IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6554-d1704259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI in Biodiversity Education: The Bias in Endangered Species Information and Its Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Luis de Pedro Noriega

    (Facultad de Educación de Palencia, Universidad de Valladolid, 34004 Palencia, Spain)

  • Javier Bobo-Pinilla

    (Facultad de Educación y Trabajo Social, Universidad de Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Jaime Delgado-Iglesias

    (Facultad de Educación y Trabajo Social, Universidad de Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Roberto Reinoso-Tapia

    (Facultad de Educación y Trabajo Social, Universidad de Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Ana María Gallego

    (Facultad de Educación y Trabajo Social, Universidad de Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Susana Quirós-Alpera

    (Facultad de Educación y Trabajo Social, Universidad de Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

Abstract

The use of AI-generated content in education is significantly increasing, but its reliability for teaching natural sciences and, more specifically, biodiversity-related contents still remains understudied. The need to address this question is substantial, considering the relevance that biodiversity conservation has on human sustainability, and the recurrent presence of these topics in the educational curriculum, at least in Spain. The present article tests the existence of biases in some of the most widely used AI tools (ChatGPT-4.5, DeepSeek-V3, Gemini) when asked a relevant and objective research question related to biodiversity. The results revealed both taxonomic and geographic biases in all the lists of endangered species provided by these tools when compared to IUCN Red List data. These imbalances may contribute to the perpetuation of plant blindness, zoocentrism, and Western centrism in classrooms, especially at levels where educators lack specialized training. In summary, the present study highlights the potential harmful impact that AI’s cultural and social biases may have on biodiversity education and Sustainable Development Goals-aligned learning and appeals to an urgent need for model refinement (using scientific datasets) and teacher AI literacy to mitigate misinformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis de Pedro Noriega & Javier Bobo-Pinilla & Jaime Delgado-Iglesias & Roberto Reinoso-Tapia & Ana María Gallego & Susana Quirós-Alpera, 2025. "AI in Biodiversity Education: The Bias in Endangered Species Information and Its Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6554-:d:1704259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6554/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6554/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6554-:d:1704259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.