IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9614-d1171816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical and Economic Assessment of Energy Efficiency of Electrification of Hydrocarbon Production Facilities in Underdeveloped Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Oksana Marinina

    (Department of Economics, Organization and Management, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st Line, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Anna Nechitailo

    (JSC “Flag Alpha”, 7A, 16th Line, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Gennady Stroykov

    (Department of Economics, Organization and Management, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st Line, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Anna Tsvetkova

    (Department of Economics, Organization and Management, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st Line, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Ekaterina Reshneva

    (Department of Economics, Organization and Management, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st Line, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Liudmila Turovskaya

    (Department of Economics, Organization and Management, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st Line, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

The relevance of the technical and economic evaluation of options for the optimization of electrification projects of hydrocarbon production facilities is due to the growing need for the development of new fields in undeveloped and hard-to-reach territories. Development of new fields requires the construction of large amounts of infrastructure energy facilities, new solutions to improve energy efficiency, reducing capital intensity of projects, solutions to improve the efficiency of resource use in the circular economy, and the use of renewable energy sources (RES). Analysis of the technological directions of electrification of hydrocarbon production facilities proves that the low level of application of RES for energy supply purposes is due to the lack of experimental data on the implementation of this kind of project. This study considers features of technological solutions, practical recommendations, and the main limitations of the application of a hybrid automated system based on RES for the electrification of gas production facilities located in poorly-developed territories. A comparative technical and economic analysis of electrification options using autonomous RES and construction of a power transmission line (PTL) to a remote section of an oil and gas condensate field located in the Arctic zone was carried out. In order to justify the implementation of the electrification project with the use of RES sources, the climatic potential of the region was assessed, and the calculation of energy supply needs and a comparison of alternatives on the basis of specific total capital and operating costs were provided. Assessment of the specific indicator of costs for the proposed variant of the autonomous energy complex based on wind generation indicated savings of RUB 2.24 per kilowatt-hour of energy used. The results of the study can be used in project planning and evaluation of proposed technological solutions based on the rational choice of energy sources and optimization of cost indicators for the construction and operation of energy supply systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Oksana Marinina & Anna Nechitailo & Gennady Stroykov & Anna Tsvetkova & Ekaterina Reshneva & Liudmila Turovskaya, 2023. "Technical and Economic Assessment of Energy Efficiency of Electrification of Hydrocarbon Production Facilities in Underdeveloped Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9614-:d:1171816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9614/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9614/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inês Boga Melo & João Paulo N. Torres, 2019. "Economic Sustainability Study of São Miguel Island in the Azores Using Photovoltaic Panels and Wind Turbines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-9, September.
    2. Marcus Sandberg & Jani Mukkavaara & Farshid Shadram & Thomas Olofsson, 2019. "Multidisciplinary Optimization of Life-Cycle Energy and Cost Using a BIM-Based Master Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Rafael Sebastián & Antonio Nevado, 2020. "Study and Simulation of a Wind Hydro Isolated Microgrid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Elena Katysheva, 2023. "Analysis of the Interconnected Development Potential of the Oil, Gas and Transport Industries in the Russian Arctic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Tahseen AL-Saadi & Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Tatyana Semenova, 2022. "Iraq Oil Industry Infrastructure Development in the Conditions of the Global Economy Turbulence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-29, August.
    6. Yurii Vasilev & Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Anna Tsvetkova & Nadejda Komendantova, 2021. "Promoting Public Awareness of Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies in the Russian Federation: A System of Educational Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Gennadiy Stroykov & Alexey Y. Cherepovitsyn & Elizaveta A. Iamshchikova, 2020. "Powering Multiple Gas Condensate Wells in Russia’s Arctic: Power Supply Systems Based on Renewable Energy Sources," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Aleksey M. Fadeev & Sergey S. Vopilovskiy & Sergey V. Fedoseev & Konstantin S. Zaikov & Nikita M. Kuprikov & Mikhail Y. Kuprikov & Natalia S. Avdonina, 2022. "Industrial Support of the Energy Projects as a Part of the Blue Economy Development in the Arctic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Ekaterina Blinova & Tatyana Ponomarenko & Sofiya Tesovskaya, 2023. "Key Corporate Sustainability Assessment Methods for Coal Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenze Li & Rui Liu & Yunwei Li, 2023. "Power Quality