IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9234-d1505682.html

Will Agricultural Infrastructure Construction Promote Land Transfer? Analysis of China’s High-Standard Farmland Construction Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Lili Chen

    (School of Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Jiquan Peng

    (School of Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Yufeng Chen

    (School of Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Qingyan Cao

    (School of Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)

Abstract

The construction of high-standard basic farmland is the cornerstone of high-quality agricultural development. In theory, the construction of high-standard farmland will affect changes in land management patterns but there is a limited amount of literature on the relationship between high-standard basic farmland construction and land transfer. Based on the panel data of 31 provinces in China, this study uses the continuous double difference method to analyze the impact of high-standard farmland construction policies on land transfer. The results show the following: the high-standard farmland construction policy implemented by the Chinese government can promote land transfer, which will significantly increase the proportion of land transfer area by 0.196 units. After robustness testing, it was found that this result is still reliable. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the construction of high-standard farmland has a stronger promoting effect on land transfer in major grain-producing areas, eastern and central regions, mountainous, and more economically structured planting areas. The mechanism test shows that the construction of high-standard farmland promotes land circulation through three paths: improving agricultural production conditions, improving factor utilization efficiency, and resisting disasters and increasing income. This study provides a valuable reference for improving the construction of high-standard farmland and promoting land circulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lili Chen & Jiquan Peng & Yufeng Chen & Qingyan Cao, 2024. "Will Agricultural Infrastructure Construction Promote Land Transfer? Analysis of China’s High-Standard Farmland Construction Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9234-:d:1505682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9234/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9234/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Su, Baozhong & Li, Yuheng & Li, Lequn & Wang, Yue, 2018. "How does nonfarm employment stability influence farmers' farmland transfer decisions? Implications for China’s land use policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 66-72.
    2. Christine Valente, 2011. "Household Returns to Land Transfers in South Africa: A Q-squared Analysis," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 354-376.
    3. Rogers, Sarah & Wilmsen, Brooke & Han, Xiao & Wang, Zoe Ju-Han & Duan, Yuefang & He, Jun & Li, Jie & Lin, Wanlong & Wong, Christine, 2021. "Scaling up agriculture? The dynamics of land transfer in inland China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    4. Liwei Guo & Wei Wang, 2022. "Does agricultural mechanisation promote agricultural TFPG? Evidence from spatial panel data in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(59), pages 6809-6828, December.
    5. Jinghua Sun & Peng Cheng & Zhaoxu Liu, 2023. "Social Security, Intergenerational Care, and Cultivated Land Renting Out Behavior of Elderly Farmers: Findings from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Kaili Peng & Chen Yang & Yao Chen, 2020. "Land transfer in rural China: incentives, influencing factors and income effects," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(50), pages 5477-5490, October.
    7. Xi Yu & Xiyang Yin & Yuying Liu & Dongmei Li, 2021. "Do Agricultural Machinery Services Facilitate Land Transfer? Evidence from Rice Farmers in Sichuan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Wang, Ying & Bilsborrow, Richard E. & Zhang, Qi & Li, Jiangfeng & Song, Conghe, 2019. "Effects of payment for ecosystem services and agricultural subsidy programs on rural household land use decisions in China: Synergy or trade-off?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 785-801.
    9. Mykel R. Taylor & Gary W. Brester, 2005. "Noncash Income Transfers and Agricultural Land Values," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(4), pages 526-541.
