IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6953-d1455789.html

Optimising Surgical Instrument Trays for Sustainability and Patient Safety by Combining Actual Instrument Usage and Expert Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Kim E. van Nieuwenhuizen

    (Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands)

  • Teun van Trier

    (Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Herman J. Friedericy

    (Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands)

  • Frank Willem Jansen

    (Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
    Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Jenny Dankelman

    (Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Anne C. van der Eijk

    (Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
    Operating Room Department and Central Sterile Supply Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Annually, over 300 million surgeries occur globally, requiring numerous surgical instruments. However, many instruments on the tray are returned to the central sterile supply department (CSSD) unused, creating an unsustainable pattern of unnecessary consumption. To address this, we developed a method for optimising surgical instrument trays (SITs) that is straightforward to implement in other hospitals. This optimisation aims to enhance patient safety and sustainability and to improve working conditions and reduce costs. We identified actual instrument usage (IU) in the operating room (OR) and obtained expert recommendations (ERs). Data from both methods were combined in a computer model (CM) to adjust the SITs. The performance of the adjusted SITs was assessed over a year. IU of three different SITs was collected during 16 procedures (mean = 28.4%, SD = 6.4%). Combining IU and ERs resulted in a 36.7% reduction in instruments and a 31.3% weight reduction. These measures contribute to reducing the carbon footprint and enhancing sustainability. During the evaluation of the new SIT contents (n = 7 procedures), mean IU increased from 28.4% (SD = 6.4%) to 46.5% (SD = 11.0%), with no missing instruments during surgery. A one-year follow-up showed no need for further alterations. Combining both methods yields better results than using them individually, efficiently reducing unnecessary items in SITs without compromising patient safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim E. van Nieuwenhuizen & Teun van Trier & Herman J. Friedericy & Frank Willem Jansen & Jenny Dankelman & Anne C. van der Eijk, 2024. "Optimising Surgical Instrument Trays for Sustainability and Patient Safety by Combining Actual Instrument Usage and Expert Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-11, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6953-:d:1455789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6953/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6953/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ehsan Ahmadi & Dale T. Masel & Ashley Y. Metcalf & Kristin Schuller, 2019. "Inventory management of surgical supplies and sterile instruments in hospitals: a literature review," Health Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 134-151, May.
    2. Ehsan Ahmadi & Dale T. Masel & Seth Hostetler, 2023. "A Data-Driven Decision-Making Model for Configuring Surgical Trays Based on the Likelihood of Instrument Usages," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-26, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yong Ma & Tao Tao & Xuying Ma & Haoxin Li & Zhitao Cheng & Maoji Kang & Yan Zhuang & Linru Zhou & Fan Li & Song Su & Jiali Wu & Yong Tang, 2026. "An integrated deep learning framework for effective management of surgical instruments tables based on videos," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Asmae El Mokrini & Tarik Aouam & Nadine Kafa, 2023. "A tailored aggregation strategy for inventory pooling in healthcare: evidence from an emerging market," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 209-226, March.
    3. Berk Görgülü & Vahid Sarhangian, 2022. "A Newsvendor Approach to Design of Surgical Preference Cards," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 213-230, September.
    4. Jacky Chan & Berk Görgülü & Vahid Sarhangian, 2024. "Inventory Management with Advance Booking Information: The Case of Surgical Supplies and Elective Surgeries," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 931-951, May.
    5. Christophe Sauvey & Wajdi Trabelsi, 2025. "Decision Support Mathematical Model for a Production Line Design in a Context of High Demand," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 66(5), pages 4081-4106, November.
    6. Benjamin V. Neve & Charles P. Schmidt, 2022. "Point-of-use hospital inventory management with inaccurate usage capture," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 126-145, March.
    7. Steffen Rickers & Florian Sahling, 2024. "Integrated procurement and reprocessing planning for reusable medical devices with a limited shelf life," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 168-187, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6953-:d:1455789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.