IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2233-d1352783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential Environmental Impacts of a Hospital Wastewater Treatment Plant in a Developing Country

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Tariq Khan

    (Department of Science and Environmental Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
    State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Riaz Ahmad

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Gengyuan Liu

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Lixiao Zhang

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Remo Santagata

    (Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Pegaso University, Centro Direzionale, Isola F2, 80143 Napoli, Italy)

  • Massimiliano Lega

    (Department of Engineering, University of Napoli ‘Parthenope’, Centro Direzionale, Isola C4, 80143 Napoli, Italy)

  • Marco Casazza

    (Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry ‘Scuola Medica Salernitana’, Università degli Studi di Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy)

Abstract

Assessing the quality of a hospital wastewater treatment process and plant is essential, especially if the presence of chemical and biological toxic compounds is considered. There is less literature on hospital wastewater treatment in developing countries because of a lack of managerial awareness and stakeholder cooperation, accompanied by the limited capacity of investment meant to upgrade the existing infrastructures. Limited access to data further hampers the reliable analysis of hospital wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in developing countries. Thus, based on the possibility of collecting a sufficient amount of primary (i.e., field) data, this study performed an assessment of the potential impacts generated by the WWTP of Quaid-Azam International Hospital in Islamabad (Pakistan) considering its construction and operational phases. The major identified impacts were attributed to the energy mix used to operate the plant. Marine ecotoxicity was the most impactful category (34% of the total potential impacts accounted for), followed by human carcinogenic toxicity (31%), freshwater toxicity (18%), terrestrial ecotoxicity (7%), and human non-carcinogenic toxicity (4%). An analysis of potential impacts was combined with an assessment of potential damage according to an endpoint approach. In particular, the endpoint analysis results indicated that human health damage (quantified as DALY) was mainly dependent on the “fine PM (particulate matter) formation” category (51%), followed by “global warming and human health” (43%). Other categories related to human health impacts were human carcinogenic toxicity (3%), water consumption (2%), and human non-carcinogenic toxicity (1%). The other impact categories recorded a percentage contribution lower than 1%. With respect to ecosystem damage, “global warming and terrestrial ecosystems” played a major role (61%), followed by terrestrial acidification (24%), ozone formation (10%), water consumption (5%), and freshwater eutrophication (1%). This study’s findings support an increase in awareness in the hospital management board while pointing out the need to further implement similar studies to improve the quality of decision-making processes and to mitigate environmental impacts in more vulnerable regions. Finally, this research evidenced the need to overcome the existing general constraints on data availability. Consequently, further field work, supported by hospital managers in developing countries, would help in enhancing managerial procedures; optimizing treatment plant efficiency; and facilitating the implementation of circular options, such as sludge management, that often remain unexplored.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Tariq Khan & Riaz Ahmad & Gengyuan Liu & Lixiao Zhang & Remo Santagata & Massimiliano Lega & Marco Casazza, 2024. "Potential Environmental Impacts of a Hospital Wastewater Treatment Plant in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2233-:d:1352783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gu, Yifan & Li, Yue & Li, Xuyao & Luo, Pengzhou & Wang, Hongtao & Robinson, Zoe P. & Wang, Xin & Wu, Jiang & Li, Fengting, 2017. "The feasibility and challenges of energy self-sufficient wastewater treatment plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1463-1475.
