IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5990-d1690695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Assessment of Geological Hazards in Dawukou, Shizuishan City Based on the Information Value Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yongfeng Gong

    (Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Land and Resources Survey and Monitoring Institute, Ningxia 750002, China)

  • Shichang Gao

    (Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Land and Resources Survey and Monitoring Institute, Ningxia 750002, China)

  • Gang Zhang

    (Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Land and Resources Survey and Monitoring Institute, Ningxia 750002, China)

  • Guorui Wang

    (Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Land and Resources Survey and Monitoring Institute, Ningxia 750002, China)

  • Zheng He

    (Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Land and Resources Survey and Monitoring Institute, Ningxia 750002, China)

  • Zhiyong Hu

    (Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Land and Resources Survey and Monitoring Institute, Ningxia 750002, China)

  • Hui Wang

    (Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Land and Resources Survey and Monitoring Institute, Ningxia 750002, China)

  • Xiaofeng He

    (Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Land and Resources Survey and Monitoring Institute, Ningxia 750002, China)

  • Yaoyao Zhang

    (Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China)

Abstract

Geological hazards pose significant threats to ecological stability, human lives, and infrastructure, necessitating precise and robust risk assessment methodologies. This study evaluates geological hazard risks in Dawukou District, Shizuishan City, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, using the information value (IV) model. The study systematically identifies susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability factors influencing geological disaster risks by integrating diverse datasets encompassing geological conditions, meteorological parameters, and anthropogenic activities. The key findings reveal that hilly landforms, slope gradients, and vegetation indices are the dominant contributors to hazard development. Additional factors, including lithology, fault proximity, and precipitation, were also found to play critical roles. The results categorize the district into four risk zones: high-risk areas (1.55% of the total area), moderate-risk areas (10.16%), Low-risk areas (23.32%), and very-low-risk areas (64.97%). These zones exhibit a strong spatial correlation with geomorphic features, tectonic activity, and human engineering interventions, such as mining and infrastructure development. High-risk zones are concentrated near mining regions and fault lines with steep slopes, while low-risk zones are predominantly in flat plains and urban centers. The reliability of the risk assessment was validated through cross-referenced geological hazard occurrence data and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, achieving a high predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.88). The study provides actionable insights for disaster prevention, mitigation strategies, and urban planning, offering a scientific basis for resource allocation and sustainable development. The methodology and findings serve as a replicable framework for geological hazard risk assessments in similar regions facing diverse environmental and anthropogenic challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongfeng Gong & Shichang Gao & Gang Zhang & Guorui Wang & Zheng He & Zhiyong Hu & Hui Wang & Xiaofeng He & Yaoyao Zhang, 2025. "Risk Assessment of Geological Hazards in Dawukou, Shizuishan City Based on the Information Value Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5990-:d:1690695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5990/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5990/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riyanti Djalante & Cameron Holley & Frank Thomalla & Michelle Carnegie, 2013. "Pathways for adaptive and integrated disaster resilience," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(3), pages 2105-2135, December.
    2. Ghafar Salavati & Ebrahim Saniei & Ebrahim Ghaderpour & Quazi K. Hassan, 2022. "Wildfire Risk Forecasting Using Weights of Evidence and Statistical Index Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    3. M. Enenkel & M. E. Brown & J. V. Vogt & J. L. McCarty & A. Reid Bell & D. Guha-Sapir & W. Dorigo & K. Vasilaky & M. Svoboda & R. Bonifacio & M. Anderson & C. Funk & D. Osgood & C. Hain & P. Vinck, 2020. "Why predict climate hazards if we need to understand impacts? Putting humans back into the drought equation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1161-1176, October.
    4. Sala, Serenella & Ciuffo, Biagio & Nijkamp, Peter, 2015. "A systemic framework for sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 314-325.
    5. Yu Huang & Hualin Cheng, 2013. "The impact of climate change on coastal geological disasters in southeastern China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(1), pages 377-390, January.
