IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p3971-d781107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Coastal Access in South Africa: A Historical Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Luyanda Mafumbu

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Science Environmental Science, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, South Africa)

  • Leocadia Zhou

    (Risk and Vulnerability Science Centre, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, South Africa)

  • Ahmed Mukalazi Kalumba

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Science Environmental Science, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, South Africa
    Geospatial Application, Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability Lab–GACCES, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, South Africa)

Abstract

(1) Background: Coastal spaces have been highly contested terrains in South Africa, dating from the colonial period to the present time. Inclusive documentation of the history of coastal access in South Africa is inadequate. The current paper aims to explore the history of coastal access in South Africa, dating back to precolonial times until the present. (2) Methods: this research includes the review of documents in order to understand the phenomenon. Documents ranging from pre-colonial times to the present regarding access to the coast in South Africa were explored. (3) Results: the alienation of the African majority from coastal access in South Africa has been systematically executed through various legislations. Although 1994 (democratic era) ushered in a political change, coastal spaces in South Africa still reflect historical racial divide, with former Caucasian areas well-endowed with facilities whilst others are still underdeveloped. The lack of access to coastal resources remains a challenge to many previously disadvantaged communities, owing to South Africa’s history of Apartheid. Apartheid spatial planning remains a factor that undermines equitable access to the coast. (4) Conclusions: Our conclusions show that, although the Native Land Act of 1913 was abolished, the failure to implement meaningful land redress continues to perpetuate Apartheid spatial order. Furthermore, a drastic shift in spatial planning and socio-economic development must be implemented to address the imbalances of the past. Although the Integrated Coastal Management Act (2008) is a progressive legislation, capacity and boldness is needed to implement the expropriation of coastal land for public interest. South African jurisprudence also needs to deal with the perceived unequal regard for private property rights and public property rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Luyanda Mafumbu & Leocadia Zhou & Ahmed Mukalazi Kalumba, 2022. "Exploring Coastal Access in South Africa: A Historical Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3971-:d:781107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3971/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3971/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hersoug, Bjorn & Holm, Petter, 2000. "Change without redistribution: an institutional perspective on South Africa's new fisheries policy," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 221-231, May.
    2. Arnason, Ragnar, 1991. "Efficient management of ocean fisheries," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2-3), pages 408-417, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costello, Christopher & Molina, Renato, 2021. "Transboundary marine protected areas," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. MacGregor, James & Karousakis, Katia & Groom, Ben, 2004. "Using Economic Incentives to Conserve CITES-listed Species: A Scoping Study on ITQs for Sturgeon in the Caspian Sea," Discussion Papers 24139, International Institute for Environment and Development, Environmental Economics Programme.
    3. Holm, Petter & Raakjær, Jesper & Becker Jacobsen, Rikke & Henriksen, Edgar, 2015. "Contesting the social contracts underpinning fisheries—Lessons from Norway, Iceland and Greenland," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 64-72.
    4. Jose Maria Rocha & Javier García-Cutrín & Maria-Jose Gutiérrez & Raul Prellezo & Eduardo Sanchez, 2021. "Dynamic Integrated Model for Assessing Fisheries: Discard Bans as an Implicit Value-Added Tax," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 80(1), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Kevin St. Martin, 2005. "Mapping Economic Diversity in the First World: The Case of Fisheries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(6), pages 959-979, June.
    6. Lesley Welman & Sanette LA Ferreira, 2017. "Sea Harvest: Back(fish)bone in Saldanha Bay’s local and regional economy?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(6), pages 487-504, September.
    7. Molina, Renato & Costello, Christopher & Kaffine, Daniel, 2024. "Sharing and expanding the co-benefits of conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    coast; access; history; South Africa;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3971-:d:781107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.