IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15908-d1279561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Online Assessment Tools of the MenPas 1.0 Platform, a Reliable and Sustainable Alternative for Psychosocial Research: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Nuria Pérez-Romero

    (Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Postgraduate, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago de Chile 7591538, Chile)

  • Verónica Morales-Sánchez

    (Department of Social Psychology, Social Anthropology, Social Work and Social Services, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • José L. Pastrana-Brincones

    (Computer and Information Sciences, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN 55105, USA
    Departamento Lenguajes y Ciencias de la Computación, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • Carolina Sánchez-García

    (Department of Social Psychology, Social Anthropology, Social Work and Social Services, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • Antonio Hernández-Mendo

    (Department of Social Psychology, Social Anthropology, Social Work and Social Services, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • Coral Falcó

    (Department Western Norway, University of Applied Sciences, 5063 Bergen, Norway)

  • Rafael Enrique Reigal

    (Department of Social Psychology, Social Anthropology, Social Work and Social Services, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

Abstract

New technologies have improved the efficiency and sustainability of psychosocial research. However, online assessment tools may differ from traditional paper-based ones in different domains. This study aims to provide an updated perspective of the online assessment advantages of a psychosocial platform called MenPas 1.0. A literature review was conducted, choosing validated questionnaire studies located in the MenPas 1.0 platform, specifically, motivation and hypnosis questionnaires. A total of five studies showing the psychometric properties of psychosocial evaluation tools were analysed and compared with their previous paper-based studies. In addition, internet impact over the last 20 years was analysed according to gender, age, nationality, and employment status. Finally, a conclusion was drawn on the impact of these tools on sustainability. The results showed that online studies have a higher number of participants (5866 users in 5 studies versus 5623 participants in 11 studies) and higher reliability rates than those of previous paper-based ones. A decrease in the social gap over the years was also found and the contribution of online tools to sustainability was discussed. This study could show the importance of the analysis of psychometric properties in online tools, the need for further research, and encourage their use in psychosocial assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuria Pérez-Romero & Verónica Morales-Sánchez & José L. Pastrana-Brincones & Carolina Sánchez-García & Antonio Hernández-Mendo & Coral Falcó & Rafael Enrique Reigal, 2023. "The Online Assessment Tools of the MenPas 1.0 Platform, a Reliable and Sustainable Alternative for Psychosocial Research: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15908-:d:1279561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15908/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15908/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chan, Chien Aun & Gygax, André F. & Leckie, Christopher & Wong, Elaine & Nirmalathas, Ampalavanapillai & Hinton, Kerry, 2016. "Telecommunications energy and greenhouse gas emissions management for future network growth," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 174-185.
    2. M. Auxiliadora Franquelo & Inés Tomás & Antonio Capafons & Antonio Hernández-Mendo, 2021. "Psychometric properties of the Valencia Scale of Attitudes and Beliefs Towards Hypnosis (therapist version) (VSABTH-T) online version," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 203-219, February.
    3. Verónica Morales-Sánchez & Nuria Pérez-Romero & María Auxiliadora Franquelo & Isabel Balaguer & Antonio Hernández-Mendo & Rafael E. Reigal, 2022. "Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ): Psychometric Properties in Its Digital Version," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-9, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bertha Margarita Viñas-Velázquez & Manuel Alejandro Mejía-Ramírez & M. Elena Mendoza & Julieta Yadira Islas-Limón & Antonio Capafons, 2022. "Psychometric properties of the Valencia Scale of Attitudes and Beliefs toward Hypnosis Client version (VSABH-C) in a mexican sample," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3685-3697, October.
    2. Bára Elísabet Dagsdóttir & Hafrún Kristjánsdóttir & Vaka Vésteinsdóttir & Fanney Thorsdottir, 2023. "Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire: A Mokken Scale Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    3. Radonjič, Gregor & Tompa, Saša, 2018. "Carbon footprint calculation in telecommunications companies – The importance and relevance of scope 3 greenhouse gases emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 361-375.
    4. Williams, Laurence & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Foxon, Timothy J., 2022. "The energy use implications of 5G: Reviewing whole network operational energy, embodied energy, and indirect effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15908-:d:1279561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.