IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6719-d574548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Models for Predicting Groundwater Quality in a River Basin of South India

Author

Listed:
  • M. Annie Jenifer

    (VIT School of Agricultural Innovations and Advanced Learning (VAIAL), Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, India)

  • Madan Kumar Jha

    (AgFE Department, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Kharagpur 721302, India)

  • Amina Khatun

    (AgFE Department, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Kharagpur 721302, India)

Abstract

India is the largest consumer of groundwater in the world, and it suffers from a groundwater crisis due to the overexploitation of groundwater and the deterioration of its quality at an alarming rate. Rapid urbanization, a growing population, and mismanagement are major driving forces behind these groundwater issues. Thus, increasing problems of water scarcity and water-quality deterioration threaten the sustainability of the water supply. This necessitates the development of novel approaches to assess prevailing groundwater quality scenarios at a large scale, which can help protect this vital freshwater resource from contamination. In this study, for the first time, the effectiveness of three Geographical Information System (GIS)-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) models (i.e., ‘Unit Weight’, ‘Rank Sum’, and ‘Analytic Hierarchy Process’) was explored for predicting groundwater quality in a river basin of Southern India. The seasonal concentrations of groundwater quality parameters, viz., Cl − , TDS, TH, F − , NO 3 − -N, Na + , Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ , K + , and SO 4 2− , were considered for generating their thematic layers. Each thematic layer was classified into suitable feature classes based on the WHO guidelines for drinking water. The thematic layers and the feature classes of individual groundwater quality parameters were assigned relative weights according to the theories of the three MCDA models mentioned above. These thematic layers were then aggregated in GIS to develop Groundwater Quality Index (GQI) maps of the study area for pre-monsoon and post-monsoon seasons. Furthermore, the accuracy of the developed GQI maps was validated using relative operating characteristic curves. The results of the validation indicated that the GIS-based Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model outperformed with prediction accuracies of 71.4% in the pre-monsoon season and about 85% in the post-monsoon season. However, the performances of the Unit Weight and Rank Sum models were found to be average with prediction accuracies varying from 68% to 63% and 64% to 68%, respectively. Thus, the GIS-based AHP model can serve as a reliable scientific tool for predicting seasonal groundwater quality at a river basin scale. It can be very helpful to the policymakers for devising viable management strategies for groundwater protection as well as for ensuring a sustainable water supply.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Annie Jenifer & Madan Kumar Jha & Amina Khatun, 2021. "Assessing Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Models for Predicting Groundwater Quality in a River Basin of South India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-29, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6719-:d:574548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6719/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6719/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Causape, J. & Quilez, D. & Aragues, R., 2006. "Groundwater quality in CR-V irrigation district (Bardenas I, Spain): Alternative scenarios to reduce off-site salt and nitrate contamination," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 281-289, August.
    2. Krishna Devkota & Amar Regmi & Hamid Pourghasemi & Kohki Yoshida & Biswajeet Pradhan & In Ryu & Megh Dhital & Omar Althuwaynee, 2013. "Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling–Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(1), pages 135-165, January.
    3. Insaf Babiker & Mohamed Mohamed & Tetsuya Hiyama, 2007. "Assessing groundwater quality using GIS," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(4), pages 699-715, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chao Liu & Mingshuang Xu & Yufeng Liu & Xuefei Li & Zonglin Pang & Sheng Miao, 2022. "Predicting Groundwater Indicator Concentration Based on Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinfu Xing & Chenglong Wu & Jinhui Li & Xueyou Li & Limin Zhang & Rongjie He, 2021. "Susceptibility assessment for rainfall-induced landslides using a revised logistic regression method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 97-117, March.
    2. Kourosh Shirani & Mehrdad Pasandi & Alireza Arabameri, 2018. "Landslide susceptibility assessment by Dempster–Shafer and Index of Entropy models, Sarkhoun basin, Southwestern Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1379-1418, September.
