IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10446-d1185528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing Innovation Performance in Portugal: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Based on the Global Innovation Index and on the European Innovation Scoreboard

Author

Listed:
  • Evelina Maria Oliveira Coutinho

    (Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira

    (Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    INESC TEC—Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Innovation plays a key role in meeting the challenges of the future, but despite the unprecedented investment in innovation, Portugal has seen a decline in the various indicators that assess the country’s performance. This study aims to answer questions about the state of innovation in Portugal, based on the relevant global and European innovation indicators, comparing the country’s performance with that of Ireland, Belgium, and the Czech Republic. Using secondary data collected from the reports of the last four years, explanatory research was conducted based on statistical and graphical methods in order to establish causal relationships. The areas where the main changes have taken place are presented, highlighting the aspects in which Portugal stands out for superior or poor performance, providing a benchmark for the definition of policies to foster innovation in Portugal. The results demonstrate that institutions, business sophistication, and knowledge and technology score negatively, while creativity stands out as a strength. Environmental sustainability, firms’ investment in innovation, and the impact of innovation on sales are aspects that Portugal needs to improve; human capital and the attractiveness of the R&D system deserve positive remarks. It is fundamental to understand how Portugal is preparing for the future and what the country can learn from others. This study is limited by the specific period in analysis, which could affect causal relationships, and the historical perspective could provide guidelines to the understanding of the relative position of the country. This study contributes new perspectives and knowledge about the state of innovation in Portugal, providing clues to entrepreneurs, policy makers, and the scientific community.

Suggested Citation

  • Evelina Maria Oliveira Coutinho & Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira, 2023. "Factors Influencing Innovation Performance in Portugal: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Based on the Global Innovation Index and on the European Innovation Scoreboard," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10446-:d:1185528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10446/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10446/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adisu Fanta Bate & Esther Wanjiru Wachira & Sándor Danka, 2023. "The determinants of innovation performance: an income-based cross-country comparative analysis using the Global Innovation Index (GII)," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira, 2022. "Negative Organizations and [Negative] Powerful Relationships and How They Work against Innovation—Perspectives from Millennials, Generation Z and Other Experts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Wilson, Grant Alexander & Case, Tyler & Dobni, C. Brooke, 2023. "A global study of innovation-oriented firms: Dimensions, practices, and performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Edyta Bielińska-Dusza & Monika Hamerska, 2021. "Methodology for Calculating the European Innovation Scoreboard—Proposition for Modification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Ferreira, Jorge & Coelho, Arnaldo & Moutinho, Luiz, 2020. "Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    6. Meda Andrijauskiene & Daiva Dumciuviene & Jovita Vasauskaite, 2021. "Redeveloping the National Innovative Capacity Framework: European Union Perspective," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-30, December.
    7. Octavian Șerban, 2022. "The Multilevel Knowledge Economy Pyramid Model as a Flexible Solution to Address the Impact of Adverse Events in the Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Jian-xun & Zhang, Bo & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush & Budhwar, Pawan & Tan, Hui, 2022. "Demystifying the non-linear effect of high commitment work systems (HCWS) on firms’ strategic intention of exploratory innovation: An extended resource-based view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Hongyi Mao & Zongjun Wang & Lin Yi, 2021. "Does Entrepreneurial Orientation Lead to Successful Sustainable Innovation? The Evidence from Chinese Environmentally Friendly Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Sikandar Ali Qalati & Dragana Ostic & Gu Shuibin & Fan Mingyue, 2022. "A mediated–moderated model for social media adoption and small and medium‐sized enterprise performance in emerging countries," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 846-861, April.
    4. Ge Zhang & Yuxiang Gao & Gaoyong Li, 2023. "Research on Digital Transformation and Green Technology Innovation—Evidence from China’s Listed Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Yi Wang & Xianfang Xue & Han Guo, 2022. "The Sustainability of Market Orientation from a Dynamic Perspective: The Mediation of Dynamic Capability and the Moderation of Error Management Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Xihua Yu & Ning Cao & Hao Ren, 2023. "The Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on the Sustainable Innovation Capabilities of New Ventures: From the Perspective of Ambidextrous Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Qinghua Fu & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Muhammad Zulqarnain Arshad & Ubaldo Comite & Phung Anh Thu & József Popp, 2021. "The Inter-Relationship between Innovation Capability and SME Performance: The Moderating Role of the External Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Mindsponge, AISDL, 2022. "Information chaos and creativity," OSF Preprints vh2pm, Center for Open Science.
    9. Sora Lee & Jaewon Yoo, 2021. "Determinants of a Firm’s Sustainable Competitive Advantages: Focused on Korean Small Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Carmona-Lavado, Antonio & Gimenez-Fernandez, Elena M. & Vlaisavljevic, Vesna & Cabello-Medina, Carmen, 2023. "Cross-industry innovation: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. Tajeddini, Kayhan & Gamage, Thilini Chathurika & Tajdini, Javad & Qalati, Sikandar Ali & Siddiqui, Faiza, 2023. "Achieving sustained competitive advantage in retail and consumer service firms: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial bricolage," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    12. Anca Maria CLIPA & Catalin Ioan CLIPA, 2021. "International Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Case Of Romanian Saas Entrepreneurs," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 43-47, June.
    13. Abeer Al-Khoury & Sahraa Anwer Hussein & Muthana Abdulwhab & Zainab M. Aljuboori & Hossam Haddad & Mostafa A. Ali & Ibtihal A. Abed & Hakeem Hammood Flayyih, 2022. "Intellectual Capital History and Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Chi, Nguyen Thi Khanh, 2021. "Innovation capability: The impact of e-CRM and COVID-19 risk perception," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Muddassar Sarfraz & Larisa Ivascu & Muhammad Ibrahim Abdullah & Ilknur Ozturk & Jasim Tariq, 2022. "Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Firms: The Interplay between Innovation Capabilities, Green Process, Product Innovations and Digital Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Riyan Harbi Valdiansyah & Yvonne Augustine, 2021. "Modelling of beyond budgeting, competitor accounting, transparency, competitive advantage, and organizational performance: The case of Indonesia SMEs," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 22(1), pages 334-349, August.
    17. Nadia Zahoor & Yong Kyu Lew, 2022. "Sustaining superior international performance: Strategic orientations and dynamic capability of environmentally concerned small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1002-1017, March.
    18. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2022. "Information chaos and creativity," OSF Preprints nujm9, Center for Open Science.
    19. Derya Çelik & Ülkü Uzunçarşılı, 2023. "Is the Effect of Organizational Ambidexterity and Technological Innovation Capability on Firm Performance Mediated by Competitive Advantage? An Empirical Research on Turkish Manufacturing and Service ," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    20. Scuotto, Veronica & Garcia-Perez, Alexeis & Nespoli, Chiara & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2020. "A repositioning organizational knowledge dynamics by functional upgrading and downgrading strategy in global value chain," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(4).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10446-:d:1185528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.