IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5611-d809983.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drivers and Barriers to Substituting Firewood with Biomass Briquettes in the Kenyan Tea Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Amalia Suryani

    (Institute for Infrastructure and Resource Management, Universität Leipzig, Grimmaische Str. 12, 04109 Leipzig, Germany
    Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Alberto Bezama

    (Department of Bioenergy, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Claudia Mair-Bauernfeind

    (Institute of System Science, Innovation and Sustainability Research, University of Graz, Merangasse 18/I, 8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Macben Makenzi

    (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Riverside Drive, Nairobi 00100, Kenya)

  • Daniela Thrän

    (Institute for Infrastructure and Resource Management, Universität Leipzig, Grimmaische Str. 12, 04109 Leipzig, Germany
    Department of Bioenergy, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
    Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum Gemeinnützige GmbH, 04347 Leipzig, Germany)

Abstract

The tea industry in Kenya is among the main consumers of firewood for its intensive thermal energy demand. Along with the growing concerns about firewood depletion, tea factories have begun transitioning to alternative fuels to power their boilers. Briquettes made of biomass residues are among the promising solutions; however, they are not yet widely adopted. This study was conducted to identify the factors that motivate the tea factories to use biomass briquettes instead of firewood and the factors hindering such substitution. The substitution potential was assessed, and the drivers and barriers of the substitution were examined using a combination of SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis and a PESTEL (political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal) framework. The findings suggest that even though using biomass briquettes is technically possible, it is not economically favorable for tea factories. The SWOT/PESTEL analysis identified 27 factors influencing the substitution. Among the key drivers are the depleting supply of firewood, the availability of biomass residues, and the external support from development organizations to improve the technical capacity in both tea and briquette industries. The study revealed the barriers to substitution include the cost competitiveness, insufficient supply, and varying quality of briquettes, as well as the lack of awareness and knowledge of briquettes.

