IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p7043-d1716574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Support Synergic Action for Transformation: Insights from Expert Practitioners and the Importance of Intentionality

Author

Listed:
  • Eugyen Suzanne Om

    (Department of Environment and Geography, Wentworth Way, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UK)

  • Ioan Fazey

    (Department of Environment and Geography, Wentworth Way, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UK)

  • David Tyfield

    (Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA14 YQ, UK)

  • Lee Eyre

    (Department of Environment and Geography, Wentworth Way, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UK)

  • Mick Cooper

    (Professor Mick Cooper School of Psychology, University of Roehampton, London SW15 5PJ, UK)

  • Esther Carmen

    (Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK)

  • Declan Jackson

    (Department of Environment and Geography, Wentworth Way, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UK)

  • James Fearnley

    (Department of Environment and Geography, Wentworth Way, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UK)

  • Luea Ritter

    (Collective Transitions, Baselstrasse 69b, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland)

  • Rebecca Newman

    (Department of Environment and Geography, Wentworth Way, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UK)

  • Stefan Cousquer

    (Hult Ashridge Executive Education, Hult International Business School, Ashridge House, Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire HP4 1NS, UK)

Abstract

A global poly-crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss, dwindling natural resources, geopolitical instability, among other complex challenges, is on the rise. Societal transformations are therefore imminent, whether intended or unintended. The key question is how to steward and facilitate such changes where fragmentation and siloed ways of working persist. The concept of synergies and the notion of synergic action could help overcome fragmented efforts to steer transformative changes. However, there exists a critical research gap in understanding the conditions needed to enable synergic action. This paper thus explores how synergic action is currently undertaken and the key essentials needed to deliver synergic action. The study uses a case study of the Yorkshire food system transformation to learn from its exemplar practitioners. The study used semi-structured interviews and a thematic analysis process to reach our two key findings. First, we highlight the three types of synergic action: (1) Non-systemic synergic action, (2) Non-systemic synergic action with multiple outcomes, and (3) Systemic synergic action. Differentiating types of synergic action can help identify where synergic action is already underway and guide more explicit efforts towards transformative change. The second key finding is the five essentials for synergic action, which are (1) leadership for synergic action; (2) networking, partnerships, and collaborations; (3) care and understanding; (4) a systems approach; and (5) intentionality for synergic action. This study brings to the fore the importance of intentionality, without which the first four essentials are less likely to coalesce. This is important to inform the reflection and learning of practitioners of systemic change about how they are currently and could be working more synergistically in the future, driven by clear intentionality.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugyen Suzanne Om & Ioan Fazey & David Tyfield & Lee Eyre & Mick Cooper & Esther Carmen & Declan Jackson & James Fearnley & Luea Ritter & Rebecca Newman & Stefan Cousquer, 2025. "How to Support Synergic Action for Transformation: Insights from Expert Practitioners and the Importance of Intentionality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7043-:d:1716574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7043/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7043/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Burch & Alison Shaw & Ann Dale & John Robinson, 2014. "Triggering transformative change: a development path approach to climate change response in communities," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 467-487, July.
    2. John Grin & Jan Hassink & Vanja Karadzic & Ellen H.M. Moors, 2018. "Transformative Leadership and Contextual Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Binbin Yang & Sang-Do Park, 2023. "Who Drives Carbon Neutrality in China? Text Mining and Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Busch, Henner & Ruggiero, Salvatore & Isakovic, Aljosa & Hansen, Teis, 2021. "Policy challenges to community energy in the EU: A systematic review of the scientific literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    3. Beau Warbroek & Thomas Hoppe, 2017. "Modes of Governing and Policy of Local and Regional Governments Supporting Local Low-Carbon Energy Initiatives; Exploring the Cases of the Dutch Regions of Overijssel and Fryslân," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-36, January.
    4. Kira J. Cooper & Robert B. Gibson, 2022. "A Novel Framework for Inner-Outer Sustainability Assessment," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Wan Amir Azlan Wan Haniff & Rahmah Ismail & Suzanna Mohamed Isa & Rozlinda Mohamed Fadzil & Syed Sagoff AlSagoff & Kartini Aboo Talib @ Khalid & Hakimi Hassan & Nurina Awanis Mohamed, 2020. "Childrens Toy Safety Standards in Malaysia and ASEAN: Towards Single Regional Regulation of Lead-Based Paints and Children Toys," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(9), pages 483-495, September.
    6. Castán Broto, Vanesa, 2017. "Urban Governance and the Politics of Climate change," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-15.
    7. Sheedy, Elizabeth & Zhang, Le & Tam, Kenny Chi Ho, 2019. "Incentives and culture in risk compliance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Daniel Nohrstedt & Jacob Hileman & Maurizio Mazzoleni & Giuliano Baldassarre & Charles F. Parker, 2022. "Exploring disaster impacts on adaptation actions in 549 cities worldwide," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Sujeetha Selvakkumaran & Erik O. Ahlgren, 2018. "Model-Based Exploration of Co-Creation Efforts: The Case of Solar Photovoltaics (PV) in Skåne, Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Chien-Heng Chou & Sa Ly Ngo & Phung Phi Tran, 2023. "Renewable Energy Integration for Sustainable Economic Growth: Insights and Challenges via Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-26, October.
    11. Hepburn, Cameron & Mealy, Penny, 2017. "Transformational Change: Parallels for addressing climate and development goals," INET Oxford Working Papers 2019-02, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, revised May 2019.
    12. Robert Newell & Colin Dring & Elvia Willyono, 2024. "Imagining Just and Sustainable Food Futures: Using Interactive Visualizations to Explore the Possible Land Uses and Food Systems Approaches in Revelstoke, Canada," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-33, August.
    13. Xinyu Sun & Amelia Clarke & Adriane MacDonald, 2020. "Implementing Community Sustainability Plans through Partnership: Examining the Relationship between Partnership Structural Features and Climate Change Mitigation Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Marc Wolfram & Niki Frantzeskaki, 2016. "Cities and Systemic Change for Sustainability: Prevailing Epistemologies and an Emerging Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Johannes Halbe & Claudia Pahl-Wostl, 2019. "A Methodological Framework to Initiate and Design Transition Governance Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, February.
    16. David Benjamin Billedeau & Juan Moreno-Cruz, 2022. "Defining and Advancing the Study and Practice of Sustainability Management," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-52, December.
    17. Tim Strasser & Joop de Kraker & René Kemp, 2019. "Developing the Transformative Capacity of Social Innovation through Learning: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda for the Roles of Network Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, March.
    18. F. Ignacio Aguilar & Robert B. Gibson, 2023. "Advancing a New Generation of Sustainability-Based Assessments for Electrical Energy Systems: Ontario as an Illustrative Application—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-26, August.
    19. Kristof Van Assche & Monica Gruezmacher & Raoul Beunen, 2022. "Why Governance Is Never Perfect: Co-Evolution in Environmental Policy and Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-7, August.
    20. Mendizabal, Maddalen & Heidrich, Oliver & Feliu, Efren & García-Blanco, Gemma & Mendizabal, Alaitz, 2018. "Stimulating urban transition and transformation to achieve sustainable and resilient cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 410-418.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7043-:d:1716574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.