IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p7041-d1716536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Risk Factors in the Renovation of Old Underground Commercial Spaces in Resource-Exhausted Cities: A Case Study of Fushun City

Author

Listed:
  • Kang Wang

    (School of Management, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China)

  • Meixuan Li

    (School of Management, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China)

  • Sihui Dong

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)

Abstract

Resource-exhausted cities have long played a key role in national energy development. Urban renewal projects, such as the renovation of old underground commercial spaces, can improve urban vitality and promote sustainable development. However, in resource-based cities, traditional industries dominate, while new industries such as modern commerce develop slowly. This results in low economic dynamism and weak motivation for urban development. To address this issue, we propose a systematic method for analyzing construction risks during the decision-making stage of renovation projects. The method includes three steps: risk value assessment, risk factor identification, and risk weight calculation. First, unlike previous studies that only used SWOT for risk factor analysis, we also applied it for project value assessment. Then, using the Work Breakdown Structure–Risk Breakdown Structure framework method (WBS-RBS), we identified specific risk sources by analyzing key construction technologies throughout the entire lifecycle of the renovation project. Finally, to enhance expert consensus, we proposed an improved Delphi–Analytic Hierarchy Process method (Delphi–AHP) to calculate risk indicator weights for different construction phases. The risk analysis covered all lifecycle stages of the renovation and upgrading project. The results show that in the Fushun city renovation case study, the established framework—consisting of five first-level indicators and twenty s-level indicators—enables analysis of renovation projects. Among these, management factors and human factors were identified as the most critical, with weights of 0.3608 and 0.2017, respectively. The proposed method provides a structured approach to evaluating renovation risks, taking into account the specific characteristics of construction work. This can serve as a useful reference for ensuring safe and efficient implementation of underground commercial space renovation projects in resource-exhausted cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Kang Wang & Meixuan Li & Sihui Dong, 2025. "Analysis of Risk Factors in the Renovation of Old Underground Commercial Spaces in Resource-Exhausted Cities: A Case Study of Fushun City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7041-:d:1716536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7041/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7041/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdulkarim K. Alhowaish & Fatimah S. Alkubur, 2025. "Unlocking the Potential of the Circular Economy at Municipal Levels: A Study of Expert Perceptions in the Dammam Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Kai Wang & Yuanyuan Feng & Hua Yang & Jun Deng & Quanfang Li, 2023. "Evaluation of Community Emergency Management Capability Based on SWOT Analysis—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Robert Krzysztofik & Oimahmad Rahmonov & Iwona Kantor-Pietraga & Weronika Dragan, 2022. "The Perception of Urban Forests in Post-Mining Areas: A Case Study of Sosnowiec-Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Arsić, Sanela & Nikolić, Djordje & Mihajlović, Ivan & Fedajev, Aleksandra & Živković, Živan, 2018. "A New Approach Within ANP-SWOT Framework for Prioritization of Ecosystem Management and Case Study of National Park Djerdap, Serbia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 85-95.
    5. John Ntema & Lochner Marais & Jan Cloete & Molefi Lenka, 2017. "Social disruption, mine closure and housing policy: evidence from the Free State Goldfields, South Africa," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(1), pages 30-41, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Miloradov & G. Eidlina, 2018. "Analysis of Tourism Infrastructure Development Projects in the Context of "Green Economy"," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 20-30.
    2. Oimahmad Rahmonov & Agnieszka Czajka & Ádám Nádudvari & Maria Fajer & Tomasz Spórna & Bartłomiej Szypuła, 2022. "Soil and Vegetation Development on Coal-Waste Dump in Southern Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Sesele, Kentse & Marais, Lochner & van Rooyen, Deidre, 2021. "Women and mine closure: A case study of policy in South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Rachel E. Bitoun & Gilbert David & Rodolphe Devillers, 2023. "Strategic use of ecosystem services and co‐benefits for Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1296-1310, June.
    5. Rhee, Sophia & Nyanza, Elias Charles & Condon, Madison & Fisher, Joshua & Maduka, Theresia & Benshaul-Tolonen, Anja, 2018. "Understanding environmental, health and economic activity interactions following transition of ownership in gold mining areas in Tanzania: A case of private to public," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 650-658.
    6. Valente José Matlaba & Maria Cristina Maneschy & Jorge Filipe dos Santos & José Aroudo Mota, 2019. "Socioeconomic dynamics of a mining town in Amazon: a case study from Canaã dos Carajás, Brazil," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 32(1), pages 75-90, April.
    7. Oimahmad Rahmonov & Weronika Dragan & Jerzy Cabała & Robert Krzysztofik, 2023. "Long-Term Vegetation Changes and Socioeconomic Effects of River Engineering in Industrialized Areas (Southern Poland)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Abdulkarim K. Alhowaish, 2025. "Toward the Adaptation of Green Bonds in the Saudi Municipal System: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Marais, Lochner & Denoon-Stevens, Stuart & Cloete, Jan, 2020. "Mining towns and urban sprawl in South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Hayati, Mohammad & Mahdevari, Satar & Barani, Kianoush, 2023. "An improved MADM-based SWOT analysis for strategic planning in dimension stones industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    11. Parvaneh Sobhani & Hassan Esmaeilzadeh & Isabelle D. Wolf & Marina Viorela Marcu & Michael Lück & Seyed Mohammad Moein Sadeghi, 2023. "Strategies to Manage Ecotourism Sustainably: Insights from a SWOT-ANP Analysis and IUCN Guidelines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Marais, Lochner & Matebesi, Sethulego & van der Watt, Phia, 2024. "Social licensing and dependencies: Implications for mine closure in South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Jovana Brankov & Jasna Micić & Jelena Ćalić & Jelena Kovačević-Majkić & Ranko Milanović & Tamás Telbisz, 2022. "Stakeholders’ Attitudes toward Protected Areas: The Case of Tara National Park (Serbia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, March.
    14. D'Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Imbert, Enrica & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "A Socio-economic Indicator for EoL Strategies for Bio-based Products," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    15. Iwona Kantor-Pietraga & Robert Krzysztofik & Maksymilian Solarski, 2023. "Planning Recreation around Water Bodies in Two Hard Coal Post-Mining Areas in Southern Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, July.
    16. Marais, Lochner & McKenzie, Fiona Haslam & Deacon, Leith & Nel, Etienne & Rooyen, Deidre van & Cloete, Jan, 2018. "The changing nature of mining towns: Reflections from Australia, Canada and South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 779-788.
    17. Stacchini, Annalisa & Guizzardi, Andrea & Mariotti, Alessia, 2022. "Smoothing down arbitrariness in planning: From SWOT to participatory decision making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    18. Owen, J.R. & Kemp, D. & Marais, L., 2021. "The cost of mining benefits: Localising the resource curse hypothesis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Monika Janiszek & Robert Krzysztofik, 2023. "Green Infrastructure as an Effective Tool for Urban Adaptation—Solutions from a Big City in a Postindustrial Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, June.
    20. Jamali, Narjes & Feylizadeh, Mohammad Reza & Liu, Peide, 2021. "Prioritization of aircraft maintenance unit strategies using fuzzy Analytic Network Process: A case study," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7041-:d:1716536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.