    6. K. Joyce & S. Samsonov & S. Levick & J. Engelbrecht & S. Belliss, 2014. "Mapping and monitoring geological hazards using optical, LiDAR, and synthetic aperture RADAR image data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(2), pages 137-163, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parul Bhyan & Bhavna Shrivastava & Nand Kumar, 2023. "Systematic literature review of life cycle sustainability assessment system for residential buildings: using bibliometric analysis 2000–2020," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(12), pages 13637-13665, December.
    2. Zhengyao Liu & Jing Huang & Yonghong Li & Xiaokang Liu & Fei Qiang & Yiping He, 2025. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Geological Hazards Monitoring Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Ferreira, Ana & Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte & de Brito, Jorge & Mateus, Ricardo, 2018. "Combined carbon and energy intensity benchmarks for sustainable retail stores," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 877-889.
    4. Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová & Augustín Stareček & Dagmar Cagáňová & Martin Fero & Miloš Čambál, 2019. "Perceived Serviceability of Outplacement Programs as a Part of Sustainable Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Muhammad Riaz & Wojciech Sałabun & Hafiz Muhammad Athar Farid & Nawazish Ali & Jarosław Wątróbski, 2020. "A Robust q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information Aggregation Using Einstein Operations with Application to Sustainable Energy Planning Decision Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-39, May.
    6. Abdallah Alaoui & Moritz Hallama & Roger Bär & Ioanna Panagea & Felicitas Bachmann & Carola Pekrun & Luuk Fleskens & Ellen Kandeler & Rudi Hessel, 2022. "A New Framework to Assess Sustainability of Soil Improving Cropping Systems in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Oriana Gava & Fabio Bartolini & Francesca Venturi & Gianluca Brunori & Angela Zinnai & Alberto Pardossi, 2018. "A Reflection of the Use of the Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Agri-Food Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. David Tremblay & François Fortier & Jean‐François Boucher & Olivier Riffon & Claude Villeneuve, 2020. "Sustainable development goal interactions: An analysis based on the five pillars of the 2030 agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1584-1596, November.
    9. Joan Hereu-Morales & César Valderrama, 2022. "Towards a Sustainability-Based Society: An Analysis of Fundamental Values from the Perspective of Economics and Philosophy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Stephen C. L. Watson & Adrian C. Newton, 2018. "Dependency of Businesses on Flows of Ecosystem Services: A Case Study from the County of Dorset, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Victoria Vicario-Modroño & Rosa Gallardo-Cobos & Pedro Sánchez-Zamora, 2023. "Sustainability evaluation of olive oil mills in Andalusia (Spain): a study based on composite indicators," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6363-6392, July.
    12. Rui Meng & Lirong Zhang & Hongkuan Zang & Shichao Jin, 2021. "Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Integrated Benefits of Photovoltaic Poverty Alleviation Technology in the Sanjiangyuan Region of Qinghai Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Ileana Iocola & Frederique Angevin & Christian Bockstaller & Rui Catarino & Michael Curran & Antoine Messéan & Christian Schader & Didier Stilmant & Florence Van Stappen & Paul Vanhove & Hauke Ahneman, 2020. "An Actor-Oriented Multi-Criteria Assessment Framework to Support a Transition towards Sustainable Agricultural Systems Based on Crop Diversification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-29, July.
    14. Hamed Gholami & Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman & Safian Sharif & Jauharah Md Khudzari & Norhayati Zakuan & Dalia Streimikiene & Justas Streimikis, 2020. "A General Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Sheet Metalworking Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Sneha Kaira & Oz Sahin & Anisur Rahman & Sherif Mohamed, 2022. "An Integrated DPSIR-SD Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Roads in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-31, June.
    16. Nicholas A Cradock-Henry & Joanna Fountain & Franca Buelow, 2018. "Transformations for Resilient Rural Futures: The Case of Kaikōura, Aotearoa-New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Ferretti, Paola & Zolin, Maria Bruna & Ferraro, Giacomo, 2020. "Relationships among sustainability dimensions: evidence from an Alpine area case study using Dominance-based Rough Set Approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    18. Firas M. Sharaf, 2023. "Assessment of Urban Sustainability—The Case of Amman City in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Eleni Iacovidou & Jonathan Busch & John N. Hahladakis & Helen Baxter & Kok Siew Ng & Ben M. J. Herbert, 2017. "A Parameter Selection Framework for Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Shiyao Zhu & Haibo Feng, 2025. "Strengthening Climate Resilience Through Urban Policy: A Mixed-Method Framework with Case Study Insights," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5990-:d:1690695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.