Enhancement of Remote Gas Field Generations with Smart Power Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Yury Valeryevich Ilyushin & Ekaterina Ivanovna Kapostey, 2023. "Developing a Comprehensive Mathematical Model for Aluminium Production in a Soderberg Electrolyser," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Minh Phuong Nguyen & Tatiana Ponomarenko & Nga Nguyen, 2024. "Energy Transition in Vietnam: A Strategic Analysis and Forecast," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Alex Borodin & Irina Vygodchikova & Galina Panaedova & Irina Mityushina, 2023. "Rating of Stability of Russian Companies in Oil and Gas and Electric Power Industries Based on Interval Volatility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Marina A. Nevskaya & Semen M. Raikhlin & Victoriya V. Vinogradova & Victor V. Belyaev & Mark M. Khaikin, 2023. "A Study of Factors Affecting National Energy Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Yujiang Zhang & Yining Wang & Bingyuan Cui & Guorui Feng & Shuai Zhang & Chunwang Zhang & Zhengjun Zhang, 2023. "A Disturbed Voussoir Beam Structure Mechanical Model and Its Application in Feasibility Determination of Upward Mining," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Jin Yan & Kejiang Lei & Yuangang Jiang & Minbo Zhang & Weizhong Zhang & Hao Yin, 2023. "Optimization of Accurate Spacing for Gas Extraction from Damaged Coal Seams Based on a Dual-Penetration Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavel Tsiglianu & Natalia Romasheva & Artem Nenko, 2023. "Conceptual Management Framework for Oil and Gas Engineering Project Implementation," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Ekaterina Golovina & Vera Khloponina & Pavel Tsiglianu & Runchu Zhu, 2023. "Organizational, Economic and Regulatory Aspects of Groundwater Resources Extraction by Individuals (Case of the Russian Federation)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Darwin Ortiz & Damián Calderón & Alfredo Viloria & Marvin Ricaurte, 2023. "A Techno-Economic Analysis of Natural Gas Valuation in the Amazon Region to Increase the Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Production in Ecuador," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Zezhou Wu & Changhong Chen & Yuzhu Cai & Chen Lu & Hao Wang & Tao Yu, 2019. "BIM-Based Visualization Research in the Construction Industry: A Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Rafael Sebastián, 2021. "Review on Dynamic Simulation of Wind Diesel Isolated Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Oksana Marinina & Anna Tsvetkova & Yurii Vasilev & Nadejda Komendantova & Anna Parfenova, 2022. "Evaluating the Downstream Development Strategy of Oil Companies: The Case of Rosneft," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Yury Valeryevich Ilyushin & Ekaterina Ivanovna Kapostey, 2023. "Developing a Comprehensive Mathematical Model for Aluminium Production in a Soderberg Electrolyser," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-28, August.
    8. Diana Dmitrieva & Amina Chanysheva & Victoria Solovyova, 2023. "A Conceptual Model for the Sustainable Development of the Arctic’s Mineral Resources Considering Current Global Trends: Future Scenarios, Key Actors, and Recommendations," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, May.
    9. Wenxiao Chu & Maria Vicidomini & Francesco Calise & Neven Duić & Poul Alborg Østergaard & Qiuwang Wang & Maria da Graça Carvalho, 2022. "Recent Advances in Low-Carbon and Sustainable, Efficient Technology: Strategies and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, April.
    10. Rafael Sebastián, 2022. "Improved Operation and Stability of a Wind-Hydro Microgrid by Means of a Li-Ion Battery Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Oksana Marinina & Natalia Kirsanova & Marina Nevskaya, 2022. "Circular Economy Models in Industry: Developing a Conceptual Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Juan Abello-Romero & Claudio Mancilla & Walter Sáez & Francisco Ganga-Contreras & Ivette Durán-Seguel, 2023. "Sustainable Development and Corporate Sustainability of Chilean State Universities: Evidence from Their Strategic Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Marko Jausovec & Metka Sitar, 2019. "Comparative Evaluation Model Framework for Cost-Optimal Evaluation of Prefabricated Lightweight System Envelopes in the Early Design Phase," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-24, September.
    14. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk & Grzegorz Wesołowski, 2021. "The Effect of Using Social Media in the Modern Marketing Communication on the Shaping an External Employer’s Image," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    15. Natalia Kirsanova & Marina Nevskaya & Semyon Raikhlin, 2024. "Sustainable Development of Mining Regions in the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-28, March.
    16. Rafael Sebastián, 2022. "Modeling, Simulation and Control of Wind Diesel Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-2, February.
    17. Oksana Marinina & Marina Nevskaya & Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Radosław Wolniak & Mikhail Marinin, 2021. "Recycling of Coal Fly Ash as an Example of an Efficient Circular Economy: A Stakeholder Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Kyriaki-Argyro Tsioptsia & Eleni Zafeiriou & Dimitrios Niklis & Nikolaos Sariannidis & Constantin Zopounidis, 2022. "The Corporate Economic Performance of Environmentally Eligible Firms Nexus Climate Change: An Empirical Research in a Bayesian VAR Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Carlo Iapige De Gaetani & Andrea Macchi & Pasquale Perri, 2020. "Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Li, Clyde Zhengdao & Lai, Xulu & Xiao, Bing & Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Guo, Shan & Zhao, Yiyu, 2020. "A holistic review on life cycle energy of buildings: An analysis from 2009 to 2019," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9614-:d:1171816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.