IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4815-d1662979.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chitosan-Modified Biochar for Improving Water Retention in Karst Quarries: A Potential Solution for Soil Remediation

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohua Shu

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Water Pollution Control and Water Safety in Karst Area, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)

  • Shiqing Xiong

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Water Pollution Control and Water Safety in Karst Area, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)

  • Qiulei Wang

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Water Pollution Control and Water Safety in Karst Area, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)

  • Mingyu Yang

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Water Pollution Control and Water Safety in Karst Area, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)

  • Qian Zhang

    (School of Life and Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541000, China)

Abstract

Biochar has been widely applied in soil remediation. However, few studies have been conducted on its effect on soil water retention in abandoned quarries. Moreover, due to the poor water storage capacity of the quarry, the adhesion and water retention capacity of biochar are limited in its application. Here, we used sugarcane bagasse (SB) and chicken manure (CM) prepared at 300 °C and 500 °C, and modified them with chitosan (CS) to improve the water absorption, and further explored their effects on the soil water retention characteristics in karst, abandoned quarry. The results indicated that the modified biochar significantly improves the hydrophilicity and water absorption capacity of the biochar. The water absorption multiples of 300SBB-CS, 500SBB-CS, 300CMB-CS, and 500CMB-CS were 131.03, 94.47, 86.19, and 114.70 g·g −1 . After being applied to the quarry soil, it significantly improved the water retention characteristics. In addition, the application of modified biochar significantly increased the mean weight diameter (MWD), geometric mean diameter (GMD), and cation exchange capacity (CEC) of soil aggregates. Compared with the control, GMD of 300SBB-CS, 500SBB-CS, 300CMB-CS, and 500CMB-CS increased by 24.42%, 32.74%, 8.34%, and 21.20%, respectively. The modified biochar improves the soil’s water retention characteristics by enhancing its water absorption capacity. In addition, the modified biochar improves the stability of soil aggregates by increasing the soil CEC, which indirectly enhances the water retention characteristics of the soil. These findings provide substantial reference information for improving soil conditions in karst regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohua Shu & Shiqing Xiong & Qiulei Wang & Mingyu Yang & Qian Zhang, 2025. "Chitosan-Modified Biochar for Improving Water Retention in Karst Quarries: A Potential Solution for Soil Remediation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4815-:d:1662979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4815/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4815/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrenelli, M.C. & Maienza, A. & Genesio, L. & Miglietta, F. & Pellegrini, S. & Vaccari, F.P. & Vignozzi, N., 2016. "Field application of pelletized biochar: Short term effect on the hydrological properties of a silty clay loam soil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 190-196.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Anita Maienza & Lorenzo Genesio & Marco Acciai & Franco Miglietta & Emanuela Pusceddu & Francesco Primo Vaccari, 2017. "Impact of Biochar Formulation on the Release of Particulate Matter and on Short-Term Agronomic Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Seyede Roghie Ghadirnezhad Shiade & Amin Fathi & Tatiana Minkina & Ming Hung Wong & Vishnu D. Rajput, 2024. "Biochar application in agroecosystems: a review of potential benefits and limitations," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 19231-19255, August.
    4. Li, Yi & Yao, Ning & Liang, Jiaping & Wang, Xiaofang & Niu, Ben & Jia, Yonglin & Jiang, Fuchang & Yu, Qiang & Liu, De Li & Feng, Hao & He, Hailong & Yang, Guang & Pulatov, Alim, 2023. "Rational biochar application rate for cotton nutrient content, growth, yields, productivity, and economic benefits under film-mulched trickle irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    5. Yanan Xiao & Shihong Yang & Junzeng Xu & Jie Ding & Xiao Sun & Zewei Jiang, 2018. "Effect of Biochar Amendment on Methane Emissions from Paddy Field under Water-Saving Irrigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Günal, Elif & Erdem, Halil & Çelik, İsmail, 2018. "Effects of three different biochars amendment on water retention of silty loam and loamy soils," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 232-244.
    7. Hana Hlaváčiková & Viliam Novák & Koji Kameyama & Katarína Brezianska & Marek Rodný & Justína Vitková, 2019. "Two types of biochars: one made from sugarcane bagasse, other one produced from paper fiber sludge and grain husks and their effects on water retention of a clay, a loamy soil and a silica sand," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 14(2), pages 67-75.
    8. Polina Kuryntseva & Kamalya Karamova & Polina Galitskaya & Svetlana Selivanovskaya & Gennady Evtugyn, 2023. "Biochar Functions in Soil Depending on Feedstock and Pyrolyzation Properties with Particular Emphasis on Biological Properties," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-39, October.
    9. Zetao Zhu & Yuan Zhang & Wenmei Tao & Xiaoli Zhang & Zhongda Xu & Chengcheng Xu, 2025. "The Biological Effects of Biochar on Soil’s Physical and Chemical Characteristics: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-26, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4815-:d:1662979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.