IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11767-d1207026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Priorities in Croatian School Building Maintenance: A Comparison of the Main Stakeholders’ Views

Author

Listed:
  • Ksenija Tijanić Štrok

    (Department of Construction Management and Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Rijeka, Radmile Matejčić 3, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Diana Car-Pušić

    (Department of Construction Management and Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Rijeka, Radmile Matejčić 3, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Saša Marenjak

    (PPP Centar d.o.o., Mlinarska Cesta 61a, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the opinions of the main recognized stakeholders in the maintenance of school buildings (i.e., the construction experts within the founders’ organization, the school staff, and the students), compare their views on the maintenance priorities, and identify certain differences. These data provide information about user needs, can help school founders make maintenance decisions, and are the basis for developing a new, balanced system of maintenance priorities. In the research, the survey questionnaire method was used to collect the data, whereby three groups of stakeholders evaluated the priority of eliminating certain defects in school buildings on a 5-point scale. For the purposes of the questionnaire, a model of 32 defects of the school buildings was created. In the questionnaire, 76 experts, 338 school staff, and 297 students participated. The research is limited to the Republic of Croatia. By conducting non-parametric statistical tests (Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney), it was shown that there were statistically significant differences in the stakeholders’ attitudes towards most maintenance priorities. There were also defects where statistically significant differences were not recognized, namely, regarding faulty lighting fixtures, faulty toilets, faulty sinks, faulty space cooling systems, faulty space heating systems, and faulty hot water heating systems. According to the experts, it is most urgent to remove faulty electrical installations, while according to the school staff, the highest priority is faulty sewage installations. The students believe that the priority is faulty toilets. The lowest priority is removing damage to the external environment (experts) and the facade (school staff and students).

Suggested Citation

  • Ksenija Tijanić Štrok & Diana Car-Pušić & Saša Marenjak, 2023. "Priorities in Croatian School Building Maintenance: A Comparison of the Main Stakeholders’ Views," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11767-:d:1207026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11767/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11767/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatiana Santos Saraiva & Manuela De Almeida & Luís Bragança & Maria Teresa Barbosa, 2018. "Environmental Comfort Indicators for School Buildings in Sustainability Assessment Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tatiana Santos Saraiva & Edson Martins da Silva & Manuela Almeida & Luís Bragança, 2019. "Comparative Study of Comfort Indicators for School Constructions in Sustainability Methodologies: Schools in the Amazon and the Southeast Region of Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Ana Angelita Costa Neves da Rocha & Juan Lucas Nachez, 2023. "School Space and Sustainability in the Tropics: The Case of Thermal Comfort in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Mekhala Kaluarachchi & Anuradha Waidyasekara & Raufdeen Rameezdeen & Nicholas Chileshe, 2021. "Mitigating Dust Pollution from Construction Activities: A Behavioural Control Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Carla Balocco & Alessandro Colaianni, 2018. "Modelling of Reversible Plant System Operations in a Cultural Heritage School Building for Indoor Thermal Comfort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Vicente López-Chao & Antonio Amado Lorenzo & Jorge Martin-Gutiérrez, 2019. "Architectural Indoor Analysis: A Holistic Approach to Understand the Relation of Higher Education Classrooms and Academic Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Tatiana Santos Saraiva & Manuela Almeida & Luís Bragança & Maria Teresa Barbosa, 2019. "The Inclusion of a Sustainability Awareness Indicator in Assessment Tools for High School Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11767-:d:1207026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.