IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4972-d1666804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizen Science as a Monitoring Tool in Aquatic Ecology: Trends, Gaps, and Future Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Helton Luis Nina Lameira

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociedade, Natureza e Desenvolvimento (PPGSND), Instituto de Biodiversidade e Florestas (IBEF), Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA), Vera Paz Street, s/n (Tapajós Unit), Salé District, Santarém 68040-255, Pará, Brazil
    Laboratório de Estudos de Impacto Ambiental (LEIA), Instituto de Ciências e Tecnologia das Águas (ICTA), Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA), Vera Paz Street, s/n (Tapajós Unit), Salé District, Santarém 68040-255, Pará, Brazil)

  • Mayerly Alexandra Guerrero-Moreno

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociedade, Natureza e Desenvolvimento (PPGSND), Instituto de Biodiversidade e Florestas (IBEF), Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA), Vera Paz Street, s/n (Tapajós Unit), Salé District, Santarém 68040-255, Pará, Brazil
    Laboratório de Estudos de Impacto Ambiental (LEIA), Instituto de Ciências e Tecnologia das Águas (ICTA), Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA), Vera Paz Street, s/n (Tapajós Unit), Salé District, Santarém 68040-255, Pará, Brazil)

  • Everton Cruz da Silva

    (Laboratório de Estudos de Impacto Ambiental (LEIA), Instituto de Ciências e Tecnologia das Águas (ICTA), Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA), Vera Paz Street, s/n (Tapajós Unit), Salé District, Santarém 68040-255, Pará, Brazil
    Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia (PPGECO), Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, Pará, Brazil)

  • Fernando Abreu Oliveira

    (Laboratório de Estudos de Impacto Ambiental (LEIA), Instituto de Ciências e Tecnologia das Águas (ICTA), Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA), Vera Paz Street, s/n (Tapajós Unit), Salé District, Santarém 68040-255, Pará, Brazil)

  • Maria Alexandra Teodósio

    (Centro de Ciências do Mar (CCMAR), Universidade do Algarve (UAlg), Gambelas Campus, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal)

  • Karina Dias-Silva

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia (PPGECO), Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, Pará, Brazil
    Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação (LABECO), Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas (FCB), Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Altamira 68372-040, Pará, Brazil)

  • James Ferreira Moura

    (Instituto de Humanidades (IH), Universidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia Afro-Brasileira (UNILAB), Redenção 62790-000, Ceará, Brazil)

  • Leandro Juen

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia (PPGECO), Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, Pará, Brazil
    Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação (LABECO), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB), Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, Pará, Brazil)

  • José Max Barbosa Oliveira-Junior

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociedade, Natureza e Desenvolvimento (PPGSND), Instituto de Biodiversidade e Florestas (IBEF), Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA), Vera Paz Street, s/n (Tapajós Unit), Salé District, Santarém 68040-255, Pará, Brazil
    Laboratório de Estudos de Impacto Ambiental (LEIA), Instituto de Ciências e Tecnologia das Águas (ICTA), Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA), Vera Paz Street, s/n (Tapajós Unit), Salé District, Santarém 68040-255, Pará, Brazil)

Abstract

Aquatic ecosystems are essential for biodiversity and ecosystem services, but anthropogenic pressures threaten them. In this context, citizen science has emerged as an innovative strategy for biodiversity conservation and environmental monitoring. We conducted a scientometric analysis to identify patterns and gaps in the scientific literature on citizen science in aquatic ecology. We analyzed 185 articles published between 2003 and 2024 on the Web of Science and Scopus databases, with the highest number of publications on the topic (15.14%) in 2023. The United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom were the most productive and frequently studied countries. Studies focused on marine ecosystems (50.28%), while freshwater environments, such as rivers (12.99%), remain under-represented. Taxonomic groups such as fish (30.64%) and aquatic mammals (13.87%) were most commonly studied. The focus of monitoring was on ecology and species conservation. The projects adopted a contributory model of citizen engagement (92.97%), with a predominance of urban citizens (60.51%). Participants were trained through online platforms (25.75%) and in-person courses (21.56%), while communication methods involved sharing photos and videos (38.77%) and online uploads (23.79%). Therefore, expanding studies on freshwater ecosystems and rural and traditional communities, and integrating different levels of citizen participation, is essential.

