IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9408-d1509663.html

Phytoremediation of Mercury Contamination: Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lina Mosquera Chaverra

    (Faculty of Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Universidad Tecnológica del Chocó, Quibdó 270002, Chocó, Colombia)

  • Diego Paredes Cuervo

    (Faculty of Basic Environmental Sciences, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira 660003, Risaralda, Colombia)

  • Ana López Gutiérrez

    (Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Agroindustry, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira 660003, Risaralda, Colombia)

  • Carlos A. Arias

    (Department of Biology-Aquatic Biology, Aarhus University, Ole Worms Allé 1, Building 1135, 8000 Århus, Denmark
    WATEC—Centre for Water Technology, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark)

  • Pedro N. Carvalho

    (WATEC—Centre for Water Technology, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
    Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark)

Abstract

Mercury is classified as one of the world’s most toxic and dangerous pollutants as it tends to bioaccumulate and biomagnify within the trophic chain and is persistent. Various approaches are available to remediate Hg-affected sites including phytoremediation, which includes the use of plants to clean up contaminated environments. The phytoremediation of mercury contamination is attracting increasing attention because of its advantages: it is environmentally friendly, inexpensive, simple, and can improve soil fertility. In this report, VOSviewer (version 1.6.1) and Bibliometrix (version 4.16) software were used to analyze 457 and 697 documents published from 2000 to 2023, retrieved from the databases WoS and Scopus, respectively. China, India, the United States, and Spain were the top four most productive countries. The largest topic area was environmental sciences, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences was the organization that contributed the most to the overall number of publications. The keywords with the highest frequency excluding phytoremediation and mercury in WoS were heavy metals, accumulation, cadmium, soils, and phytoextraction. In Scopus, the most frequent keywords were bioremediation, heavy metals, soil pollution, bioaccumulation, biodegradation, and environmental. From the above analysis, we concluded that future research should focus on (1) finding native plants, (2) genetic engineering applications, (3) increasing remediation ability through assisted phytoremediation, and (4) the detoxification mechanism of mercury. This study provides insights into trending themes and serves as a reference for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Lina Mosquera Chaverra & Diego Paredes Cuervo & Ana López Gutiérrez & Carlos A. Arias & Pedro N. Carvalho, 2024. "Phytoremediation of Mercury Contamination: Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-28, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9408-:d:1509663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9408/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9408/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vivek Kumar Singh & Prashasti Singh & Mousumi Karmakar & Jacqueline Leta & Philipp Mayr, 2021. "The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5113-5142, June.
    2. Xiuhua Li & Xiaomi Wang & Ling Zhao & Zuopeng Wang & Ying Teng & Yongming Luo, 2023. "Mercury Enrichment Characteristics and Rhizosphere Bacterial Community of Ramie ( Boehmeria Nivea L. Gaud .) in Mercury-Contaminated Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Philippe Mongeon & Adèle Paul-Hus, 2016. "The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 213-228, January.
    4. Wen-Ta Chiu & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2007. "Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 73(1), pages 3-17, October.
    5. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    6. Hsin-Ning Su & Pei-Chun Lee, 2010. "Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(1), pages 65-79, October.
    7. William W. Hood & Concepción S. Wilson, 2001. "The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(2), pages 291-314, October.
    8. Omena Bernard Ojuederie & Olubukola Oluranti Babalola, 2017. "Microbial and Plant-Assisted Bioremediation of Heavy Metal Polluted Environments: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Dongping Shi & Chengyu Xie & Jinmiao Wang & Lichun Xiong, 2021. "Changes in the Structures and Directions of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soil Remediation Research from 1999 to 2020: A Bibliometric & Scientometric Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Wei & Xiaoling Huang & Shuai Zhang & Wanru Wang & Mengfei Liu, 2025. "Journal of Informetrics 2007–2023: A Retrospective Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    2. Dongping Shi & Chengyu Xie & Jinmiao Wang & Lichun Xiong, 2021. "Changes in the Structures and Directions of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soil Remediation Research from 1999 to 2020: A Bibliometric & Scientometric Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Nasrabadi, Mohamadreza Azar & Beauregard, Yvan & Ekhlassi, Amir, 2024. "The implication of user-generated content in new product development process: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    4. Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Emilio Abad-Segura, 2021. "Sustainable Business Model in the Product-Service System: Analysis of Global Research and Associated EU Legislation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-33, September.
    5. Dušan Nikolić & Dragan Ivanović & Lidija Ivanović, 2024. "An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4573-4595, July.
    6. Kumari, Alka & Singh, Manvendra Pratap, 2023. "A journey of social sustainability in organization during MDG & SDG period: A bibliometric analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Abdelkebir Sahid & Yassine Maleh & Karim Ouazzane, 2025. "Changing landscape of fake news research on social media: a bibliometric analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 901-954, April.
    8. Yu Wang & Ali Jalalian Daghigh, 2024. "Two Decades of Audiovisual Translation Studies: A Bibliometric Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    9. Khush Dil Khan & Xuesong Guo & Tajdar Khan & Muhammad Saeed, 2025. "Risk management strategies and climate change adoption policy: a global literature review using bibliometric analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(9), pages 10601-10622, May.
    10. Wakara Ibrahimu Nyabakora, 2024. "The Contribution of Family Businessesto Economic Growth: A Bibliometric Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
    11. Tongkun Zhang & Heqing Cai & Yuan Tang & Weichang Gao & Xinqing Lee & Huan Li & Caibin Li & Jianzhong Cheng, 2025. "Visualising the trends of biochar influencing soil physicochemical properties using bibliometric analysis 2010–2022," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 2815-2839, February.
    12. Congying Fang & Riken Homma & Tianfu Qiu, 2024. "A Bibliometrics Analysis Related to the Built Environment and Walking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Güler Koştı & İsmail Kayadibi, 2025. "A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence and machine learning applications for human resource management," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Md. Nazmus Sakib & Shah Ridwan Chowdhury & Mohammad Younus & Nehad Laila Sanju & Farhana Foysal Satata & Mahafuza Islam, 2024. "How HR analytics evolved over time: a bibliometric analysis on Scopus database," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Osman Issah & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness: A Scientometric Analysis of the Existing Literature to Map the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    16. Xiangcheng Meng & Alan H. S. Chan, 2021. "Current States and Future Trends in Safety Research of Construction Personnel: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Social Network Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Li Wang & Yanhong Lv & Siyu Huang & Yu Liu & Xinrong Li, 2023. "The Evolution of Research on C&D Waste and Sustainable Development of Resources: A Bibliometric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    18. Maribel Vega-Arce & Gonzalo Salas & Gastón Núñez-Ulloa & Cristián Pinto-Cortez & Ivelisse Torres Fernandez & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2019. "Research performance and trends in child sexual abuse research: a Science Citation Index Expanded-based analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1505-1525, December.
    19. Marek Kwiek & Wojciech Roszka, 2022. "Academic vs. biological age in research on academic careers: a large-scale study with implications for scientifically developing systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3543-3575, June.
    20. Yi-Ming Guo & Zhen-Ling Huang & Ji Guo & Hua Li & Xing-Rong Guo & Mpeoane Judith Nkeli, 2019. "Bibliometric Analysis on Smart Cities Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9408-:d:1509663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.