic validation across different urban environments remains essential before any broader consideration. The research offers a Bangkok-derived starting point for understanding resource-constrained age-friendly development that requires substantial further testing and adaptation for application in other contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Anchalee Srikolchan & Chaiwatchara Promjittiphong & Chudech Losiri & Siriporn Dabphet & Nathaporn Thaijongrak, 2025. "Developing a Resource-Constrained Age-Friendly City Framework: A Mixed-Methods Study of Urban Aging in Bangkok, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7394-:d:1725438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7394/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7394/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melanie Davern & Rachel Winterton & Kathleen Brasher & Geoff Woolcock, 2020. "How Can the Lived Environment Support Healthy Ageing? A Spatial Indicators Framework for the Assessment of Age-Friendly Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jo-Ying Huang & Hui-Chuan Hsu & Yu-Ling Hsiao & Feng-Yin Chen & Shu-Ying Lo & Tzu-Yun Chou & Megan F. Liu, 2022. "Developing Indicators of Age-Friendliness in Taiwanese Communities through a Modified Delphi Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Tuochen Li & Siran Wang, 2021. "How to Improve the Public Trust of the Intelligent Aging Community: An Empirical Study Based on the ACSI Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Caterina Caramuta & Giovanni Longo & Paolo Zaramella, 2025. "A Composite Index to Assess Seniors’ Critical Mobility Dependence: The Case Study of Rural Northern Italian Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Joost van Hoof & Hannah R. Marston, 2021. "Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Hao Zhu, 2022. "Spatial Matching and Policy-Planning Evaluation of Urban Elderly Care Facilities Based on Multi-Agent Simulation: Evidence from Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Hannah R. Marston & Kelly Niles-Yokum & Paula Alexandra Silva, 2021. "A Commentary on Blue Zones ® : A Critical Review of Age-Friendly Environments in the 21st Century and Beyond," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-33, January.
    7. Huicheng Feng & Xiaoxiang Tang & Cheng Zou, 2024. "Optimizing the Layout of Service Facilities for Older People Based on POI Data and Machine Learning: Guangzhou City as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Ling Yang & Hsiao-Tung Chang & Jian Li & Xinyue Xu & Zhi Qiu & Xiaomin Jiang, 2023. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Friendliness of Urban Facilities for the Elderly in Taipei City and New Taipei City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Mildred E. Warner & Xue Zhang, 2020. "Healthy Places for Children: The Critical Role of Engagement, Common Vision, and Collaboration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Chunmei Zhang & Jun Yang, 2023. "Evaluation of the Quality of the Age-Friendly Environment in Liaoning Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Longduoqi A & Hang Ma & Mohan Wang & Biao Yang, 2022. "Research on Urban Community Elderly Care Facility Based on Quality of Life by SEM: Cases Study of Three Types of Communities in Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7394-:d:1725438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.