Suggested Citation

  • Helton Luis Nina Lameira & Mayerly Alexandra Guerrero-Moreno & Everton Cruz da Silva & Fernando Abreu Oliveira & Maria Alexandra Teodósio & Karina Dias-Silva & James Ferreira Moura & Leandro Juen & Jo, 2025. "Citizen Science as a Monitoring Tool in Aquatic Ecology: Trends, Gaps, and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4972-:d:1666804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4972/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4972/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mingers, John & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2015. "A review of theory and practice in scientometrics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 1-19.
    2. Philippe Mongeon & Adèle Paul-Hus, 2016. "The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 213-228, January.
    3. Hossein Vahidi & Mohammad Taleai & Wanglin Yan & Rajib Shaw, 2021. "Digital Citizen Science for Responding to COVID-19 Crisis: Experiences from Iran," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-34, September.
    4. Gheorghe-Gavrilă Hognogi & Monika Meltzer & Filip Alexandrescu & Lucrina Ștefănescu, 2023. "The role of citizen science mobile apps in facilitating a contemporary digital agora," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Daniela De Filippo & María Luisa Lascurain & Andres Pandiella-Dominique & Elias Sanz-Casado, 2020. "Scientometric Analysis of Research in Energy Efficiency and Citizen Science through Projects and Publications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Benjamin M. Kraemer & Rachel M. Pilla & R. Iestyn Woolway & Orlane Anneville & Syuhei Ban & William Colom-Montero & Shawn P. Devlin & Martin T. Dokulil & Evelyn E. Gaiser & K. David Hambright & Dag O., 2021. "Climate change drives widespread shifts in lake thermal habitat," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(6), pages 521-529, June.
    7. Wandicleia Lopes de Sousa & Diego Maia Zacardi & Thiago Almeida Vieira, 2022. "Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Fishermen: People Contributing towards Environmental Preservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, April.
    8. Pavol Prokop & Rudolf Masarovič & Sandra Hajdúchová & Zuzana Ježová & Martina Zvaríková & Peter Fedor, 2022. "Prioritisation of Charismatic Animals in Major Conservation Journals Measured by the Altmetric Attention Score," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Lutz Bornmann, 2015. "Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(3), pages 1123-1144, June.
    10. Scott Jasechko & Hansjörg Seybold & Debra Perrone & Ying Fan & Mohammad Shamsudduha & Richard G. Taylor & Othman Fallatah & James W. Kirchner, 2024. "Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally," Nature, Nature, vol. 625(7996), pages 715-721, January.
    11. Maria Eugenia Ibarraran & Romeo A. Saldana-Vazquez & Tamara Perez-Garcia, 2021. "The Cost of Pollution in the Upper Atoyac River Basin: A Systematic Review," Papers 2103.00095, arXiv.org.
    12. Michalis A. Vasiliades & Andreas Ch. Hadjichambis & Demetra Paraskeva-Hadjichambi & Anastasia Adamou & Yiannis Georgiou, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review on the Participation Aspects of Environmental and Nature-Based Citizen Science Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, July.
    13. Rebecca A. Senior & Ruby Bagwyn & Danyan Leng & Alexander K. Killion & Walter Jetz & David S. Wilcove, 2024. "Global shortfalls in documented actions to conserve biodiversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 630(8016), pages 387-391, June.
    14. Miguel Ángel Queiruga-Dios & Emilia López-Iñesta & María Diez-Ojeda & María Consuelo Sáiz-Manzanares & José Benito Vázquez Dorrío, 2020. "Citizen Science for Scientific Literacy and the Attainment of Sustainable Development Goals in Formal Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Fábio Grigoletto & Fernanda Antunes de Oliveira & Caio Caradi Momesso & Ibrahim Kamel Rodrigues Nehemy & João Emílio de Almeida Junior & Vinícius de Avelar São Pedro & Roberto Greco & Mário Aquino Alv, 2023. "Technological Affordance and the Realities of Citizen Science Projects Developed in Challenging Territories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michalis A. Vasiliades & Andreas Ch. Hadjichambis & Demetra Paraskeva-Hadjichambi & Anastasia Adamou & Yiannis Georgiou, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review on the Participation Aspects of Environmental and Nature-Based Citizen Science Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Anastasia Adamou & Yiannis Georgiou & Demetra Paraskeva-Hadjichambi & Andreas Ch. Hadjichambis, 2021. "Environmental Citizen Science Initiatives as a Springboard towards the Education for Environmental Citizenship: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara & Maria-Victoria Sánchez-Rebull & Angels Niñerola, 2021. "Six Sigma in Health Literature, What Matters?