IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2450-d1051121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Periurban Streetscape—Vernacular Front Gardens and Their Potential to Provide Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Warsaw, Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Beata J. Gawryszewska

    (Department of Landscape Art Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166 Street, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Izabela Myszka

    (Department of Landscape Art Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166 Street, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Michał Banaszek

    (Department of Landscape Art Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166 Street, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Axel Schwerk

    (Department of Landscape Art Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166 Street, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

At the time of reflection on green justice, when the role of public green spaces is increasing, it is worth paying attention to vernacular greenery, especially in single-family residential areas on city outskirts which property owners arrange in front parts of plots. The paper’s aim is to show that vernacular front gardens (VFG) can act as missing public space and at the same time have the attributes of public green space, providing ecosystem services (ES). In order to confirm these assumptions, we carried out a VFG’s attributes inventory and a survey on garden designers. We identified dominating garden features and conducted a cluster analysis of the gardens based on their characteristics. The basis for building periurban streetscape in single-family housing estates is the visual inclusiveness of VFGs. They provide all the ES groups, playing representational, natural and recreational roles as well as serving as locations of edible plants production. Streets in residential sites, thanks to VFG, can be treated as real green public spaces creating a type of green area accessible not only to owners but also to pedestrian eyes. We conclude that our results can be valuable for city planning but also for the professional garden designers.

