IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6834-d1126630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Livability in Commercial Streets via Placemaking

Author

Listed:
  • Ansam Saleh Ali

    (Department of Architecture, College of Engineering, Salahaddin University, Erbil 44002, Iraq)

  • Salahaddin Yasin Baper

    (Department of Architecture, College of Engineering, Salahaddin University, Erbil 44002, Iraq)

Abstract

Livability is one of the key characteristics that urban architects strive to achieve. It is even more important for commercial streets, where functional diversity and the constant movement of people require special consideration. In the capital city of Erbil, Iraq, commercial streets suffer from neglect. However, there is huge potential to create an attractive environment for purposes other than shopping. Some countries have developed standards for the design of commercial streets. The basic requirements are the same, but the details vary according to people’s needs. This research study aimed to identify a comprehensive framework (i.e., a checklist) for placemaking as the basis for measuring livability on a main commercial street in Erbil, Iraq. This framework was considered as a basis for assessment and design simultaneously, helping designers to achieve two main goals: to develop the existing streets and to suggest basic principles for future street design. This study adopted a practical framework, a questionnaire, a field survey, and observations as its research methods. We concluded that placemaking dimensions were essential for activating livability, and a balance between the main dimensions was found. As more strategies were applied, the street livability increased. The results varied according to the research methods, whether quantitative or qualitative. The quantitative findings resulted from the questionnaire and one section of the practical framework. Street width, in terms of quantity, had an impact on containment and safety. The same applied to the sidewalks that had to accommodate the continuous and uninterrupted movements of four or more people. The qualitative findings were from two other sections of the practical framework, in addition to the field survey and observations. It was noted that the local elements on the street were maintained, which had a significant impact on increasing the street’s livability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ansam Saleh Ali & Salahaddin Yasin Baper, 2023. "Assessment of Livability in Commercial Streets via Placemaking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-66, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6834-:d:1126630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6834/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6834/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Del Aguila & Ensiyeh Ghavampour & Brenda Vale, 2019. "Theory of Place in Public Space," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 249-259.
    2. Donald Appleyard, 1980. "Livable Streets: Protected Neighborhoods?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 451(1), pages 106-117, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bas, Javier & Al-Khasawneh, Mohammad B. & Erdoğan, Sevgi & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2023. "How the design of Complete Streets affects mode choice: Understanding the behavioral responses to the level of traffic stress," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Boeing, Geoff & Riggs, William, 2022. "Converting One-Way Streets to Two-Way Streets to Improve Transportation Network Efficiency and Reduce Vehicle Distance Traveled," SocArXiv fyhbc, Center for Open Science.
    3. Jin Rui & Frank Othengrafen, 2023. "Examining the Role of Innovative Streets in Enhancing Urban Mobility and Livability for Sustainable Urban Transition: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Vitale Brovarone, Elisabetta & Staricco, Luca & Verlinghieri, Ersilia, 2023. "Whose is this street? Actors and conflicts in the governance of pedestrianisation processes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Kębłowski, Wojciech & Dobruszkes, Frédéric & Boussauw, Kobe, 2022. "Moving past sustainable transport studies: Towards a critical perspective on urban transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 74-83.
    6. Michael W. Mehaffy & Tigran Haas & Peter Elmlund, 2019. "Public Space in the New Urban Agenda: Research into Implementation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 134-137.
    7. Can Kara & Aminreza Iranmanesh, 2022. "Modelling and Assessing Sustainable Urban Regeneration for Historic Urban Quarters via Analytical Hierarchy Process," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Robin Gutting & Maria Gerhold & Stefanie Rößler, 2021. "Spatial Accessibility in Urban Regeneration Areas: A Population-Weighted Method Assessing the Social Amenity Provision," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 189-201.
    9. Huimin Ji & Yifan Li & Juan Li & Wowo Ding, 2023. "A Novel Quantitative Approach to the Spatial Configuration of Urban Streets Based on Local Wind Environment," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, November.
    10. Mervyn Horgan & Saara Liinamaa & Amanda Dakin & Sofia Meligrana & Meng Xu, 2020. "A Shared Everyday Ethic of Public Sociability: Outdoor Public Ice Rinks as Spaces for Encounter," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 143-154.
    11. Carlos Moreno & Zaheer Allam & Didier Chabaud & Catherine Gall & Florent Pratlong, 2021. "Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities," Post-Print hal-03549665, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6834-:d:1126630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.