IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15734-d1276204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extension Cloud Model and Grey Clustering Evaluation of Enterprise Safety Management System: Based on COWA-CRITIC Combination Weighting

Author

Listed:
  • Shanda Duan

    (School of Resources, Environment and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Xuefeng Li

    (School of Resources, Environment and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Xiashi Jiang

    (School of Resources, Environment and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Xuxing Huang

    (School of Resources, Environment and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Yihao Yang

    (School of Resources, Environment and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Han Du

    (School of Resources, Environment and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Wuning Xiao

    (School of Resources, Environment and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

Abstract

In order to address the issues of unclear risk grading control, lack of safety management, and hidden danger investigation and management processes, this paper used a mining enterprise as the backdrop for an engineering example. The “evaluation model of the overall construction level of the enterprise safety management system” is constructed from four aspects: “preliminary infrastructure”, “risk grading and control”, “hidden danger investigation and management processes”, and “Post-support work”. The safety evaluation level is divided into five levels, and the evaluation model is combined weighted by using the combined ordered weighted averaging (COWA) algorithm and the criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) method. In addition, the cloud model, the extension cloud model, and the grey clustering evaluation method are used for a thorough evaluation. Finally, the enterprise safety management system’s overall construction level is determined to be good. In order to effectively strengthen the enterprise safety management capability and prevent the occurrence of production safety accidents, this study provides a practical and thorough evaluation method for the evaluation of the enterprise safety management system. This method makes it easier to identify system weaknesses and provides a safety guarantee for the sustainable development of enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Shanda Duan & Xuefeng Li & Xiashi Jiang & Xuxing Huang & Yihao Yang & Han Du & Wuning Xiao, 2023. "Extension Cloud Model and Grey Clustering Evaluation of Enterprise Safety Management System: Based on COWA-CRITIC Combination Weighting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15734-:d:1276204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15734/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15734/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khargotra, Rohit & Kumar, Raj & András, Kovács & Fekete, Gusztáv & Singh, Tej, 2022. "Thermo-hydraulic characterization and design optimization of delta-shaped obstacles in solar water heating system using CRITIC-COPRAS approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    2. Zhao, Bin & Ren, Yi & Gao, Diankui & Xu, Lizhi, 2019. "Performance ratio prediction of photovoltaic pumping system based on grey clustering and second curvelet neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 360-371.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Liu & Zhongyi Feng & Xiao Luo, 2024. "Measurement of Synergy Management Performance in Prefabricated Building Project Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luo, Zhenmin & Kang, Xiaofeng & Wang, Tao & Su, Bin & Cheng, Fangming & Deng, Jun, 2021. "Effects of an obstacle on the deflagration behavior of premixed liquefied petroleum gas-air mixtures in a closed duct," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Masmoudi, Abdelkarim & Abdelkafi, Achraf & Krichen, Lotfi & Saidi, Abdelaziz Salah, 2022. "An experimental approach for improving stability in DC bus voltage of a stand-alone photovoltaic generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    3. Adar, Mustapha & Najih, Youssef & Gouskir, Mohamed & Chebak, Ahmed & Mabrouki, Mustapha & Bennouna, Amin, 2020. "Three PV plants performance analysis using the principal component analysis method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    4. Elnozahy, Ahmed & Abdel-Salam, Mazen & Abo-Elyousr, Farag K., 2024. "Optimal techno-economic energy coordination of solar PV water pumping irrigation systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    5. Danyang Di & Qi Shi & Zening Wu & Huiliang Wang, 2023. "Sustainable Management and Environmental Protection for Basin Water Allocation: Differential Game-based Multiobjective Programming," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Juan Ignacio Herraiz & Rita Hogan Almeida & Manuel Castillo-Cagigal & Luis Narvarte, 2023. "Experimental Performance Evaluation of a PV-Powered Center-Pivot Irrigation System for a Three-Year Operation Period," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Xiaofei Li & Zhao Wang & Yinnan Liu & Haifeng Wang & Liusheng Pei & An Wu & Shuang Sun & Yongjun Lian & Honglu Zhu, 2023. "A Novel Operating State Evaluation Method for Photovoltaic Strings Based on TOPSIS and Its Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15734-:d:1276204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.