IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14203-d1247775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Citizens’ Adoption of Sustainable Innovations Implemented by Cities and Municipalities in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Cindy Schaefer

    (Chair for Information Systems, Faculty III, University of Siegen, 57072 Siegen, Germany)

  • Aida Stelter

    (Chair for Information Systems, Faculty III, University of Siegen, 57072 Siegen, Germany)

  • Marie Godefroid

    (Chair for Information Systems, Faculty III, University of Siegen, 57072 Siegen, Germany)

  • Björn Niehaves

    (Digital Public, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany)

Abstract

Sustainable innovations, such as sustainable products or services, are becoming increasingly relevant for society and thrive on societies’ knowledge and usage. But this is where many cities/municipalities are experiencing disharmony: citizens often do not know that these sustainable innovations exist and, therefore, do not use them. Our study starts at this point: To address this disharmony in Germany, the government has established the German Sustainability Award, which honors cities/municipalities with outstanding sustainable innovations. We qualitatively surveyed the citizens and administrations of these cities about their knowledge and use in their city/municipality (using eight categories) under the theoretical lens of Rogers’ (1960/2003) Diffusion of Innovation Theory (DOI). In 29 interviews in six cities/municipalities, we were able to match sustainable innovations based on DOI. In particular, we determined that few sustainable innovations were only found in specific categories (such as economy (EC)), while others existed in all (such as climate and environment (CE) or education (ED)), and, e.g., city/municipality’s size did not matter at all.

Suggested Citation

  • Cindy Schaefer & Aida Stelter & Marie Godefroid & Björn Niehaves, 2023. "Exploring Citizens’ Adoption of Sustainable Innovations Implemented by Cities and Municipalities in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14203-:d:1247775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14203/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14203/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cees J. Gelderman & Janjaap Semeijn & Rob Vluggen, 2017. "Development of sustainability in public sector procurement," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 435-442, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jozef R. Pattiruhu, 2020. "The Impact of Budget, Accountability Mechanisms and Renewable Energy Consumption on Environmentally Sustainable Development: Evidence from Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 697-703.
    2. Friederike Behr & Gero Oertzen & Manuel Dienst, 2021. "Managing Sustainability and Carbon-Neutrality in the Public Administration—Case Report of a German State Institution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Vera Gelashvili & Juan Gabriel Martínez-Navalón & Miguel Ángel Gómez-Borja, 2024. "Does the intensity of use of social media influence the economic sustainability of the university?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 19-43, February.
    4. Donghun Yoon, 2023. "The Improvement Policy Design of Public Procurement Process for the Public Management Innovation in South Korea," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    5. Adriano Alves Teixeira & Tiago E. C. Moraes & Talita Borges Teixeira & Rosane A. G. Battistelle & Elton Gean Araújo & Quintino Augusto Có de Seabra, 2023. "The Role of Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental Performance of Firms: An Exploratory Survey in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Natacha Klein & Tomás B. Ramos & Pauline Deutz, 2022. "Advancing the Circular Economy in Public Sector Organisations: Employees’ Perspectives on Practices," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 759-781, June.
    7. Tarisai Nduna & Dumisani Mawonde & Josphat Nyoni, 2021. "The Effect of Sustainable Procurement Practices On Procurement Efficiency in Mining Companies in Mashonaland Central Province in Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(11), pages 716-719, November.
    8. Igor Trišić & Snežana Štetić & Donatella Privitera & Marko D. Petrović & Marija Maksin & Slavoljub Vujović & Zoran Jovanović & Marija Kalinić, 2021. "Perspectives on Sustainable Tourism Development in the Hotel Industry—A Case Study from Southern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Monica Da Ponte & Megan Foley & Charles H. Cho, 2020. "Assessing the Degree of Sustainability Integration in Canadian Public Sector Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Dumisani Mawonde & Josphat Nyoni, 2021. "The Effect of Sustainable Procurement Practices On Corporate Image in Mining Companies in Mashonaland Central Province in Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(12), pages 255-258, December.
    11. Rob Vluggen & Cees J. Gelderman & Janjaap Semeijn & Marc van Pelt, 2019. "Sustainable Public Procurement—External Forces and Accountability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Lance W. Saunders & J. Paul Brooks & Jason R. W. Merrick & Chad W. Autry, 2020. "Addressing Economic/Environmental Sustainability Trade‐offs in Procurement Episodes with Industrial Suppliers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(5), pages 1256-1269, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14203-:d:1247775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.