IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5738-d1684710.html

Advancing Cosmetic Sustainability: Upcycling for a Circular Product Life Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Ana M. Martins

    (Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Ana T. Silva

    (Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Joana M. Marto

    (Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

The cosmetics industry is undergoing a transformative shift toward sustainability due to growing consumer demand for eco-friendly products and the urgent need to reduce environmental impact. Challenges exist at every phase of a product’s life cycle, requiring effective strategies to drive sustainability. Upcycling—the repurposing of byproduct waste materials or useless products—emerges as a powerful strategy to advance circularity, minimize waste, and conserve resources. Central to this process is sustainable ingredient sourcing, particularly the use of agro-food industry waste and byproducts, which often contain high-value bioactive compounds suitable for cosmetic applications. Beyond sourcing, other upcycling strategies can be applied across the cosmetic life cycle, such as optimizing production, valorizing post-consumer plastic waste, and reducing carbon footprint through innovative practices such as carbon dioxide capture and repurposing. This review explores the role of upcycling and other sustainable practices in reshaping the cosmetics industry, from product design to post-consumer use. It also underscores the importance of consumer education on sustainable consumption to promote responsible beauty practices. The findings highlight how upcycling and other sustainability approaches can significantly reduce the industry’s environmental footprint. For long-term sustainability, the study recommends continued innovation in waste valorization, resource optimization, and consumer education, ensuring a holistic approach to reducing cosmetics’ environmental footprint throughout their life cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana M. Martins & Ana T. Silva & Joana M. Marto, 2025. "Advancing Cosmetic Sustainability: Upcycling for a Circular Product Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-28, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5738-:d:1684710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5738/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5738/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williams Chibueze Munonye, 2025. "Integrating Circular Economy Principles in Business Strategies: a Policy-Driven Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 1887-1896, June.
    2. Riccardo Tiscini & Laura Martiniello & Rosa Lombardi, 2022. "Circular economy and environmental disclosure in sustainability reports: Empirical evidence in cosmetic companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 892-907, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hea Young Lim & Ki Han Kwon, 2023. "Sustainable Assessment of the Environmental Activities of Major Cosmetics and Personal Care Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Sarmistha Mishra & Dukhabandhu Sahoo & Souryabrata Mohapatra, 2025. "Barriers to Circular Economy Adoption in MSMEs: a WINGS Analysis of Challenges in Developing Economies," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(6), pages 4919-4944, November.
    3. Vitiana L'Abate & Nicola Raimo & Francesco Albergo & Filippo Vitolla, 2024. "Social media to disseminate circular economy information. An empirical analysis on Twitter," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 528-539, January.
    4. Christof Falkenberg & Carina Schneeberger & Siegfried Pöchtrager, 2023. "Is Sustainability Reporting Promoting a Circular Economy? Analysis of Companies’ Sustainability Reports in the Agri-Food Sector in the Scope of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and EU Taxonomy Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Vitiana L'Abate & Nicola Raimo & Benedetta Esposito & Filippo Vitolla, 2024. "Examining the impact of circular economy disclosure on the cost of debt: A signaling theory approach via social media," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4007-4019, September.
    6. Prabjot Kaur & Supriyo Roy & Gagandeep Kaur, 2025. "Circular Economy Practices: A Case with Priority Selection Under Multi-Criteria Decision-Making," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(6), pages 4773-4799, November.
    7. Alice Mondello & Roberta Salomone & Giovanni Mondello, 2025. "Circular Economy in the Cosmetic Sector: Insights from Selected Italian Companies," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 2703-2723, August.
    8. L'Abate, Vitiana & Raimo, Nicola & Vitolla, Filippo, 2023. "Circular Economy Disclosure through Social Media: An Empirical Analysis on Twitter," EconStor Conference Papers 279493, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    9. Sirui Dong & Ya He & Haonan Chen, 2025. "The Impacts and Mechanisms of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Corporate Exports: With Reference to the Moderating Effect of Environmental Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-29, May.
    10. Ilyas Masudin & Mudrifah Mudrifah & Fien Zulfikarijah, 2026. "Circular Economy as a Catalyst: Exploring the Impact of Green Training and High-Performance Work Systems (HPWS) on Sustainable Performance," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, February.
    11. Sarfraz Nazir & Federica Doni, 2024. "Nexus of circular economy R0 to R9 principles in integrated reporting: Insights from a multiple case study comparison," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4058-4085, July.
    12. Hüseyin Hussein Keke & Christian Meske & Christiane Lehrer, 2026. "Understanding User Motivations for E-waste Return: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-25, April.
    13. Filip Skärin & Carin Rösiö & Ann-Louise Andersen, 2022. "An Explorative Study of Circularity Practices in Swedish Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Filippo Vitolla & Vitiana L’Abate & Felice Petruzzella & Nicola Raimo & Antonio Salvi, 2023. "Circular Economy Disclosure in Sustainability Reporting: The Effect of Firm Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Saumyaranjan Sahoo & Anil Kumar & Arvind Upadhyay, 2023. "How do green knowledge management and green technology innovation impact corporate environmental performance? Understanding the role of green knowledge acquisition," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 551-569, January.
    16. Matteo Pozzoli & Raffaela Nastari & Sabrina Pisano & Marco Venuti, 2023. "How Circular Economy Disclosure Responds to Institutional Determinants Empirical Evidences in Non-Financial European Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Williams Chibueze Munonye, 2025. "Towards Circular Economy Metrics: a Systematic Review," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(5), pages 4093-4135, October.
    18. Iñaki Heras‐Saizarbitoria & Olivier Boiral & Francesco Testa, 2023. "Circular economy at the company level: An empirical study based on sustainability reports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2307-2317, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5738-:d:1684710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.