IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4615-d1087971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community-Centered Sustainable Ecotourism Planning in the Bossou Forest Reserve, Guinea, West Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Destina Samani

    (West Africa Regional Advisor, United States Forest Service, Accra P.O. Box 16349, Ghana)

  • Keith Bosak

    (Department of Society & Conservation, W.A. Franke College of Forestry & Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA)

  • Sarah J. Halvorson

    (Department of Society & Conservation, W.A. Franke College of Forestry & Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA)

Abstract

Forest reserves are spaces of conservation and are often spaces of ecotourism as well. Evidence suggests that local community participation in the conservation of the forest reserve space tends to break down under weak ecotourism sector management. The Bossou Forest Reserve (BFR) in Guinea, West Africa has deteriorated considerably due to the fragmentation of the reserve and the inexorable decline in Bossou chimpanzee populations since the 1970s. The situation is largely attributable to several complex and interrelated factors, including the lack of established processes to support meaningful community participation in conservation and ecotourism planning. Ecotourism planning, with the participation of local communities, is considered to strengthen the management of the BFR and conservation connectivity. This paper reports on an approach to sustainable ecotourism planning of the BFR using the Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) framework to determine the drivers of change and livelihood concerns. Fieldwork undertook in 2019 entailed concept mapping activities which were followed by a participatory geographic information system (PGIS) approach to support community-scale ecotourism planning that considers the multiple needs of stakeholders. Data analysis resulted in a community-centered situational assessment and classification of opportunities, both of which inform ecotourism planning and social-ecological resilience. The study provides baseline data for developing a robust ecotourism management plan capable of coping with the changing internal and external stressors. PGIS-based ecotourism planning can support community priorities and is potentially applicable to other West African areas with similar ecological and livelihood settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Destina Samani & Keith Bosak & Sarah J. Halvorson, 2023. "Community-Centered Sustainable Ecotourism Planning in the Bossou Forest Reserve, Guinea, West Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4615-:d:1087971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4615/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4615/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deirdre Dragovich & Sunil Bajpai, 2022. "Managing Tourism and Environment—Trail Erosion, Thresholds of Potential Concern and Limits of Acceptable Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Kvetoslava Matlovičová & Jana Kolesárová & Michaela Demková & Katarína Kostilníková & Peter Mocák & Piotr Pachura & Mark Payne, 2022. "Stimulating Poverty Alleviation by Developing Tourism in Marginalised Roma Communities: A Case Study of the Central Spiš Region (Slovakia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Gamini Herath, 2002. "Research Methodologies for Planning Ecotourism and Nature Conservation," Tourism Economics, , vol. 8(1), pages 77-101, March.
    4. Aditi Acharya & Biraj Kanti Mondal & Tuhin Bhadra & Kamal Abdelrahman & Prabuddh Kumar Mishra & Anuj Tiwari & Rima Das, 2022. "Geospatial Analysis of Geo-Ecotourism Site Suitability Using AHP and GIS for Sustainable and Resilient Tourism Planning in West Bengal, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dorothy Ruth Queiros, 2023. "Planning for Socio-Ecological Conservation in South African Nature Reserves: Model of Influences on the Attitudes of Proximate Communities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daminda Sumanapala & Isabelle D. Wolf, 2022. "Introducing Geotourism to Diversify the Visitor Experience in Protected Areas and Reduce Impacts on Overused Attractions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Ellingson, Lindsey & Seidl, Andrew, 2007. "Comparative analysis of non-market valuation techniques for the Eduardo Avaroa Reserve, Bolivia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 517-525, January.
    3. Ssu-Chi Pan & Tai-Shan Hu & Ben-Zin Chia & Su-Li Chang & Hai-Ping Lin, 2022. "Does Knowledge Evolution Matter? Reflection on Alpine Tribes Industry, Development, and Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Fernando Fonseca & Escolástica Fernandes & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Walkable Cities: Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimarães, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Pengyang Zhang & Lewen Zhang & Dandan Han & Tingting Wang & He Zhu & Yongtao Chen, 2023. "Coupled and Coordinated Development of the Tourism Industry and Urbanization in Marginal and Less Developed Regions—Taking the Mountainous Border Areas of Western Yunnan as a Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Kamila Štekerová & Josef Zelenka & Milan Kořínek, 2022. "Agent-Based Modelling in Visitor Management of Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Jingru Chen & Hengyuan Zeng & Qiang Gao, 2023. "Using the Sustainable Development Capacity of Key Counties to Guide Rural Revitalization in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-26, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4615-:d:1087971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.