IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3828-d1387822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Seismic Landslide Susceptibility Analysis for Sustainable Disaster Risk Management through Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Hailang He

    (School of Safety Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Hefei Institute for Public Safety Research, Tsinghua University, Hefei 230601, China
    Defense Engineering Institute, AMS, PLA, Beijing 100036, China)

  • Weiwei Wang

    (Hefei Institute for Public Safety Research, Tsinghua University, Hefei 230601, China
    Primus Line (China) Ltd., Shanghai 201108, China)

  • Zhengxing Wang

    (Hefei Institute for Public Safety Research, Tsinghua University, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Shu Li

    (Hefei Institute for Public Safety Research, Tsinghua University, Hefei 230601, China
    Anhui Key Laboratory of Bridge and Tunnel Engineering Testing, Hefei 230051, China)

  • Jianguo Chen

    (School of Safety Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

The accuracy of Seismic Landslide Susceptibility Maps (SLSMs) is imperative for the prevention of seismic landslide disasters. This study enhances the precision of SLSMs by integrating nine distinct machine learning methodologies with the GeoDetector version 0.0.4 tool to filter both numerical and physical factors contributing to landslide susceptibility. The dataset comprises 2317 landslide instances triggered by the 2013 Minxian Ms = 6.6 earthquake, from which redundant factors were pruned using the Recursive Feature Elimination technique. Subsequent evaluations of the optimized factors, both individually and in combination, were conducted through Frequency Ratio analysis and Factor Interaction assessment. The study juxtaposes the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) and the accuracy of nine machine learning models before and after factor optimization. The findings indicate an increase in AUC from a maximum of 0.989 to 0.992 in the Random Forest model, and an 8.37% increase in AUC for the SVM model, signifying a notable enhancement in the stability across all models. The establishment of the SLSM notably elevated the frequency ratio in high-risk zones from 50.40 to 85.14, underscoring the efficacy of combining machine learning and detector optimization techniques in sustainable practices. This research proposes a universal framework aimed at eliminating redundancy and noise in SLSMs and hazard risk assessments, thereby facilitating sustainable geological disaster risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Hailang He & Weiwei Wang & Zhengxing Wang & Shu Li & Jianguo Chen, 2024. "Enhancing Seismic Landslide Susceptibility Analysis for Sustainable Disaster Risk Management through Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3828-:d:1387822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3828/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3828/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krishna Devkota & Amar Regmi & Hamid Pourghasemi & Kohki Yoshida & Biswajeet Pradhan & In Ryu & Megh Dhital & Omar Althuwaynee, 2013. "Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling–Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(1), pages 135-165, January.
    2. Žiga Malek & Veronica Zumpano & Haydar Hussin, 2018. "Forest management and future changes to ecosystem services in the Romanian Carpathians," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1275-1291, June.
    3. Bankim Mahanta & H. O. Singh & P. K. Singh & Ashutosh Kainthola & T. N. Singh, 2016. "Stability analysis of potential failure zones along NH-305, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(3), pages 1341-1357, September.
    4. Jun Zhang & Xiaodie Yuan, 2021. "COVID-19 Risk Assessment: Contributing to Maintaining Urban Public Health Security and Achieving Sustainable Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eseosa Halima Ighile & Hiroaki Shirakawa & Hiroki Tanikawa, 2022. "Application of GIS and Machine Learning to Predict Flood Areas in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-33, April.
    2. R. O. E. Ulakpa & V.U.D. Okwu & K. E. Chukwu & M. O. Eyankware, 2020. "Landslide Susceptibility Modelling In Selected States Across Se. Nigeria," Environment & Ecosystem Science (EES), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 23-27, March.
    3. Xinfu Xing & Chenglong Wu & Jinhui Li & Xueyou Li & Limin Zhang & Rongjie He, 2021. "Susceptibility assessment for rainfall-induced landslides using a revised logistic regression method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 97-117, March.