Suggested Citation

  • Amalia Suryani & Alberto Bezama & Claudia Mair-Bauernfeind & Macben Makenzi & Daniela Thrän, 2022. "Drivers and Barriers to Substituting Firewood with Biomass Briquettes in the Kenyan Tea Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5611-:d:809983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solomon E. Uhunamure & Karabo Shale, 2021. "A SWOT Analysis Approach for a Sustainable Transition to Renewable Energy in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Cardoen, Dennis & Joshi, Piyush & Diels, Ludo & Sarma, Priyangshu M. & Pant, Deepak, 2015. "Agriculture biomass in India: Part 1. Estimation and characterization," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 39-48.
    3. Asamoah, Bernice & Nikiema, Josiane & Gebrezgabher, Solomie & Odonkor, Elsie & Njenga, M., 2016. "A review on production, marketing and use of fuel briquettes," IWMI Reports 257959, International Water Management Institute.
    4. Bernice Asamoah & Josiane Nikiema & Solomie Gebrezgabher & Elsie Odonkor & Mary Njenga, 2016. "A review on production, marketing and use of fuel briquettes (Resource Recovery and Reuse Series 07)," Resource Recovery and Reuse Series H047991, International Water Management Institute.
    5. Spyridon Achinas & Johan Horjus & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silva, D.A.L. & Filleti, R.A.P. & Musule, R. & Matheus, T.T. & Freire, F., 2022. "A systematic review and life cycle assessment of biomass pellets and briquettes production in Latin America," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Patrick Mukumba & Shylet Y. Chivanga, 2023. "An Overview of Renewable Energy Technologies in the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa and the Rural Households’ Energy Poverty Coping Strategies," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Konrad Siegfried & Susann Günther & Sara Mengato & Fabian Riedel & Daniela Thrän, 2023. "Boosting Biowaste Valorisation—Do We Need an Accelerated Regional Implementation of the European Law for End-of-Waste?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Maurizio Prosperi & Roberta Sisto & Antonio Lopolito & Valentina C. Materia, 2020. "Local Entrepreneurs’ Involvement in Strategy Building to Facilitate Agro-Food Waste Valorisation within an Agro-Food Technological District: A SWOT-SOR Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Maria Meirelles & Fernanda Carvalho & João Porteiro & Diamantino Henriques & Patrícia Navarro & Helena Vasconcelos, 2022. "Climate Change and Impact on Renewable Energies in the Azores Strategic Visions for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Mpho Sam Nkambule & Ali N. Hasan & Thokozani Shongwe, 2023. "Performance and Techno-Economic Analysis of Optimal Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for the Mining Industry in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-40, December.
    7. Maria José Casañ & Marc Alier & Ariadna Llorens, 2021. "A Collaborative Learning Activity to Analyze the Sustainability of an Innovation Using PESTLE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Sahu, Parmanand & Gangil, Sandip & Bhargav, Vinod Kumar, 2023. "Biopolymeric transitions under pyrolytic thermal degradation of Pigeon pea stalk," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 157-167.
    9. Reitumetse Ngcobo & Milan Christian De Wet, 2024. "The Impact of Financial Development and Economic Growth on Renewable Energy Supply in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Marta Wiśniewska & Andrzej Kulig & Krystyna Lelicińska-Serafin, 2021. "Odour Nuisance at Municipal Waste Biogas Plants and the Effect of Feedstock Modification on the Circular Economy—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Magdalena Krysiak & Aldona Kluczek, 2021. "A Multifaceted Challenge to Enhance Multicriteria Decision Support for Energy Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Nunzia Capobianco & Vincenzo Basile & Francesca Loia & Roberto Vona, 2021. "Toward a Sustainable Decommissioning of Offshore Platforms in the Oil and Gas Industry: A PESTLE Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Debnath, Ramit & Bardhan, Ronita & Reiner, David M. & Miller, J.R., 2021. "Political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental dimensions of electric vehicle adoption in the United States: A social-media interaction analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    14. Chofreh, Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh & Goni, Feybi Ariani & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Seyed Moosavi, Seyed Mohsen & Davoudi, Mehdi & Zeinalnezhad, Masoomeh, 2021. "Covid-19 shock: Development of strategic management framework for global energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    15. Agnieszka Piotrowska-Kirschling & Katarzyna Szelągowska-Rudzka & Jakub Karczewski & Joanna Brzeska, 2021. "Application of Shrimp Waste for the Synthesis of Polyurethane–Chitosan Materials with Potential Use in Sorption of Oil Micro-Spills in Water Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Agnė Žičkienė & Mangirdas Morkunas & Artiom Volkov & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene & Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene, 2022. "Sustainable Energy Development and Climate Change Mitigation at the Local Level through the Lens of Renewable Energy: Evidence from Lithuanian Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Andréa Camila dos Santos Martins & Antonio Roberto Balbo & Dylan Jones & Leonardo Nepomuceno & Edilaine Martins Soler & Edméa Cássia Baptista, 2020. "A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Methodology for Solving the Sustainable Dispatch Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Nallagatla Vinod Kumar & Gajanan L. Sawargaonkar & C. Sudha Rani & Ajay Singh & T. Ram Prakash & S. Triveni & Prasad J. Kamdi & Rajesh Pasumarthi & Rayapati Karthik & Bathula Venkatesh, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Pigeonpea Stalk Biochar Characteristics and Energy Use under Different Biochar Production Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Chamizo-Gonzalez, Julián & Cano-Montero, Elisa Isabel & Muñoz-Colomina, Clara Isabel, 2016. "Municipal Solid Waste Management services and its funding in Spain," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 65-72.
    20. Gundupalli, Marttin Paulraj & Bhattacharyya, Debraj, 2021. "Hydrothermal liquefaction of residues of Cocos nucifera (coir and pith) using subcritical water: Process optimization and product characterization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5611-:d:809983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.