    3. B. Yan & X. Su & Y. Chen, 2009. "Functional Structure and Data Management of Urban Water Supply Network Based on GIS," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(13), pages 2633-2653, October.
    4. Sandeep Kumar & Vikram Gupta, 2021. "Evaluation of spatial probability of landslides using bivariate and multivariate approaches in the Goriganga valley, Kumaun Himalaya, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2461-2488, December.
    5. Hailang He & Weiwei Wang & Zhengxing Wang & Shu Li & Jianguo Chen, 2024. "Enhancing Seismic Landslide Susceptibility Analysis for Sustainable Disaster Risk Management through Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Di Wang & Mengmeng Hao & Shuai Chen & Ze Meng & Dong Jiang & Fangyu Ding, 2021. "Assessment of landslide susceptibility and risk factors in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(3), pages 3045-3059, September.
    7. Suvam Das & Shantanu Sarkar & Debi Prasanna Kanungo, 2025. "An ensemble approach of bi-variate statistical models with soft-computing techniques for GIS-based landslide susceptibility zonation in the Kalimpong region of Darjeeling Himalaya, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 16841-16882, July.
    8. Idris Bello Yamusa & Mohd Suhaili Ismail & Abdulwaheed Tella, 2022. "Highway Proneness Appraisal to Landslides along Taiping to Ipoh Segment Malaysia, Using MCDM and GIS Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Saidi, Salwa & Bouri, Salem & Ben Dhia, Hamed & Anselme, Brice, 2009. "A GIS-based susceptibility indexing method for irrigation and drinking water management planning: Application to Chebba-Mellouleche Aquifer, Tunisia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1683-1690, December.
    10. Gökhan Demir, 2018. "Landslide susceptibility mapping by using statistical analysis in the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) on the northern part of Suşehri Town, Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(1), pages 133-154, May.
    11. Javeria Saleem & Sheikh Saeed Ahmad & Amna Butt, 2020. "Hazard risk assessment of landslide-prone sub-Himalayan region by employing geospatial modeling approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(3), pages 1497-1514, July.
    12. Yimin Li & Xuanlun Deng & Peikun Ji & Yiming Yang & Wenxue Jiang & Zhifang Zhao, 2022. "Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility Based on CF-SVM in Nujiang Prefecture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Rajendra B. Zolekar & Rahul S. Todmal & Vijay S. Bhagat & Santosh A. Bhailume & Mahendra S. Korade & Sumit Das, 2021. "Hydro-chemical characterization and geospatial analysis of groundwater for drinking and agricultural usage in Nashik district in Maharashtra, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4433-4452, March.
    14. Seyed Vahid Razavi-Termeh & Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki & Farbod Farhangi & Soo-Mi Choi, 2021. "COVID-19 Risk Mapping with Considering Socio-Economic Criteria Using Machine Learning Algorithms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Kamila Hodasová & Martin Bednarik, 2021. "Effect of using various weighting methods in a process of landslide susceptibility assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 481-499, January.
    16. Chuhan Wang & Qigen Lin & Leibin Wang & Tong Jiang & Buda Su & Yanjun Wang & Sanjit Kumar Mondal & Jinlong Huang & Ying Wang, 2022. "The influences of the spatial extent selection for non-landslide samples on statistical-based landslide susceptibility modelling: a case study of Anhui Province in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(3), pages 1967-1988, July.
    17. Shaohan Zhang & Shucheng Tan & Hui Geng & Ronwei Li & Yongqi Sun & Jun Li, 2023. "Evaluation of Geological Hazard Risk in Yiliang County, Yunnan Province, Using Combined Assignment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Abdessamed Derdour & Hazem Ghassan Abdo & Hussein Almohamad & Abdullah Alodah & Ahmed Abdullah Al Dughairi & Sherif S. M. Ghoneim & Enas Ali, 2023. "Prediction of Groundwater Quality Index Using Classification Techniques in Arid Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    19. A. El-Hames & A. Hannachi & M. Al-Ahmadi & N. Al-Amri, 2013. "Groundwater Quality Zonation Assessment using GIS, EOFs and Hierarchical Clustering," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(7), pages 2465-2481, May.
    20. Haoyuan Hong & Himan Shahabi & Ataollah Shirzadi & Wei Chen & Kamran Chapi & Baharin Bin Ahmad & Majid Shadman Roodposhti & Arastoo Yari Hesar & Yingying Tian & Dieu Tien Bui, 2019. "Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning area, China: a comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(1), pages 173-212, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6719-:d:574548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.