    10. Yan, Jinming & Yang, Yumeng & Xia, Fangzhou, 2021. "Subjective land ownership and the endowment effect in land markets: A case study of the farmland “three rights separation” reform in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meseret Abatechanie & Baozhong Cai & Fang Shi & Yuanji Huang, 2022. "The Environmental and Socio-Economic Effect of Farmland Management Right Transfer in China: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Weiguo Fan & Wei Yao & Kehan Chen, 2023. "Integrating Energy Systems Language and Emergy Approach to Simulate and Analyze the Energy Flow Process of Land Transfer," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Wenjing Han & Zhengfeng Zhang & Xiaoling Zhang & Li He, 2021. "Farmland Rental Participation, Agricultural Productivity, and Household Income: Evidence from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Gong, Maogang & Elahi, Ehsan, 2022. "A nexus between farmland rights, and access, demand, and amount of agricultural loan under the socialist system of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Peng Wang & Fanzhi Wang, 2022. "A study of the impact of land transfer decisions on household income in rural China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Jiafeng Gu, 2024. "Neighborhood Does Matter: Farmers’ Local Social Interactions and Land Rental Behaviors in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Jiachen Ning & Pingyu Zhang & Qifeng Yang & Zuopeng Ma, 2023. "Spatial Pattern of Farmland Transfer in Liaoning Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Tan, Jing & Cai, Dongliang & Han, Kefei & Zhou, Kui, 2022. "Understanding peasant household’s land transfer decision-making: A perspective of financial literacy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Yiping Sun & Yinying Cai & Xia Tian & Wenyu Zhong, 2025. "How Does Social Security Affect Farmers’ Contracted Land Withdrawal: Evidence from the Suburbs of Shanghai and Wuhan," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Yihu Zhou & Tingting Fang, 2023. "How Migration Behavior Affects the Contracted Land Disposal Methods of Rural Migrants in China: An Analysis Based on the Perspective of Geographical Differences," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Yuanfeng Liu & Xinyuan He, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Unraveling the Institutional Logic in China: an Examination of the Institutional Logic Behind Separation of Ownership, Contract Rights, and Operational Rights," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13509-13531, September.
    12. Ruishi Si & Yumeng Yao & Xueqian Zhang & Qian Lu & Noshaba Aziz, 2022. "Exploring the Role of Contiguous Farmland Cultivation and Adoption of No-Tillage Technology in Improving Transferees’ Income Structure: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, April.
    13. Chaozhu Li & Xiaoliang Li & Jiaxu Wang & Tianchu Feng, 2023. "Impacts of Aging Agricultural Labor Force on Land Transfer: An Empirical Analysis Based on the China Family Panel Studies," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Wang, Ying & Zhang, Qi & Bilsborrow, Richard & Tao, Shiqi & Chen, Xiaodong & Sullivan-Wiley, Kira & Huang, Qingfeng & Li, Jiangfeng & Song, Conghe, 2020. "Effects of payments for ecosystem services programs in China on rural household labor allocation and land use: Identifying complex pathways," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Qi, Yuan & Lin, Ruihan & Zhang, Jiaqing & Lu, Mengna & Zhang, Yiyue & Zhao, Haile & Chen, Xin & Li, Yaoyao & Zhu, Daolin, 2024. "Impact of farmland quality on farmland rents and its constraints: Evidence from plots in six Chinese provinces," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    16. Xiaofan Zuo & Zhisheng Hong, 2022. "The Impact of Digital Technology on Land Rent-Out Behavior: Information Sharing or Exclusion?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    17. Jianying Wang & Yumei Xu & Lilin Zou & Ying Wang, 2021. "Does Culture Affect Farmer Willingness to Transfer Rural Land? Evidence from Southern Fujian, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Zhen Liu, 2022. "Rural Population Decline, Cultivated Land Expansion, and the Role of Land Transfers in the Farming-Pastoral Ecotone: A Case Study of Taibus, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Sheng Xu & Yu Xiao & Lu Zhang & Caiyan Yang & Xichuan Liu, 2025. "Can Land Transfer-In Improve Farmers’ Farmland Quality Protection Behavior? Empirical Evidence from Micro-Survey Data in Hubei Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, April.
    20. Ziyue Zhuang & Limei Cheng, 2025. "How Do Land Transfers Affect Rural Households’ Resilience? Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9234-:d:1505682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.