IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5094-d800504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interactions among Trialectic Spaces and Their Driving Forces: A Case Study of the Xisi Historical and Cultural Block in Beijing

Author

Listed:
  • Zhifen Cheng

    (Institute of Beijing Studies, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Boning Fan

    (Institute of Beijing Studies, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Shangyi Zhou

    (Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Baoxiu Zhang

    (Institute of Beijing Studies, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

Urban spaces are constantly changing. H. Lefebvre’s trialectic spaces are an analytical tool used to explain changes in urban spaces. However, in trialectic spaces, which space plays a leading role? What is the driving force of interactions in such spaces? At present, there is a lack of research on this issue. This paper, in response to the views of N. J. Babere, takes the Xisi historical and cultural block in Beijing as a case study to answer these questions and uses questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and follow-up surveys to analyze the interaction process of trialectic spaces within green spaces. Then, it analyzes the driving force of this interaction. The purpose of this study is to determine which space plays a leading role in interactions among trialectic spaces and what the driving force behind such interactions is. This paper draws the following conclusions: (1) Representational spaces play a decisive role in interactions among trialectic spaces.. This is consistent with Babere’s findings. (2) In historical and cultural blocks, culture is the driving force promoting the interaction of trialectic spaces. (3) The direction of interaction among trialectic spaces can be either clockwise or counterclockwise.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhifen Cheng & Boning Fan & Shangyi Zhou & Baoxiu Zhang, 2022. "Interactions among Trialectic Spaces and Their Driving Forces: A Case Study of the Xisi Historical and Cultural Block in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5094-:d:800504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5094/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5094/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Garrett Wolf & Nathan Mahaffey, 2016. "Designing Difference: Co-Production of Spaces of Potentiality," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(1), pages 59-67.
    2. Zhifen Cheng & Shangyi Zhou & Baoxiu Zhang, 2018. "The Spatial Factors of Cultural Identity: A Case Study of the Courtyards in a Historical Residential Area in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Farmaki, Anna & Christou, Prokopis & Saveriades, Alexis, 2020. "A Lefebvrian analysis of Airbnb space," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ya-Juan Gao & Chiung-Ling Wang & Min-Ling Huang & Wei Guo, 2022. "A New Perspective of Sustainable Perception: Research on the Smellscape of Urban Block Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaokang Wang & Li Zhu & Jiang Li & Ni Zhang & Yue Tang & Yilin Sun & Honglin Wu & Chuang Cheng, 2023. "Architectural Continuity Assessment of Rural Settlement Houses: A Systematic Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Hadjielias, Elias & Christofi, Michael & Christou, Prokopis & Hadjielia Drotarova, Maria, 2022. "Digitalization, agility, and customer value in tourism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Di Zuo & Changrong Li & Mingliang Lin & Pinyu Chen & Xiang Kong, 2022. "Tourism, Residents Agent Practice and Traditional Residential Landscapes at a Cultural Heritage Site: The Case Study of Hongcun Village, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Zhu, Hongrui, 2021. "Why a non-discrimination policy upset Airbnb hosts?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Lim, Weng Marc & Yap, Sheau-Fen & Makkar, Marian, 2021. "Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 534-566.
    6. Christine Mady, 2022. "The Evolutions, Transformations, and Adaptations in Beirut’s Public Spaces," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 116-128.
    7. Daniel Koch, 2018. "On Architectural Space and Modes of Subjectivity: Producing the Material Conditions for Creative-Productive Activity," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 70-82.
    8. Carlo Fabian & Sandra Janett & Tobias Bischoff & Riccardo Pardini & Johanna Leitner & Carlo Knöpfel, 2019. "The Development of ‘Age Appropriate’ Living Environments: Analysis of Two Case Studies from a Social Work Perspective," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 123-133.
    9. Hamilton, Kathy & Hewer, Paul & Tonner, Andrea, 2022. "Authoritative performances of care in home exchange," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    10. Ernestina S. Nkooe, 2018. "A Lefebvrian Analysis of Public Spaces in Mangaung, South Africa," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 26-39.
    11. David Simon, 2021. "Co-Productive Tools for Transcending the Divide: Building Urban–Rural Partnerships in the Spirit of the New Leipzig Charter," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Christou, Prokopis & Hadjielias, Elias & Simillidou, Aspasia & Kvasova, Olga, 2023. "The use of intelligent automation as a form of digital transformation in tourism: Towards a hybrid experiential offering," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5094-:d:800504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.