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Ruth Zárate-Rueda & Yolima Ivonne Beltrán-Villamizar & Daniella Murallas-Sánchez, 2021. "Social representations of socioenvironmental dynamics in extractive ecosystems and conservation practices with sustainable development: a bibliometric analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16428-16453, November.
    5. Bhaskar Mukherjee & Siniša Subotić & Ajay Kumar Chaubey, 2018. "And now for something completely different: the congruence of the Altmetric Attention Score’s structure between different article groups," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 253-275, January.
    6. Laengle, Sigifredo & Merigó, José M. & Miranda, Jaime & Słowiński, Roman & Bomze, Immanuel & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Dyson, Robert G. & Oliveira, José Fernando & Teunter, Ruud, 2017. "Forty years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A bibliometric overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 803-816.
    7. Christopher Tirri & Hunter Swanson & Mahbubur Meenar, 2021. "Finding the “Heart” in the Green: Conducting a Bibliometric Analysis to Emphasize the Need for Connecting Emotions with Biophilic Urban Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Mingchun Cao & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, August.
    9. Andreas Ch. Hadjichambis & Demetra Paraskeva-Hadjichambi & Eleni Sinakou & Anastasia Adamou & Yiannis Georgiou, 2022. "Green Cities for Environmental Citizenship: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research from 31 Green Cities of the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-30, December.
    10. Crismeire Isbaex & Francisco dos Reis Fernandes Costa & Teresa Batista, 2025. "Application of GIS in the Maritime-Port Sector: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-36, April.
    11. Waltman, Ludo, 2016. "A review of the literature on citation impact indicators," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 365-391.
    12. Qian Wang & Shixian Luo & Jiao Zhang & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Increased Attention to Smart Development in Rural Areas: A Scientometric Analysis of Smart Village Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    13. António Correia & Hugo Paredes & Benjamim Fonseca, 2018. "Scientometric analysis of scientific publications in CSCW," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 31-89, January.
    14. Adnan Ali & Suresh Ramakrishnan & Faisal Faisal & Tooba Akram & Sidra Salam & Sami Ur Rahman, 2023. "Bibliometric analysis of finance and natural resources: past trend, current development, and future prospects," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 13035-13064, November.
    15. Raminta Pranckutė, 2021. "Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59, March.
    16. Akbar Hossain Kanan & Carlo Giupponi, 2024. "Coastal Socio-Ecological Systems Adapting to Climate Change: A Global Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-23, November.
    17. Robert Lepenies & Ibrahim Sidi Zakari, 2021. "Citizen Science for Transformative Air Quality Policy in Germany and Niger," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Danielle Lee, 2023. "Bibliometric analysis of Asian ‘language and linguistics’ research: A case of 13 countries," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Benjamin Tawiah & Emmanuel A. Ofori & Fei Bin, 2023. "Scientometric Review of Sustainable Fire-Resistant Polysaccharide-Based Composite Aerogels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-34, August.
    20. Heather Keathley-Herring & Eileen Van Aken & Fernando Gonzalez-Aleu & Fernando Deschamps & Geert Letens & Pablo Cardenas Orlandini, 2016. "Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 927-951, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4972-:d:1666804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.