IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10056-d1178995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Literacy to Biotechnological Solutions for Environmental Sustainability in Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Margarida Figueiredo

    (Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Rua Romão Ramalho, 59, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal
    Centro de Investigação em Educação e Psicologia, Universidade de Évora, Rua da Barba Rala, 1, Edifício B, 7005-345 Évora, Portugal)

  • Alexandre Dias

    (Itf Healthvita, Rua D. António Ribeiro, 9, 1495-049 Algés, Portugal)

  • José Neves

    (Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário—CESPU, Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde, Rua José António Vidal, 81, 4760-409 Famalicão, Portugal
    Centro Algoritmi/LASI, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Rua da Universidade, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

  • Henrique Vicente

    (Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Rua Romão Ramalho, 59, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal
    Centro Algoritmi/LASI, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Rua da Universidade, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
    Rede de Química e Tecnologia/Laboratório Associado para a Química Verde—REQUIMTE/LAQV, Universidade de Évora, Rua Romão Ramalho, 59, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal)

Abstract

In today’s world, the importance of preserving the environment has become increasingly evident. As a result, more sustainable solutions and techniques are being developed to combat environmental destruction. Higher education institutions are now including environmental themes in their technological courses to promote sustainable behavior and indirectly enhance environmental literacy among the population. This study aims to evaluate the level of literacy to biotechnological solutions for environmental sustainability in four areas, namely Air Pollution, Aquatic Pollution, Global Warming, and Energy Resources. A questionnaire was developed and distributed to a sample consisting of 471 individuals of both genders, age range between 15 and 78 years old, to collect data characterizing the sample and assess their literacy in environmental issues. The questionnaire was distributed in Portugal, and the participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with several statements related to the aforementioned environmental themes. The findings suggest that literacy regarding biotechnological solutions for environmental sustainability is influenced by age group and academic qualifications. The age group above 65 years old is the one with the lowest levels of literacy, exhibiting frequencies of response I don’t know exceeding 50% in 10 out of the 22 issues present in the questionnaire. The findings also suggest that the levels of literacy are higher in the thematic areas of Global Warming and Aquatic Pollution and lower in the thematic areas of Air Pollution and Energy Resources, with lower levels of literacy in the issues that have not been widely disseminated by the media. Additionally, a model based on Artificial Neural Networks was presented to predict literacy to biotechnological solutions for environmental sustainability. The proposed model performs well, achieving accuracy rates of 90.8% for the training set and 86.6% for the test set.

Suggested Citation

  • Margarida Figueiredo & Alexandre Dias & José Neves & Henrique Vicente, 2023. "Assessment of Literacy to Biotechnological Solutions for Environmental Sustainability in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10056-:d:1178995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10056/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10056/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chamara P. Liyanage & Koichi Yamada, 2017. "Impact of Population Growth on the Water Quality of Natural Water Bodies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Annalaura Carducci & Maria Fiore & Antonio Azara & Guglielmo Bonaccorsi & Martina Bortoletto & Giuseppina Caggiano & Andrea Calamusa & Antonella De Donno & Osvalda De Giglio & Marco Dettori & Pamela D, 2021. "Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Determinants and Obstacles among Italian University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zofia Chyleńska & Eliza Rybska & Sylwia Jaskulska & Maciej Błaszak & Barbara Jankowiak, 2022. "How about the Attitudes towards Nature? Analysis of the Nature and Biology Primary School Education Curricula in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Mirzaei, Mohsen & Jafari, Ali & Gholamalifard, Mehdi & Azadi, Hossein & Shooshtari, Sharif Joorabian & Moghaddam, Saghi Movahhed & Gebrehiwot, Kindeya & Witlox, Frank, 2020. "Mitigating environmental risks: Modeling the interaction of water quality parameters and land use cover," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Kushan D. Siriwardhana & Dimantha I. Jayaneththi & Ruchiru D. Herath & Randika K. Makumbura & Hemantha Jayasinghe & Miyuru B. Gunathilake & Hazi Md. Azamathulla & Kiran Tota-Maharaj & Upaka Rathnayake, 2023. "A Simplified Equation for Calculating the Water Quality Index (WQI), Kalu River, Sri Lanka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Elisabeth Pfleger & Hans Drexler & Regina Lutz, 2024. "Health Literacy and Environmental Risks Focusing Air Pollution: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Yi Wu & Rong Dai & Yongfeng Xu & Jiangang Han & Pingping Li, 2018. "Statistical Assessment of Water Quality Issues in Hongze Lake, China, Related to the Operation of a Water Diversion Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    6. Nikša Alfirević & Koraljka Modić Stanke & Fabrizio Santoboni & Giuseppe Curcio, 2023. "The Roles of Professional Socialization and Higher Education Context in Prosocial and Pro-Environmental Attitudes of Social Science and Humanities versus Business Students in Italy and Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Lucie K. Ozanne & Paul W. Ballantine & Aimee McMaster, 2022. "Understanding Food Waste Produced by University Students: A Social Practice Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Gioacchino Fazio & Stefano Fricano & Claudio Pirrone, 2022. "Piattaforme oil and gas e sviluppo turistico: evidenze da una analisi esplorativa sull’accettabilità del decommissioning circolare," Regional Economy, , vol. 6(Q2), pages 15-23.
    9. Syafri Syafri & Batara Surya & Ridwan Ridwan & Syamsul Bahri & Emil Salim Rasyidi & Sudarman Sudarman, 2020. "Water Quality Pollution Control and Watershed Management Based on Community Participation in Maros City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-39, December.
    10. Godfred Owusu-Boateng & Pious Kwame Nkuah, 2022. "The Effect Of Anthropogenic Activities On The Quality Of River Fanoma In Sefwi Akontombra In The Western Region Of Ghana," Journal Clean WAS (JCleanWAS), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 6(2), pages 54-61, September.
    11. Long Zhou & Yao Wu & Tom Woodfin & Rong Zhu & Tian Chen, 2018. "An Approach to Evaluate Comprehensive Plan and Identify Priority Lands for Future Land Use Development to Conserve More Ecological Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Jiansong Wu & Zhuqiang Hu & Jinyue Chen & Zheng Li, 2018. "Risk Assessment of Underground Subway Stations to Fire Disasters Using Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Vasile Gherheș & Mariana Cernicova-Buca & Marcela Alina Fărcașiu & Adina Palea, 2021. "Romanian Students’ Environment-Related Routines during COVID-19 Home Confinement: Water, Plastic, and Paper Consumption," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Yuan Lei & Chen Guoping & Wang Jiasheng & Zhao Junsan & Yang Kun, 2022. "A quantitative analysis method for the degree of coupling coordination between drinking water carrying capacity and population spatial aggregation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 11392-11423, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10056-:d:1178995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.