IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3407-d770946.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Grazing Indigenous Laying Hens on Soil Properties: Benefits and Challenges to Achieving Soil Fertility

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro R. Soares

    (Polytechnic of Coimbra, Coimbra Agriculture School, Bencanta, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Rosinda L. Pato

    (Polytechnic of Coimbra, Coimbra Agriculture School, Bencanta, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal
    Research Centre for Natural Resources, Environment and Society (CERNAS), Coimbra Agriculture School, Bencanta, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Susana Dias

    (Polytechnic of Coimbra, Coimbra Agriculture School, Bencanta, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal
    Research Centre for Natural Resources, Environment and Society (CERNAS), Coimbra Agriculture School, Bencanta, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Daniela Santos

    (Polytechnic of Coimbra, Coimbra Agriculture School, Bencanta, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal
    Research Centre for Natural Resources, Environment and Society (CERNAS), Coimbra Agriculture School, Bencanta, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal)

Abstract

Crop–livestock integration fosters a holistic view of the agricultural system, which is nowadays particularly relevant due to the rising environmental concerns. Laying hens can contribute to improvement of soil chemical properties, but their effects in soil fertility are not fully known. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of grazing laying hens on soil fertility. To meet this goal, we assessed the effects of indigenous laying hens in 22 soil parameters, including chemical, physical, and microbiological parameters, in two farms from the central region of Portugal: an organic horticultural field (A) and a conventional orchard (B). At farm A, the animals grazed during the dry period for 84 continuous days, at a density of 4 m 2 per hen. At farm B, the animals grazed during the wet period, at a density of 3.50 m 2 per hen, in two periods (34 + 33 days), with a 50 day break period in between grazing. The hens contributed to an increase in the extractable macronutrients phosphorus (P 2 O 5 ) and potassium (K 2 O), mineral nitrogen (NH 4 + -N and NO 3 − -N), and exchangeable bases calcium (Ca 2+ ) and magnesium (Mg 2+ ) in both farms, making these central parameters to consider in their grazing management. At farm A, where soil disturbance is higher, the grazing did not affect soil moisture retention but positively affected soil dry bulk density and contributed to an increase in total aerobic bacteria and nitrogen-fixing bacteria abundances. At farm B, where the hens’ presence led to the understory eradication, soil moisture retention, total aerobic bacteria, nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and fungi abundances were negatively affected, while soil dry bulk density was unaffected. These results show that hens can significantly contribute to improve soil fertility, but more research is needed regarding their grazing management.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro R. Soares & Rosinda L. Pato & Susana Dias & Daniela Santos, 2022. "Effects of Grazing Indigenous Laying Hens on Soil Properties: Benefits and Challenges to Achieving Soil Fertility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3407-:d:770946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3407/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3407/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Högberg & Anders Nordgren & Nina Buchmann & Andrew F. S. Taylor & Alf Ekblad & Mona N. Högberg & Gert Nyberg & Mikaell Ottosson-Löfvenius & David J. Read, 2001. "Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration," Nature, Nature, vol. 411(6839), pages 789-792, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huan Zhao & Hai Liu & Houjun Xiao & Gang Hu & Ming Gao & Zhengyin Wang, 2022. "Optimal K Management Improved Potato Yield and Soil Microbial Community Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Kangwei Jiang & Qingqing Zhang & Yafei Wang & Hong Li & Yongqiang Yang & Tursunnay Reyimu, 2023. "The Combination of Plant Diversity and Soil Microbial Diversity Directly and Actively Drives the Multifunctionality of Grassland Ecosystems in the Middle Part of the Northern Slopes of the Tian Shan u," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Wang & Wenjing Zeng & Weile Chen & Hui Zeng & Jingyun Fang, 2013. "Soil Respiration and Organic Carbon Dynamics with Grassland Conversions to Woodlands in Temperate China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Q. Hao & C. Jiang, 2014. "Contribution of root respiration to soil respiration in a rape (Brassica campestris L.) field in Southwest China," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(1), pages 8-14.
    3. Kaiqiang Bao & Haifeng Tian & Min Su & Liping Qiu & Xiaorong Wei & Yanjiang Zhang & Jian Liu & Hailong Gao & Jimin Cheng, 2019. "Stability of Ecosystem CO 2 Flux in Response to Changes in Precipitation in a Semiarid Grassland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Agnieszka Klimek-Kopyra & Urszula Sadowska & Maciej Kuboń & Maciej Gliniak & Jakub Sikora, 2021. "Sunflower Husk Biochar as a Key Agrotechnical Factor Enhancing Sustainable Soybean Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Huang, Suo & Arain, M. Altaf & Arora, Vivek K. & Yuan, Fengming & Brodeur, Jason & Peichl, Matthias, 2011. "Analysis of nitrogen controls on carbon and water exchanges in a conifer forest using the CLASS-CTEMN+ model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(20), pages 3743-3760.
    6. Ni Huang & Li Wang & Yongsen Hu & Haifeng Tian & Zheng Niu, 2016. "Spatial Variation of Soil Respiration in a Cropland under Winter Wheat and Summer Maize Rotation in the North China Plain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Amy Concilio & Jiquan Chen & Siyan Ma & Malcolm North, 2009. "Precipitation drives interannual variation in summer soil respiration in a Mediterranean-climate, mixed-conifer forest," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 109-122, January.
    8. Xiongwen Chen & Wilfred Post & Richard Norby & Aimée Classen, 2011. "Modeling soil respiration and variations in source components using a multi-factor global climate change experiment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 459-480, August.
    9. François Le Tacon & Bernd Zeller & Caroline Plain & Christian Hossann & Claude Bréchet & Christophe Robin, 2013. "Carbon Transfer from the Host to Tuber melanosporum Mycorrhizas and Ascocarps Followed Using a 13C Pulse-Labeling Technique," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-9, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3407-:d:770946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.