Suggested Citation

  • Beata J. Gawryszewska & Izabela Myszka & Michał Banaszek & Axel Schwerk, 2023. "Periurban Streetscape—Vernacular Front Gardens and Their Potential to Provide Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Warsaw, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2450-:d:1051121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2450/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2450/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Outi Tahvonen, 2018. "Scalable Green Infrastructure—The Case of Domestic Private Gardens in Vuores, Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Zoltán Cs�falvay & Chris Webster, 2012. "Gates or No Gates? A Cross-European Enquiry into the Driving Forces behind Gated Communities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 293-308, June.
    3. Sikorski, Piotr & Gawryszewska, Beata & Sikorska, Daria & Chormański, Jarosław & Schwerk, Axel & Jojczyk, Agata & Ciężkowski, Wojciech & Archiciński, Piotr & Šepkowski, Maciej & Dymitryszyn, Iza, 2021. "The value of doing nothing – How informal green spaces can provide comparable ecosystem services to cultivated urban parks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    4. David Kleijn & Frank Berendse & Ruben Smit & Niels Gilissen, 2001. "Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes," Nature, Nature, vol. 413(6857), pages 723-725, October.
    5. Mohri, Hideyuki & Lahoti, Shruti & Saito, Osamu & Mahalingam, Anparasan & Gunatilleke, Nimal & Irham, & Hoang, Van Thang & Hitinayake, Gamini & Takeuchi, Kazuhiko & Herath, Srikantha, 2013. "Assessment of ecosystem services in homegarden systems in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Vietnam," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 124-136.
    6. Mark Bhatti & Andrew Church & Amanda Claremont, 2014. "Peaceful, Pleasant and Private: The British Domestic Garden as an Ordinary Landscape," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 40-52, February.
    7. Ayse Ozbil & Tugce Gurleyen & Demet Yesiltepe & Ezgi Zunbuloglu, 2019. "Comparative Associations of Street Network Design, Streetscape Attributes and Land-Use Characteristics on Pedestrian Flows in Peripheral Neighbourhoods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barraquand, F. & Martinet, V., 2011. "Biological conservation in dynamic agricultural landscapes: Effectiveness of public policies and trade-offs with agricultural production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 910-920, March.
    2. Anja Schmitz & Johannes Isselstein, 2020. "Effect of Grazing System on Grassland Plant Species Richness and Vegetation Characteristics: Comparing Horse and Cattle Grazing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Meijerink, Gerdien W., 2007. "If services aren't delivered, people won't pay: the role of measurement problems and monitoring in Payments for Environmental Services," 106th Seminar, October 25-27, 2007, Montpellier, France 7948, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Jie Ding & Zhengdong Gao & Shanshan Ma, 2022. "Understanding Social Spaces in Tourist Villages through Space Syntax Analysis: Cases of Villages in Huizhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Heitor Mancini Teixeira & Leonardo Van den Berg & Irene Maria Cardoso & Ardjan J. Vermue & Felix J. J. A. Bianchi & Marielos Peña-Claros & Pablo Tittonell, 2018. "Understanding Farm Diversity to Promote Agroecological Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Martinet, Vincent, 2014. "The economics of the Food versus Biodiversity debate," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182800, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Clements, Jen & Lobley, Matt & Osborne, Juliet & Wills, Jane, 2021. "How can academic research on UK agri-environment schemes pivot to meet the addition of climate mitigation aims?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    8. Yibang Zhang & Yukun Zou & Zhenjun Zhu & Xiucheng Guo & Xin Feng, 2022. "Evaluating Pedestrian Environment Using DeepLab Models Based on Street Walkability in Small and Medium-Sized Cities: Case Study in Gaoping, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    9. Giada Casarin & Julie MacLeavy & David Manley, 2023. "Rethinking urban utopianism: The fallacy of social mix in the 15-minute city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3167-3186, December.
    10. Setiani Setiani & Eko Setiawan & Wen-Chi Huang, 2022. "Taneyan Lanjang Shared Home Gardens and Sustainable Rural Livelihoods of Ethnic Madurese in Madura Island, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    11. Ingunn M Tombre & Einar Eythórsson & Jesper Madsen, 2013. "Towards a Solution to the Goose-Agriculture Conflict in North Norway, 1988–2012: The Interplay between Policy, Stakeholder Influence and Goose Population Dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-8, August.
    12. Ohl, C. & Drechsler, M. & Johst, K. & Wätzold, F., 2008. "Compensation payments for habitat heterogeneity: Existence, efficiency, and fairness considerations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 162-174, September.
    13. Groot, Jeroen C.J. & Rossing, Walter a.H. & Tichit, Muriel & Turpin, Nadine & Jellema, André & Baudry, Jacques & Verburg, Peter & Doyen, Luc & van de Ven, Gerrie, 2009. "On the contribution of modelling to multifunctional agriculture: learning from comparisons," MPRA Paper 65467, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. McInnes, R.J. & Everard, M., 2017. "Rapid Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Services (RAWES): An example from Colombo, Sri Lanka," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 89-105.
    15. Stępniewska, Małgorzata & Grunewald, Karsten & Villoslada, Miguel & Mizgajski, Andrzej, 2022. "The various faces of transdisciplinarity in research on ecosystem services: Editorial to Special Issue," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    16. Lee, Cha-Hee, 2020. "Understanding rural landscape for better resident-led management: Residents’ perceptions on rural landscape as everyday landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Natalia Estrada-Carmona & Jessica E. Raneri & Stephanie Alvarez & Carl Timler & Shantonu Abe Chatterjee & Lenora Ditzler & Gina Kennedy & Roseline Remans & Inge Brouwer & Karin Borgonjen-van Berg & El, 2020. "A model-based exploration of farm-household livelihood and nutrition indicators to guide nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(1), pages 59-81, February.
    18. Suchocka, Marzena & Heciak, Jakub & Błaszczyk, Magdalena & Adamczyk, Joanna & Gaworski, Marek & Gawłowska, Agnieszka & Mojski, Jacek & Kalaji, Hazem M. & Kais, Karolina & Kosno-Jończy, Joanna & Hec, 2023. "Comparison of Ecosystem Services and Replacement Value calculations performed for urban trees," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    19. Yang, Wei & Hu, Jie & Liu, Yong & Guo, Wenbo, 2023. "Examining the influence of neighborhood and street-level built environment on fitness jogging in Chengdu, China: A massive GPS trajectory data analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Fanya Qin & Katsue Fukamachi & Shozo Shibata, 2022. "Land-Use/Landscape Pattern Changes and Related Environmental Driving Forces in a Dong Ethnic Minority Village in Southwestern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2450-:d:1051121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.