    2. ZhenHua Li & ZhiHong Zou & LiPing Wang, 2019. "Analysis and Forecasting of the Energy Consumption in Wastewater Treatment Plant," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-8, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jose M. Vindel & Estrella Trincado & Antonio Sánchez-Bayón, 2021. "European Union Green Deal and the Opportunity Cost of Wastewater Treatment Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Moazeni, Faegheh & Khazaei, Javad, 2021. "Co-optimization of wastewater treatment plants interconnected with smart grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    3. Mónica Vergara-Araya & Verena Hilgenfeldt & Di Peng & Heidrun Steinmetz & Jürgen Wiese, 2021. "Modelling to Lower Energy Consumption in a Large WWTP in China While Optimising Nitrogen Removal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Adam Masłoń & Joanna Czarnota & Paulina Szczyrba & Aleksandra Szaja & Joanna Szulżyk-Cieplak & Grzegorz Łagód, 2024. "Assessment of Energy Self-Sufficiency of Wastewater Treatment Plants—A Case Study from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Min-Hwi Kim & Deuk-Won Kim & Gwangwoo Han & Jaehyeok Heo & Dong-Won Lee, 2021. "Ground Source and Sewage Water Source Heat Pump Systems for Block Heating and Cooling Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Mehdi Sharif Shourjeh & Przemysław Kowal & Jakub Drewnowski & Bartosz Szeląg & Aleksandra Szaja & Grzegorz Łagód, 2020. "Mutual Interaction between Temperature and DO Set Point on AOB and NOB Activity during Shortcut Nitrification in a Sequencing Batch Reactor in Terms of Energy Consumption Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Rosa M. Llácer-Iglesias & P. Amparo López-Jiménez & Modesto Pérez-Sánchez, 2021. "Energy Self-Sufficiency Aiming for Sustainable Wastewater Systems: Are All Options Being Explored?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Rosa, A.P. & Chernicharo, C.A.L. & Lobato, L.C.S. & Silva, R.V. & Padilha, R.F. & Borges, J.M., 2018. "Assessing the potential of renewable energy sources (biogas and sludge) in a full-scale UASB-based treatment plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 21-26.
    9. Macintosh, C. & Astals, S. & Sembera, C. & Ertl, A. & Drewes, J.E. & Jensen, P.D. & Koch, K., 2019. "Successful strategies for increasing energy self-sufficiency at Grüneck wastewater treatment plant in Germany by food waste co-digestion and improved aeration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 797-808.
    10. Xu, Jiuping & Zhao, Chuandang & Wang, Fengjuan & Yang, Guocan, 2022. "Industrial decarbonisation oriented distributed renewable generation towards wastewater treatment sector: Case from the Yangtze River Delta region in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    11. Guven, Huseyin & Ersahin, Mustafa Evren & Dereli, Recep Kaan & Ozgun, Hale & Isik, Isa & Ozturk, Izzet, 2019. "Energy recovery potential of anaerobic digestion of excess sludge from high-rate activated sludge systems co-treating municipal wastewater and food waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1027-1036.
    12. Wang, Chin-Tsan & Lee, Yao-Cheng & Ou, Yun-Ting & Yang, Yung-Chin & Chong, Wen-Tong & Sangeetha, Thangavel & Yan, Wei-Mon, 2017. "Exposing effect of comb-type cathode electrode on the performance of sediment microbial fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 620-625.
    13. Clara Yuqi Liao & Ysabel Jingyi Guan & Mauricio Bustamante-Román, 2022. "Techno-Economic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of Pineapple Leaves Utilization in Costa Rica," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
    14. Michela Gallo & Desara Malluta & Adriana Del Borghi & Erica Gagliano, 2024. "A Critical Review on Methodologies for the Energy Benchmarking of Wastewater Treatment Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Yu, Lu & Yuan, Haiping & Zhu, Nanwen & Shen, Yanwen, 2021. "How does choline change methanogenesis pathway in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    16. Strazzabosco, A. & Kenway, S.J. & Conrad, S.A. & Lant, P.A., 2021. "Renewable electricity generation in the Australian water industry: Lessons learned and challenges for the future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    17. Yin, Changkai & Shen, Yanwen & Zhu, Nanwen & Huang, Qiujie & Lou, Ziyang & Yuan, Haiping, 2018. "Anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge with incineration bottom ash: Enhanced methane production and CO2 sequestration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 503-511.
    18. Maria Rosa di Cicco & Antonio Masiello & Antonio Spagnuolo & Carmela Vetromile & Laura Borea & Giuseppe Giannella & Manuela Iovinella & Carmine Lubritto, 2021. "Real-Time Monitoring and Static Data Analysis to Assess Energetic and Environmental Performances in the Wastewater Sector: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Bey, M. & Hamidat, A. & Nacer, T., 2021. "Eco-energetic feasibility study of using grid-connected photovoltaic system in wastewater treatment plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    20. Kirilova, Elisaveta G. & Vladova, Rayka K. & Vaklieva-Bancheva, Natasha Gr, 2020. "Heat integration of two-stage autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion system for reducing the impact of uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2233-:d:1352783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.