IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p12984-d1227563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizen Science Apps in a Higher Education Botany Course: Data Quality and Learning Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Nadja Pernat

    (Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
    Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research and Applied Ecology (CIBRA), University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany)

  • Anika Kristin Gathof

    (Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany)

  • Johann Herrmann

    (Institute for Bee Protection, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Birgit Seitz

    (Department of Ecology, Technische Universität Berlin, 12165 Berlin, Germany)

  • Sascha Buchholz

    (Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
    Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research and Applied Ecology (CIBRA), University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany)

Abstract

Although species identification apps are becoming increasingly popular in citizen science, they are hardly used in university courses on biodiversity literacy. In this study, we investigated whether the use of a plant identification app by students provides similar data quality to the use of scientific keys and whether it improves the process of knowledge acquisition. To this end, dry grassland plots were monitored in Berlin to record plant species diversity by two groups, Bachelor’s and Master’s students, with different experience in plant identification. Both groups were asked to survey the plots once in April and once in June, the first time with the app Pl@ntNet, and the second time with scientific keys commonly used in teaching. To evaluate their performance and the respective tools, the results were compared with those of experts from the same plots. The students identified, on average, only half of the plants per plot and misidentified or failed to identify a high proportion of species compared with the experts, regardless of the identification tool. In addition, the number of plants identified that did not occur at all in the region or in the considered habitat was alarmingly high. In view of the worldwide loss of species knowledge, it is becoming clear that apps can trigger the study of a species group, but do not solve the fundamental problem of neglecting biodiversity courses at universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadja Pernat & Anika Kristin Gathof & Johann Herrmann & Birgit Seitz & Sascha Buchholz, 2023. "Citizen Science Apps in a Higher Education Botany Course: Data Quality and Learning Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12984-:d:1227563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12984/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12984/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Peter & Tim Diekötter & Kerstin Kremer, 2019. "Participant Outcomes of Biodiversity Citizen Science Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Moritz von der Lippe & Sascha Buchholz & Anne Hiller & Birgit Seitz & Ingo Kowarik, 2020. "CityScapeLab Berlin: A Research Platform for Untangling Urbanization Effects on Biodiversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-30, March.
    3. Corey T Callaghan & Jodi J L Rowley & William K Cornwell & Alistair G B Poore & Richard E Major, 2019. "Improving big citizen science data: Moving beyond haphazard sampling," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-11, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wessel Ganzevoort & Riyan J. G. van den Born, 2021. "Counting Bees: Learning Outcomes from Participation in the Dutch National Bee Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Adrien Guetté & Sébastien Caillault & Joséphine Pithon & Guillaume Pain & Hervé Daniel & Benoit Marchadour & Véronique Beaujouan, 2022. "Who and Where Are the Observers behind Biodiversity Citizen Science Data? Effect of Landscape Naturalness on the Spatial Distribution of French Birdwatching Records," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Beniamino Caputo & Mattia Manica & Federico Filipponi & Marta Blangiardo & Pietro Cobre & Luca Delucchi & Carlo Maria De Marco & Luca Iesu & Paola Morano & Valeria Petrella & Marco Salvemini & Cesare , 2020. "ZanzaMapp: A Scalable Citizen Science Tool to Monitor Perception of Mosquito Abundance and Nuisance in Italy and Beyond," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Bing Mei & Shuxia Yang, 2019. "Nurturing Environmental Education at the Tertiary Education Level in China: Can Mobile Augmented Reality and Gamification Help?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-12, August.
    5. Ingo Kowarik & Leonie K. Fischer & Dave Kendal, 2020. "Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-8, June.
    6. Laura Christ & Marie Hahn & Anne-Kathrin Sieg & Daniel C. Dreesmann, 2022. "Be(e) Engaged! How Students Benefit from an Educational Citizen Science Project on Biodiversity in Their Biology Classes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Andrea Spasiano & Salvatore Grimaldi & Alessio Maria Braccini & Fernando Nardi, 2021. "Towards a Transdisciplinary Theoretical Framework of Citizen Science: Results from a Meta-Review Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    8. M. Enenkel & M. E. Brown & J. V. Vogt & J. L. McCarty & A. Reid Bell & D. Guha-Sapir & W. Dorigo & K. Vasilaky & M. Svoboda & R. Bonifacio & M. Anderson & C. Funk & D. Osgood & C. Hain & P. Vinck, 2020. "Why predict climate hazards if we need to understand impacts? Putting humans back into the drought equation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1161-1176, October.
    9. Baptiste Bedessem & Lucie Morère & Louise Roblin & Anne Dozières & Anne-Caroline Prévot, 2022. "Participatory Biodiversity Governance: A Comparison of Two French Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Ward-Paige, CA & White, Easton R & Madin, EMP & Bailes, LK & Bateman, RL & Belonje, E & Burns, KV & Cullain, N & de Waegh, R S & Eger, Aaron Matthius, 2020. "A framework for mapping and monitoring human-ocean interactions in near real-time during COVID-19 and beyond," OSF Preprints sxnu5, Center for Open Science.
    11. Daniela De Filippo & María Luisa Lascurain & Andres Pandiella-Dominique & Elias Sanz-Casado, 2020. "Scientometric Analysis of Research in Energy Efficiency and Citizen Science through Projects and Publications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    12. Anastasia Adamou & Yiannis Georgiou & Demetra Paraskeva-Hadjichambi & Andreas Ch. Hadjichambis, 2021. "Environmental Citizen Science Initiatives as a Springboard towards the Education for Environmental Citizenship: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-29, December.
    13. Brack W. Hale, 2021. "Educating for the Environment: The Role of the Host Destination in Education Travel Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Federica Compagnone & Marco Varricchione & Michele Innangi & Mirko Di Febbraro & Anna Loy & Angela Stanisci & Maria Carla de Francesco & Giorgio Matteucci & Maria Laura Carranza, 2023. "Coastal Biodiversity Assessment Aided by Citizen Science Volunteers: A Look at the Italian Central Adriatic," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, November.
    15. María Consuelo Sáiz-Manzanares & Sara Gutiérrez-González & Ángel Rodríguez & Lourdes Alameda Cuenca-Romero & Verónica Calderón & Miguel Ángel Queiruga-Dios, 2020. "Systematic Review on Inclusive Education, Sustainability in Engineering: An Analysis with Mixed Methods and Data Mining Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Jennifer Schneiderhan-Opel & Franz X. Bogner, 2020. "The Relation between Knowledge Acquisition and Environmental Values within the Scope of a Biodiversity Learning Module," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Zaenal Akbar & Hani Febri Mustika & Dwi Setyo Rini & Lindung Parningotan Manik & Ariani Indrawati & Agusdin Dharma Fefirenta & Tutie Djarwaningsih, 2021. "An Ontology-Driven Personalized Faceted Search for Exploring Knowledge Bases of Capsicum," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12984-:d:1227563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.