    4. Aleksandra Kosanic & Karsten Lambers & Stamatia Galata & Katja Kothieringer & Angelika Abderhalden, 2023. "Importance of Cultural Ecosystem Services for Cultural Identity and Wellbeing in the Lower Engadine, Switzerland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Kourosh Shirani & Mehrdad Pasandi & Alireza Arabameri, 2018. "Landslide susceptibility assessment by Dempster–Shafer and Index of Entropy models, Sarkhoun basin, Southwestern Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1379-1418, September.
    6. Sina Paryani & Aminreza Neshat & Saman Javadi & Biswajeet Pradhan, 2020. "Comparative performance of new hybrid ANFIS models in landslide susceptibility mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(2), pages 1961-1988, September.
    7. Tahir Ali Akbar & Siddique Ullah & Waheed Ullah & Rafi Ullah & Raja Umer Sajjad & Abdullah Mohamed & Alamgir Khalil & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Anwarud Din, 2022. "Development and Application of Models for Landslide Hazards in Northern Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Bayes Ahmed, 2015. "Landslide susceptibility modelling applying user-defined weighting and data-driven statistical techniques in Cox’s Bazar Municipality, Bangladesh," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1707-1737, December.
    9. Sandeep Kumar & Vikram Gupta, 2021. "Evaluation of spatial probability of landslides using bivariate and multivariate approaches in the Goriganga valley, Kumaun Himalaya, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2461-2488, December.
    10. Di Wang & Mengmeng Hao & Shuai Chen & Ze Meng & Dong Jiang & Fangyu Ding, 2021. "Assessment of landslide susceptibility and risk factors in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(3), pages 3045-3059, September.
    11. Jean Baptiste Nsengiyumva & Geping Luo & Egide Hakorimana & Richard Mind'je & Aboubakar Gasirabo & Valentine Mukanyandwi, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of Deterministic and Semiquantitative Approaches for Shallow Landslide Risk Modeling in Rwanda," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(11), pages 2576-2595, November.
    12. Yigen Qin & Genlan Yang & Kunpeng Lu & Qianzheng Sun & Jin Xie & Yunwu Wu, 2021. "Performance Evaluation of Five GIS-Based Models for Landslide Susceptibility Prediction and Mapping: A Case Study of Kaiyang County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Idris Bello Yamusa & Mohd Suhaili Ismail & Abdulwaheed Tella, 2022. "Highway Proneness Appraisal to Landslides along Taiping to Ipoh Segment Malaysia, Using MCDM and GIS Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Gökhan Demir, 2018. "Landslide susceptibility mapping by using statistical analysis in the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) on the northern part of Suşehri Town, Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(1), pages 133-154, May.
    15. Javeria Saleem & Sheikh Saeed Ahmad & Amna Butt, 2020. "Hazard risk assessment of landslide-prone sub-Himalayan region by employing geospatial modeling approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(3), pages 1497-1514, July.
    16. Prafull Singh & Ankit Sharma & Ujjwal Sur & Praveen Kumar Rai, 2021. "Comparative landslide susceptibility assessment using statistical information value and index of entropy model in Bhanupali-Beri region, Himachal Pradesh, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 5233-5250, April.
    17. Yimin Li & Xuanlun Deng & Peikun Ji & Yiming Yang & Wenxue Jiang & Zhifang Zhao, 2022. "Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility Based on CF-SVM in Nujiang Prefecture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-24, October.
    18. Seyed Vahid Razavi-Termeh & Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki & Farbod Farhangi & Soo-Mi Choi, 2021. "COVID-19 Risk Mapping with Considering Socio-Economic Criteria Using Machine Learning Algorithms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Kamila Hodasová & Martin Bednarik, 2021. "Effect of using various weighting methods in a process of landslide susceptibility assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 481-499, January.
    20. Cheng Su & Lili Wang & Xizhi Wang & Zhicai Huang & Xiaocan Zhang, 2015. "Mapping of rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in Wencheng, China, using support vector machine," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(3), pages 1759-1779, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3828-:d:1387822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.