IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5913-d1688626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon and Water Footprint Assessment of a Pea Snack

Author

Listed:
  • Josemi G. Penalver

    (Institute for Sustainability & Food Chain Innovation (IS-FOOD), Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Jerónimo de Ayanz Building, Arrosadia Campus, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
    Agronomy, Biotechnology and Food Department, Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Arrosadia Campus, 31006 Pamplona, Spain)

  • Maria Jose Beriain

    (Institute for Sustainability & Food Chain Innovation (IS-FOOD), Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Jerónimo de Ayanz Building, Arrosadia Campus, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
    Agronomy, Biotechnology and Food Department, Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Arrosadia Campus, 31006 Pamplona, Spain)

  • Paloma Vírseda

    (Institute for Sustainability & Food Chain Innovation (IS-FOOD), Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Jerónimo de Ayanz Building, Arrosadia Campus, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
    Agronomy, Biotechnology and Food Department, Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Arrosadia Campus, 31006 Pamplona, Spain)

  • Maite M. Aldaya

    (Institute for Sustainability & Food Chain Innovation (IS-FOOD), Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Jerónimo de Ayanz Building, Arrosadia Campus, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
    Science Department, Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Arrosadia Campus, 31006 Pamplona, Spain)

Abstract

The agri-food sector in Navarra, Spain, is exploring alternative protein sources like pea protein due to concerns regarding the environmental impacts and allergenic properties of traditional options like soy. This study aimed to evaluate a pea-based snack using carbon footprint and water footprint methodologies to assess the environmental performance of pea extrusion. The carbon footprint of the pea snacks was found to be 0.12 kg of CO 2 e per 100 g of packaged product. The water footprint was 174 L per 100 g of packaged product, with the blue water footprint accounting for the largest share (52%), followed by green (47%) and grey (1%) water footprints. Strategies such as minimizing ingredient loss and switching to renewable electricity could potentially reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 17% and green water consumption by 3%. Regarding alternative protein matrices, pea extrusion utilized 225 L of water per 150 g of extrudate, primarily as green water, demonstrating a lower dependence on blue and grey water compared to soy-based alternatives, suggesting its suitability for blue water-scarce regions. The carbon and water footprint assessments highlight the potential of pea protein as a regionally suitable, low-impact alternative to soy in terms of both carbon and water use.

Suggested Citation

  • Josemi G. Penalver & Maria Jose Beriain & Paloma Vírseda & Maite M. Aldaya, 2025. "Carbon and Water Footprint Assessment of a Pea Snack," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5913-:d:1688626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5913/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5913/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5913-:d:1688626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.