IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5454-d1678297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An XGBoost-Based Machine Learning Approach to Simulate Carbon Metrics for Forest Harvest Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Bibek Subedi

    (FORAC Research Consortium, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
    Department of Wood and Forest Sciences, Pavillon Abitibi-Price, Université Laval, 2405, rue de la Terrasse, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
    Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise Networks, Logistics and Transportation (CIRRELT), Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

  • Alexandre Morneau

    (FORAC Research Consortium, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
    Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise Networks, Logistics and Transportation (CIRRELT), Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

  • Luc LeBel

    (FORAC Research Consortium, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
    Department of Wood and Forest Sciences, Pavillon Abitibi-Price, Université Laval, 2405, rue de la Terrasse, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
    Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise Networks, Logistics and Transportation (CIRRELT), Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

  • Shuva Gautam

    (FORAC Research Consortium, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
    Department of Wood and Forest Sciences, Pavillon Abitibi-Price, Université Laval, 2405, rue de la Terrasse, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
    Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise Networks, Logistics and Transportation (CIRRELT), Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

  • Guillaume Cyr

    (Bureau du Forestier en Chef, Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et Forêts, Quebec, QC G1P 3W8, Canada)

  • Roxanne Tremblay

    (Bureau du Forestier en Chef, Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et Forêts, Quebec, QC G1P 3W8, Canada)

  • Jean-François Carle

    (Bureau du Forestier en Chef, Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et Forêts, Quebec, QC G1P 3W8, Canada)

Abstract

It has become increasingly important to incorporate carbon metrics in the forest harvest planning process. The Generic Carbon Budget Model (GCBM) is a well-recognized tool to evaluate the potential impact of management decisions on carbon sequestration and storage, supporting sustainable forest management planning. Although GCBM is effective in carbon budgeting and estimating carbon metrics, its computational complexity makes it difficult to integrate into forest planning with multiple scenarios. In this regard, this study proposes using machine algorithms to expedite the output generated by GCBM. XGBoost was implemented to estimate the carbon pool and NEP in managed forests of Quebec. Furthermore, polynomial regression was also implemented to serve as a validation benchmark. Datasets with total sizes of 13.53 million and 7.56 million samples were compiled for NEP and carbon pool forecasting to run the model. The results indicate that XGBoost was able to accurately replicate the performance of the GCBM model for both NEP forecasting (R 2 = 0.883) and carbon pool estimation (R 2 = 0.967 for aboveground biomass). Although machine learning approaches are comparatively faster, GCBM still offers better accuracy. Hence, the decision on which method to use, either machine learning or GCBM, should be dictated by the specific objectives and the constraints of the project.

Suggested Citation

  • Bibek Subedi & Alexandre Morneau & Luc LeBel & Shuva Gautam & Guillaume Cyr & Roxanne Tremblay & Jean-François Carle, 2025. "An XGBoost-Based Machine Learning Approach to Simulate Carbon Metrics for Forest Harvest Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5454-:d:1678297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5454/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5454/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong, Lingbo & Lu, Wei & Liu, Zhaogang, 2018. "Developing alternative forest spatial management plans when carbon and timber values are considered: A real case from northeastern China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 385(C), pages 45-57.
    2. Böttcher, Hannes & Freibauer, Annette & Obersteiner, Michael & Schulze, Ernst-Detlef, 2008. "Uncertainty analysis of climate change mitigation options in the forestry sector using a generic carbon budget model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 45-62.
    3. Richard Church & Alan Murray & Klaus Barber, 2000. "Forest planning at the tactical level," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 3-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zell, Jürgen & Kändler, Gerald & Hanewinkel, Marc, 2009. "Predicting constant decay rates of coarse woody debris—A meta-analysis approach with a mixed model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(7), pages 904-912.
    2. Lars Sängstuvall & Tomas Lämås & Tomas Nordfjell, 2014. "Application of a primarily deductive framework describing time consumption for hauling of logs to road-side," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 477-489, August.
    3. H. Böttcher & A. Freibauer & Y. Scholz & V. Gitz & Philippe Ciais & M. Mund & T. Wutzler & E.-D. Schulze, 2012. "Setting priorities for land management to mitigate climate change," Post-Print hal-00716172, HAL.
    4. Bellassen, V. & le Maire, G. & Guin, O. & Dhôte, J.F. & Ciais, P. & Viovy, N., 2011. "Modelling forest management within a global vegetation model—Part 2: Model validation from a tree to a continental scale," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 57-75.
    5. Nabhani, Abbas & Mardaneh, Elham & Sjølie, Hanne K., 2024. "Multi-objective optimization of forest ecosystem services under uncertainty," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 494(C).
    6. Braun, Martin & Winner, Georg & Schwarzbauer, Peter & Stern, Tobias, 2016. "Apparent Half-Life-Dynamics of Harvested Wood Products (HWPs) in Austria: Development and analysis of weighted time-series for 2002 to 2011," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 28-34.
    7. Lee, Jongyeol & Kim, Hyungsub & Song, Cholho & Kim, Gang Sun & Lee, Woo-Kyun & Son, Yowhan, 2020. "Determining economically viable forest management option with consideration of ecosystem services in Korea: A strategy after successful national forestation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    8. Bellassen, V. & Le Maire, G. & Dhôte, J.F. & Ciais, P. & Viovy, N., 2010. "Modelling forest management within a global vegetation model—Part 1: Model structure and general behaviour," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(20), pages 2458-2474.
    9. Pilli, Roberto & Grassi, Giacomo & Kurz, Werner A. & Smyth, Carolyn E. & Blujdea, Viorel, 2013. "Application of the CBM-CFS3 model to estimate Italy's forest carbon budget, 1995–2020," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 144-171.
    10. Andrés Weintraub & Carlos Romero, 2006. "Operations Research Models and the Management of Agricultural and Forestry Resources: A Review and Comparison," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 446-457, October.
    11. Anthony G. Patt & Elke U. Weber, 2014. "Perceptions and communication strategies for the many uncertainties relevant for climate policy," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 219-232, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5454-:d:1678297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.